KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

PARANASAL SINUS ANATOMICAL DIFFERENCES IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

Selçuk MÜLAZIMOĞLU
Serkan ÖNER
Nihat YILMAZ
Erkay NACAR
Orhan YILMAZ
Sayfa
129–137
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The prevalence ofKeros Type III olfactory fossa was significantly higher in the Elderly group than in theControl group (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgeries performed on elderlypatients can be challenging due to anatomical variations, and can be studied usingpreoperative computed tomography.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of the present study was to evaluateparanasal sinus anatomical differences in elderly patients compared to a youngercontrol group.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated paranasal computedtomography scans of 47 elderly patients (>65 years old) (Elderly group) and 47younger patients (Control group) for midfacial skeletal size (interzygomatic buttressdistance, nasion-basion distance), anatomical variations, dimensions, and paranasalsinus volumes.Results: The mean age of the Elderly group was 69.89 years (65- 81 years) andthe mean age of the Control group was 33.15 years (20-49 years).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The prevalence ofKeros Type III olfactory fossa was significantly higher in the Elderly group than in theControl group (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgeries performed on elderlypatients can be challenging due to anatomical variations, and can be studied usingpreoperative computed tomography. The aim of the present study was to evaluateparanasal sinus anatomical differences in elderly patients compared to a youngercontrol group.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated paranasal computedtomography scans of 47 elderly patients (>65 years old) (Elderly group) and 47younger patients (Control group) for midfacial skeletal size (interzygomatic buttressdistance, nasion-basion distance), anatomical variations, dimensions, and paranasalsinus volumes.Results: The mean age of the Elderly group was 69.89 years (65- 81 years) andthe mean age of the Control group was 33.15 years (20-49 years). There was nosignificant difference in midfacial size between the two groups. The prevalence ofKeros Type III olfactory fossa was significantly higher in the Elderly group than in theControl group (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MÜLAZIMOĞLU, S., ÖNER, S., YILMAZ, N., NACAR, E., YILMAZ, O. (2022). PARANASAL SINUS ANATOMICAL DIFFERENCES IN ELDERLY PATIENTS. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 129–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/624073

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23(3):163-8. (PMID: 7835518)
  2. Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, Uzun A. Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2007;34(2):191-5. (PMID: 17084569)
  3. Takahashi Y, Watanabe T, Iimura A, Takahashi O. A study of the maxillary sinus volume in elderly persons using Japanese cadavers. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2016;93(1):21-7. (PMID: 27725358)
  4. Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part II. Normal values and growth trends. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29(2):118- 28. (PMID: 1571345)
  5. Yonetsu K, Watanabe M, Nakamura T. Age-related expansion and reduction in aeration of the sphenoid sinus: volume assessment by helical CT scanning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21(1):179-82. (PMID: 10669247)
  6. Fatu C, Puisoru M, Rotaru M, Truta A. Morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus in relation to age. Ann Anat 2006;188(3):275-80. (PMID: 16711167)
  7. Natsis K, Karabatakis V, Tsikaras P, Chatzibalis T, Stangos A, Stangos N. Frontal sinus anatomical variations with potential consequences for the orbit. Study on cadavers. Morphologie. 2004;88(280):35-8. (PMID: 15208811)
  8. Ohnishi T, Yanagisawa E. Lateral lamella of the cribriform plate—an important high-risk area in endoscopic sinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat J 1995;74(10):688-90. (PMID: 8529546)
  9. Keros P. On the practical importance of differences in the level of the cribriform plate of the ethmoid. Rhinol Otol 1965;41:808-13
  10. Ramakrishnan VR, Suh JD, Kennedy DW, editors. Ethmoid skull‐base height: a clinically relevant method of evaluation. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2011:1(5):396-400. (PMID: 22287472
  11. Ramadan HH, Vanmetre R. Endoscopic sinus surgery in geriatric population. Am J Rhinol 2004;18(2):125-7. (PMID: 15152879)
  12. Keast A, Sofie Y, Dawes P, Lyons B. Anatomical variations of the paranasal sinuses in Polynesian and New Zealand European computerized tomography scans. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139(2):216- 21. (PMID: 18656718)
  13. Tonai A, Baba S. Anatomic variations of the bone in sinonasal CT. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1996;525:9-13. (PMID: 8908262)
  14. Bolger WE, Parsons DS, Butzin CA. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abn