Dergiler / Türk Coğrafya Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 68

RASAT verisi kullanarak farklı pan-keskinleş rme yöntemlerinin ista s ksel analizi

Sta s cal analysis of different pan-sharpening methods using RASAT data

Sayfa
57–62
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Uyduya ait teknik bilgiler Tablo 1'de sunulmuştur (Erdoğan vd., 2016)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:RASAT uydusu tasarımı ve üre mi Türkiye de gerçekleş rilmiş olan ilk yerli yer gözlem uydusudur.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Güneş ile eş zamanlı gö- rüngede bulunan RASAT 7.5 m ve 15 m mekansal çözünürlükte pankroma k ve mul spektral görüntü sağlamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Uyduya ait teknik bilgiler Tablo 1'de sunulmuştur (Erdoğan vd., 2016)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

RASAT uydusu tasarımı ve üre mi Türkiye de gerçekleş rilmiş olan ilk yerli yer gözlem uydusudur. Güneş ile eş zamanlı gö- rüngede bulunan RASAT 7.5 m ve 15 m mekansal çözünürlükte pankroma k ve mul spektral görüntü sağlamaktadır. Uyduya ait teknik bilgiler Tablo 1'de sunulmuştur (Erdoğan vd., 2016)

Abstract

The research evaluates the image fusion techniques using RASAT image which is one of the op cal re- mote sensing satellites launched by the Republic of Turkey. The data has 7.5 m ground resolu on panch- roma c and 15 m mul spectral bands (red, green and blue). The aim of the study is to compare the images fusion methods to achieve spa ally improved and spectrally preserved higher resolu on RASAT data. The performance of the data was inves gated by different image fusion methods. For this pur- pose, Ehlers fusion, High Pass Filtering (HPF), Intensity Hue Satura on (IHS) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) data fusion methods were applied and inves gated. The study area is located in Mene- men Izmir province, west of Turkey. The area has different land use classes such as cul vated Şelds, bareland, wetland, water body and pasture. Qualita ve and quan ta ve analyses were applied to as- sess the performance of the fused images. Lower resolu on mul spectral data was compared to fused images visually and color distor ons were inves gated. For the quan ta ve analysis different sta s cal metrics were u lized. In this frame, Correla on Coefficient (CC), Universal Image Quality Index (UIQI), Root Mean Square Devia on (RMSE) and Rela ve Dimensionless Global Error in Synthesis-Erreur Re- la ve Globale Adimensionnelle de Synthese (ERGAS) were performed for quality assessments of spa- ally improved data. Regarding to the results of the pan-sharpening methods it is concluded that Ehlers preserved the best color informa on while the result of HPF provided higher sta s cal results

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

A, S. A. (2022). RASAT verisi kullanarak farklı pan-keskinleş rme yöntemlerinin ista s ksel analizi. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 68, 57–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/621492

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Alparone, L., Aiazzi, B., BaronƟ, S., Garzelli, A., Nencini, F. ve Selva, M. (2008). “MulƟspectral and PanchromaƟc Data Fusion Assessment without Reference”, Photogrammetric Enginnering and Remote Sensing 74:193–200. CeƟn, M. ve Musaoglu, N. (2009). “Merging hyperspectral and panchromaƟc image data: qualitaƟve and quanƟtaƟve analysis”, InternaƟonal Journal of Remote Sensing, 30:1779–1804.
  2. Çağırankaya, S. S. ve Meric¸, B. T. (2013). “Turkey’s important wetlands: RAMSAR Sites”, Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, General Directorate of Nature ConservaƟon and NaƟonal Parks. Erdoğan M., Yılmaz A., Eker O., 2016. “The georeferencing of RASAT satellite imagery and some pracƟcal approaches to increase the georeferencing accuracy”, Geocarto InternaƟonal, 31:6, 647-660.
  3. Ehlers, M. 2004. ‘‘Spectral CharacterisƟcs Preserving Image Fusion Based on Fourier Domain Filtering.’’ In Proceedings of SPIE, Conference on Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS ApplicaƟons, and Geology, IV. Remote Sensing Europe 2004,
  4. Maspalomas, Gran Canaria, Spain, 5574: 1-13. Ghassemian H., 2016. “A review of remote sensing image fusion methods”, InformaƟon Fusion 32 (2016) 75–89.
  5. Hong, G., Zhang, A., Zhou, F. ve Brisco, B. (2014). “IntegraƟon of opƟ- cal and syntheƟc aperture radar (SAR) images to differenƟate grassland and alfalfa in Prairie area”, InternaƟonal Journal of Applied Earth ObservaƟon and GeoinformaƟon 28:12–19.
  6. Jagalingam, P. ve Hegde A.V. (2015). “A Review of Quality Metrics for Fused Image”, AquaƟc Procedia, 4: 133 – 142. Lu, D., Li, G., Moran, E., Dutra, L. ve BaƟstella, M. (2011). “A comparison of mulƟsensor integraƟon methods for land cover classificaƟon in the Brazilian Amazon”, GIScience & Remote Sensing 48: 345–370.
  7. Nikolakopoulos K. ve Oikonomidis D. (2015). “Quality assessment of ten fusion techniques applied on Worldview-2”, European Journal of Remote Sensing, 48: 141-167.
  8. Ozendi, M., Topan, H., Oruc, M. ve Cam, A. (2015). “Pan-sharpening quality invesƟgaƟon of PLÉIADES-1A images”, Geocarto InternaƟonal, DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2015.1094520. Ozendi, M., Topan, H., Cam, A. ve Bayık, Ç. (2016). “Pan Sharpening Quality InvesƟgaƟon Of Turkish In-OperaƟon Remote Sensing Satellites: ApplicaƟons with RASAT And GÖKTÜRK-2 Images”, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. SpaƟal Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W1, 131- 135, Prag. Pohl, C., ve Van Genderen J., (1998). “Review ArƟcle MulƟsensor Image Fusion in Remote Sensing: Concepts, Methods and ApplicaƟons.” InternaƟ