Dergiler / Tüberküloz ve Toraks / 2020 / Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 3

The cost of pulmonary thromboembolism treatment

Sayfa
293–304
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the maintenance period, VKA tends to have a lower cost compared to NOACs

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Primary aim of this study is to determine the financial burden of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA), low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) which are used in the treatment of the pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The patients who are diagnosed with PTE between May 2016 and March 2018 at Faculty of Medicine Karadeniz Technical University Hospital were observed prospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the maintenance period, VKA tends to have a lower cost compared to NOACs
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: Primary aim of this study is to determine the financial burden of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA), low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) which are used in the treatment of the pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Secondary aim is to show long term complications of the treatment options. Materials and Methods: The patients who are diagnosed with PTE between May 2016 and March 2018 at Faculty of Medicine Karadeniz Technical University Hospital were observed prospectively. Hospitalization costs were calculated on patients who were treated only for PTE by hospitalized in the Chest Diseases Service in the acute period. Maintenance costs were calculated over all patients who regulary admitted to our outpatient clinic with the diagnosis of PTE. Data were presented as mean ± SD and median ± interquartilee range. A p-value of < 0.05 was accepted to be significant. Results: Fifty five (37.2%) of the patients were male, 93 (62.8%) were female and the median age was 68 (range 18-95). The median hospitalization time and cost of patients who are discharged with VKA (n: 22) compared with patients discharged with LMWH (n: 22) was found to be increased (1316.82 TL 7,5 days / 803.36 TL, 5 days p< 0.001). Statistical analysis could not be performed with NOAC (n: 2). In the analysis of sixth month costs, LMWH cost was found to be higher than VKA cost (6.927.15 ± 2.687.67 TL/698.29 ± 483.51 TL p< 0.001). However VKA treatment tended to be less expensive than treatment with NOACs (698.29 ± 483.51 TL/1.050.81 ± 300.28 TL p= 0.140). Conclusion: In the acute period of PTE, VKA increases the length of hospitalization and hospital costs in patients treated at the hospital. In the maintenance period, VKA tends to have a lower cost compared to NOACs

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZSU, S., BÜLBÜL, Y., ÖZTUNA, F., COŞKUNER, M. B. (2022). The cost of pulmonary thromboembolism treatment. Tüberküloz ve Toraks, Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 3, 293–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/618355

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ. Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 7S-47S
  2. Konstantinides S, Goldhaber SZ. Pulmonary embolism: Risk assessement and management. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 3014-22
  3. Konstantinides S, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020; 41(4): 543-603
  4. Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, Curto M, Gallus AS, Johnson M, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 799- 808
  5. Buller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW, Decousus H, Jacobson BF, Minar E, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1287-97
  6. Özsu S, Ozlu T, Şentürk A, Uçar EY, Kırkıl G, Ekbiç Kadıoğlu E, et al. Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: Results from Turkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study. Thrombosis Research 2014; 133: 1006-10
  7. Kahler ZP, Beam DM, Kline JA. Cost of treating venous thromboembolism with heparin and warfarin versus home treatment with rivaroxaban. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22: 796-802
  8. Bamber L, Muston D, McLeod E, Guillermin A, Lowin J, Patel R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban compared with combined low molecular weight heparin/ vitamin K antagonist. Thromb J 2015; 13-20
  9. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara, Albaladejo P, Antz M, Desteghe L, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 1330-93
  10. Schulman S. Advantages and limitations of the new anticoagulants. J Intern Med 2014; 275: 1-11
  11. Clay E, Jamotte A, Verhamme P, Cohen AT, Hout BV, Gumbs P. Cost-effectiveness of edoxaban compared to warfarin for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in the UK. J Mark Access Health Policy 2018; 6(1):1495974
  12. Türk M, Aldağ Y, Oğuzülgen İK Ekim N. A cost comparison of warfarin vs enoxaparine or new oral anticoag