Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

Species diversity and community structure of zooplankton in three different types of water body within the Sakarya River Basin, Turkey

Sayfa
848–859
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, the size of the lake area and its electrical conductivitymay affect species diversity and richness depending on the amount and quality of water inflow.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to identify differences between different types of water body within the same river basin bycomparing the composition of the zooplankton community.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 81 species were identified.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, the size of the lake area and its electrical conductivitymay affect species diversity and richness depending on the amount and quality of water inflow.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify differences between different types of water body within the same river basin bycomparing the composition of the zooplankton community. The study was conducted in three types of water body in the Sakarya Basinin northwestern Turkey: an alluvial barrier lake (Lake Poyrazlar), a pond (Sorgun Pond), and a reservoir (Çubuk II Reservoir). Thespatiotemporal changes of these three types of aquatic habitats were investigated in terms of the zooplankton organisms by examiningtheir diversity, evenness, and differences in the abundance of species. A total of 81 species were identified. Thirty-eight species wereobserved in one water body only, while 15 species were observed in all the water bodies. Two of the 15 species belonged to the groupCladocera, while the rest belonged to the phylum Rotifera. The water bodies were different in terms of all the zooplankton species andcladocerans, even though they were located within the same basin. In addition, the size of the lake area and its electrical conductivitymay affect species diversity and richness depending on the amount and quality of water inflow.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜRBÜZER, P., BUYURGAN, Ö., TEKATLI, Ç., ALTINDAĞ, A. (2022). Species diversity and community structure of zooplankton in three different types of water body within the Sakarya River Basin, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 848–859. https://ajindex.com/articles/616195

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. APHA (1975). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 14th edition. Washington, DC: APHA (John D Ducas Co). Adler PB, White EP, Lauenroth WK, Kaufman DM, Rassweiler A, Rusak JA (2005). Evidence for a general species–time–area relationship. Ecology 86: 2032-2039.
  2. Apaydın Yağcı M, Ustaoğlu, MR (2012). Zooplankton fauna of Lake İznik (Bursa, Turkey). Turk J Zool 36: 341-350.
  3. Atay D, Pulatsü S (2000).
  4. Su Kirlenmesi ve Kontrolü. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. 1513-197, 243 (in Turkish). Baas Becking LGM (1934). Geobiologie of inleiding tot de milieukunde. The Hague, the Netherlands: WP Van Stockum & Zoon (in Dutch). Beklioğlu M, Romo S, Kagalou I, Quintana X, Becares E (2007). State of the art in the functioning of shallow Mediterranean lakes: workshop conclusions. Hydrobiologia 584: 317-326.
  5. Beklioğlu M, Meerhoff M, Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E (2011). Eutrophication and restoration of shallow lakes from a cold temperate to a warm Mediterranean and a (sub) tropical climate. In: Ansari AA, Singh Gill S, Lanza GR, Rast W, editors. Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences, and Control. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, pp. 91-108.
  6. Boll T, Levi EE, Bezirci G, Özuluğ M, Tavşanoğlu ÜN, Çakıroğlu Aİ, Özcan S, Brucet S, Jeppesen E, Beklioğlu M (2016). Fish assemblage and diversity in lakes of western and central Turkey: role of geo-climatic and other environmental variables. Hydrobiologia 771: 31-44.
  7. Bonecker CC, Simões NR, Minte-Vera CV, Lansac-Tôha FA, Velho LFM, Agostinho AA (2013). Temporal changes in zooplankton species diversity in response to environmental changes in an alluvial valley. Limnologica 43: 114-121.
  8. Botrell HH, Duncan A, Gliwicz ZM, Grygierek E, Herzig A, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A, Kurasawa H, Larson P, Weglenska T (1976). A review of some problems in plankton production studies. Norw J Zool 24: 419-456.
  9. Bray RJ, Curtis JT (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27: 325-349.
  10. Buyurgan Ö, Altındağ A, Kaya M (2010). Zooplankton community structure of Asartepe Dam Lake (Ankara, Turkey). Turk J Fish Aquat Sc 10: 135-138.
  11. Cakiroglu Aİ, Tavsanoglu ÜN, Levi EE, Davidson TA, Bucak T, Özen A, Akyıldız GK, Jeppesen E, Beklioğlu M (2014). Relatedness between contemporary and subfossil cladoceran assemblages in Turkish lakes. J Paleolimnol 52: 367-383.
  12. Chalkia E, Kehayias G (2013). Zooplankton community dynamics and environmental factors in Lake Ozeros (Greece). M