Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6

Effect of SpermVital® technology on conception rate in repeat breeder multiparous dairy cows: preliminary results

Sayfa
733–736
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This work may also lead to future studies into the use of more animal material.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of SV technology on conception rates in repeat breeder multiparous dairycows.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These animals were cows that hadfailed to conceive from at least 3 regularly spaced services (repeat breeders).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This work may also lead to future studies into the use of more animal material.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of SV technology on conception rates in repeat breeder multiparous dairycows. Seventy-nine multiparous Holstein cows from a private dairy farm were used in the study. These animals were cows that hadfailed to conceive from at least 3 regularly spaced services (repeat breeders). Estrus cycles of the cows were synchronized by 2 injectionsof the PG analogue, administered 11 days apart. GnRH was applied 48 h after the second injection of PG. Twenty-four h after thisadministration, the animals were randomly divided into 2 groups, control and SV. The animals in the control group (n = 28) wereinseminated with standard processed semen, and the cows in the SV group (n = 51) were inseminated with SV® technology processedsemen. A lower pregnancy rate (35.5%) was determined in the control group than in the SV (47.1%) group. The difference betweenpregnancy rates in the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). We are at too early a stage to say that SV® Technology can fullyrespond to the deficiencies in herd management. This work may also lead to future studies into the use of more animal material.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞENDAĞ, S., TREUPEL, E., WEHREND, A., USLU, B. A., KOÇYİĞİT, A. (2022). Effect of SpermVital® technology on conception rate in repeat breeder multiparous dairy cows: preliminary results. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6, 733–736. https://ajindex.com/articles/615206

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Bolwein H, Kawashima C, Shimizu T, Miyamoto A, Kaske M. Impact of metabolism and production diseases on reproductive function in dairy cows. In: Lucy MC, Pate JL, Smith MF, Spencer TE (editors). Reproduction in Domestic Ruminants, 7th ed. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press; 2014. pp. 445-462
  2. Zeron Y, Ocheretny A, Kedar O, Borochov A, Sklan D, Arav A. Seasonal changes in bovine fertility: relation to developmental competence of oocytes, membrane properties and fatty acid composition of follicles. Reproduction 2001; 121: 447-454
  3. Diskin MG, Murphy JJ, Sreenan JM. Embryo survival in dairy cows managed under pastoral conditions. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 96: 297-311
  4. Royal MD, Darwash AO, Flint APF, Webb R, Woolliams JA, Lamming GE. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Anim Sci 2000; 70: 487-501
  5. Cartmill JA, El-Zarkouny SZ, Hensley BA, Lamb GC, Stevenson JS. Stage of cycle, incidence, and timing of ovulation, and pregnancy rates in dairy cattle after three timed breeding protocols. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 1051-1059
  6. Vasconcelos JLM, Silcox RL, Lacerda JA, Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC. Pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss and response to heat stress after AI at 2 different times from ovulation in dairy cows. Biol Reprod 1997; 56: 140
  7. Sreenan JM, Diskin MG. Early embryonic mortality in the cow: its relationship with progesterone concentration. Vet Rec 1983; 112: 517-521
  8. Maurer RR, Chenault JR. Fertilization failure and embryonic mortality in parous and nonparous beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1983; 56: 1186-1189
  9. Senger PL. The estrus detection problem: new conception, technology and possibilities. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77: 2745-2753
  10. Busch W, Löhle K, Peter W. Künstliche Besamung bei Nutztieren. 2st ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer; 1991 (in German)
  11. Busch W, Waberski D. Künstliche Besamung bei Haus- und Nutztieren. 1st ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer; 2007 (in German)
  12. Alm-Kristiansen AH, Dalen G, Klinkenberg G, Bekk L, Thorkildsen LT, Waterhouse KE, Kommisrud E. Reproductive performance of immobilized cryopreserved bovine semen used for timed artificial insemination. Reprod Dom Anim 2017; 52: 1019-1024
  13. Standerholen FB, Waterhouse KE, Larsgard AG, Garmo RT, Myromslien FD, Sunde J, Ropstad E, Klinkenberg G, Kommisrud E. Use of immobilized cryopreserved bovine semen in a blind artificial insemination trial. Theriogenology 2015; 84: 413-420
  14. Wodaje HB, Mekuria TA. Ris