Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Chemical composition and in vitro rumen fermentation of ensiled sugar industry coproducts

Sayfa
30–38
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Using dried SBP and SC sources for the preservation offresh SBL is recommended; however, with higher levels of SC, the silage may be at risk of spoilage, and it must be less exposed to air.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The current study aims to compare sugar beet leaves (SBLs) ensiled with sugar beet pulp (SBP), sugarcane molasses (SM),or rock candy juice (RCJ) using an in vitro gas production technique.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Treatments in the first group included 10% SBP (control 1) andcontrol 1 plus 5% SM or RCJ.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Using dried SBP and SC sources for the preservation offresh SBL is recommended; however, with higher levels of SC, the silage may be at risk of spoilage, and it must be less exposed to air.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The current study aims to compare sugar beet leaves (SBLs) ensiled with sugar beet pulp (SBP), sugarcane molasses (SM),or rock candy juice (RCJ) using an in vitro gas production technique. Treatments in the first group included 10% SBP (control 1) andcontrol 1 plus 5% SM or RCJ. In the second group, there were 3 treatments, including 20% SBP (control 2) and control 2 plus 10% SMor RCJ. The silages with no added soluble carbohydrate (SC) sources had significantly higher (P < 0.001) pH, buffer value index, andammonia nitrogen values than the other treatments. However, there was no significant difference between RCJ and SM in their effecton these variables. Adding both levels of SC sources caused an increase in dry matter digestibility compared to those that only includedSBL and SBP (P < 0.001). Maximal and rate of gas production from slowly fermentable fraction (a2) were significantly greater when thesubstrate contained 85%, 10%, and 5% SBL, SBP, and SC sources, respectively. Using dried SBP and SC sources for the preservation offresh SBL is recommended; however, with higher levels of SC, the silage may be at risk of spoilage, and it must be less exposed to air.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EBRAHIMI, S. H., VALIZADEH, R., ZARNEGAR, Z., NASERIAN, A. A. (2022). Chemical composition and in vitro rumen fermentation of ensiled sugar industry coproducts. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 30–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/615202

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ohuchi Y, Ying C, Lateef SA, Ihara I, Iwasaki M, Inoue R, Umetsu K. Anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet tops silage and dairy cow manure under thermophilic condition. J Mater Cycles Waste 2015; 17: 540-546
  2. Baker CJL, Eden A. Studies on the oxalate contents of the leaves of certain varieties of Beta vulgaris. J Agric Sci 1954; 44: 394-399
  3. Cho JG, Gebhart CJ, Furrow E, Lulich JP. Assessment of in vitro oxalate degradation by Lactobacillus species cultured from veterinary probiotics. Am J Vet Res 2015; 76: 801-806
  4. Malavanh C, Preston TR, Ogle B. Ensiling leaves of Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Shott) with sugar cane molasses. Livest Res Rural Dev 2008; 20
  5. Gebrehanna MM, Gordon RJ, Madani A, VanderZaag AC, Wood JD. Silage effluent management: a review. J Environ Manage 2014; 143: 113-122
  6. Münnich M, Khiaosaard R, Klevenhusen F, Hilpold A, Khol- Parisini A, Zebeli Q. A meta-analysis of feeding sugar beet pulp in dairy cows: effects on feed intake, ruminal fermentation, performance, and net food production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017; 224: 78-89
  7. Moore CA, Kennedy SJ. The effect of sugar beet pulp-based silage additives on effluent production, fermentation, in-silo losses, silage intake and animal performance. Grass Forage Sci 1994; 49: 54-64
  8. Balakhial A, Naserian A, Heravi Moussavi A, Eftekhar Shahrodi F, Valizadeh R. Changes in chemical composition and in vitro DM digestibility of urea and molasses treated whole crop canola silage. J Anim Vet Adv 2008; 7: 1042-1044
  9. Romero-Huelva M, Ramírez-Fenosa MA, Planelles-González R, García-Casado P, Molina-Alcaide E. Can by-products replace conventional ingredients in concentrate of dairy goat diet? J Dairy Sci 2017; 100: 4500-4512
  10. Muck RE, Weinberg ZG, Contreras-Govea FE. Silage extracts used to study the mode of action of silage inoculants in ruminants. Agric Food Sci 2013; 22: 108-114
  11. Wang J, Chen L, Yuan X, Guo G, Li J, Bai Y, Shao T. Effects of molasses on the fermentation characteristics of mixed silage prepared with rice straw, local vegetable by-products and alfalfa in Southeast China. J Integr Agric 2017; 16: 664-670
  12. Kromann RP, Meyer JH, Stielau WJ. Steam distillation of volatile fatty acids in rumen ingesta. J Dairy Sci 1967; 50: 73- 76
  13. Menke K., Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Develop 1988; 28: 7-55
  14. Association of Official Analytical Chemists I