KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Differences in drone sperm morphometry and activity at the beginning and end of the season

Dorota BANASZEWSKA
Aldona GONTARZ
Magdalena GRYZINSKA
Katarzyna ANDRASZEK
Sayfa
598–602
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Staining in this manner clearly identifies the sperm nucleus and structurally differentiates the tail.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The sperm cells of the honey bee, like the sperm of most invertebrates, belong to the modified type of spermatozoa.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Experimental AgNO3 staining differentiated the sperm head into the acrosomal part (darkly stained) and the distal part (lightly stained).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Staining in this manner clearly identifies the sperm nucleus and structurally differentiates the tail.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The sperm cells of the honey bee, like the sperm of most invertebrates, belong to the modified type of spermatozoa. In our own research, differences have been observed in the activity of sperm cells isolated from drones at the beginning and end of the season. On the basis of these observations, research was undertaken to determine whether the changes in drone activity are associated with morphological changes. The sperm cells collected from drones at the beginning of the mating season are longer than the sperm cells from the end of the season. Moreover, sperm cells from the beginning of the season exhibited more intensive rotational motion than those collected at the end of the season. Experimental AgNO3 staining differentiated the sperm head into the acrosomal part (darkly stained) and the distal part (lightly stained). Staining in this manner clearly identifies the sperm nucleus and structurally differentiates the tail.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BANASZEWSKA, D., GONTARZ, A., GRYZINSKA, M., ANDRASZEK, K. (2022). Differences in drone sperm morphometry and activity at the beginning and end of the season. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 598–602. https://ajindex.com/articles/615129

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Koeniger G, Koeniger N, Fabritius M. Some detailed observations of mating in the honeybee. Bee World 1979; 60: 53-57
  2. Skowronek W, Kruk C, Loc K. The insemination of queen honeybees with diluted semen. Apidologie 1995; 26: 487-493
  3. Mackensen O. Effect of diluents and temperature on instrumental insemination of queen honey bees. J Econ Ent 1969; 62: 1370-1372
  4. Woyke J. Factors that determine the number of spermatozoa in the spermatheca of naturally mated queens. Ztschr Bienenforsch 1966; 8: 236-247
  5. Harbo JR. Instrumental insemination of queen bees – part 1. Amer Bee J 1985; 125: 197-202
  6. Collins AM, Donoghue AM. Viability assessment of honey bee, Apis mellifera, sperm using dual fluorescent staining. Theriogenology 1999; 51: 1513-1523
  7. Rhodes JW, Harden S, Spooner-Hart R, Anderson DL, Wheen G. Effect of age, season and genetics on semen and sperm production in Apis mellifera drones. Apidologie 2011; 42: 29-38
  8. Hellmich RL, Kulincevic JM, Rothenbuhler WC. Selection for high and low pollen-hoarding honey bees. J Heredity 1985; 76: 155-158
  9. Bishop GH. Fertilization in the honeybee, I. The male sexual organs: their histological structure and physiological functioning. J Exp Zool 1920; 31: 225-265
  10. Page RE. Sperm utilization in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 1986; 31: 297-320
  11. Kondracki S, Banaszewska D, Mielnicka C. The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). Cell Mol Biol Lett 2005; 10: 3-13
  12. Andraszek K, Smalec E. The use of silver nitrate for the identification of spermatozoon structure in selected mammals. Can J Anim Sci 2011; 91: 239-246
  13. Andraszek K, Banaszewska D, Czubaszek M, Wójcik E, Szostek M. Comparison of different chromatin staining techniques for bull sperm. Archiv Tierzucht 2014; 57: 1-15
  14. Andraszek K, Banaszewska D, Wójcik E, Szostek M, Czubaszek M, Walczak-Jędrzejowska R. The use of silver nitrate for the assessment of seminologic semen parameters in selected farm and wild animal species. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2014; 58: 487-494
  15. Garner DL, Johnson LA, Yue ST, Roth B, Haugland RP. Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. J Androl 1994; 15: 620-629
  16. Thomas TH, Garner DL. Post-thaw bovine spermatozoa quality estimated from fresh samples. J Androl 1994; 15: 489-500
  17. Phillips DM. Insect sperm, their structure and morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 1970; 44: 243-277
  18. Lensky Y, Ben-David E, Schindl