Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

The prevalence of Clostridium perfringens in retail meat of Mardan, Pakistan

Sayfa
618–623
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It indicates that this pathogen isprevalent in various meat sources in Mardan and could be a threat to public health.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The most prevailing bacteria in distribution is Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) which is ranked 1st among fatal diseasesin small ruminants.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the present study, a cross-sectional study was performed to sort out the prevalence of C. perfringens types estimation in variousretail meats and areas of Mardan district, Pakistan. 600 fresh meat samples (equally from cows, sheep and goats) were collected fromretail shops.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It indicates that this pathogen isprevalent in various meat sources in Mardan and could be a threat to public health.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The most prevailing bacteria in distribution is Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) which is ranked 1st among fatal diseasesin small ruminants. This rapidly growing food borne pathogen is present in water, food, soil, air, and humans and animals intestinaltract. In the present study, a cross-sectional study was performed to sort out the prevalence of C. perfringens types estimation in variousretail meats and areas of Mardan district, Pakistan. 600 fresh meat samples (equally from cows, sheep and goats) were collected fromretail shops. C. perfringens was diagnosed in various types of meat however highest prevalence was found in goats 174/200 (87%)followed by sheep 103/200 (51.5%) while the least prevalence was in cow meat 89/200 (44.5%). All obtained isolates were furthergenotyped through multiplex PCR indicating 93/174 (53.45%) C. perfringens type A, 16/174 (9.19%) type B, 3/174 (1.72%) type C and62/174 (35.63%) type D in goat isolates. 53/103 (51.46%) C. perfringens type A, 11/103 (10.68%) type B, 3/103 (2.91%) type C and 36/103(34.95%) type D in sheep isolates. 73/89 (82.02%) C. perfringens type A, 9/89 (10.11%) type D and 7/89 (7.86%) type E in cow isolates.Out of 89 cow meat isolates 4 (4.49%) carried cpe gene, 16 (17.98%) contained cpb2 gene and 1 (1.12%) carried both cpe and cpb2 genes.In 103 sheep meat isolates, 2 (1.94%) carried cpe gene, 8 (7.77%) carried cpb2 gene and 3 (2.91%) carried both cpe and cpb2 genes. In174 goat’s meat isolates, 3 (1.72%) carried cpe gene, 18 (10.34%) carried cpb2 gene while (1.72%) carried both cpe and cpb2 genes. Whileanalyzing prevalence in months and area wise, no significance was observed through chi-square test. It indicates that this pathogen isprevalent in various meat sources in Mardan and could be a threat to public health.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KHAN, M. A., KHAN, S. B., KHAN, I. U., SULTAN, A., KHAN, R., SHAHID, M., AQIB, A. I., KHAN, S., KHAN, A. Z., HASSAN, M. (2022). The prevalence of Clostridium perfringens in retail meat of Mardan, Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 618–623. https://ajindex.com/articles/615123

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Sohaib M, Jamil F. An insight of meat industry in Pakistan with special reference to halal meat: a comprehensive review. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 2017; 37 (3): 329
  2. Brynestad S, Granum PE. Clostridium perfringens and foodborne infections. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2002; 74 (3): 195-202
  3. Lindström M, Heikinheimo A, Lahti P, Korkeala H. Novel insights into the epidemiology of Clostridium perfringens type A food poisoning. Food Microbiology 2011; 28 (2): 192-198
  4. Wahl E, Rømma S, Granum P. A Clostridium perfringens outbreak traced to temperature-abused beef stew, Norway, 2012. Eurosurveillance 2013; 18 (9): 20408
  5. Aras Z, Hadimli HH. Detection and molecular typing of Clostridium perfringens isolates from beef, chicken and turkey meats. Anaerobe 2015; 32: 15-17
  6. Uzal F. Diagnosis of Clostridium perfringens intestinal infections in sheep and goats. Anaerobe 2004; 10 (2): 135-143
  7. Uzal FA, Songer JG. Diagnosis of Clostridium perfringens intestinal infections in sheep and goats. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2008; 20 (3): 253-265
  8. Petit L, Gibert M, Popoff MR. Clostridium perfringens: toxinotype and genotype. Trends in Microbiology 1999; 7 (3): 104-110
  9. Garmory H, Chanter N, French N, Bueschel D, Songer J et al. Occurrence of Clostridium perfringens β2-toxin amongst animals, determined using genotyping and subtyping PCR assays. Epidemiology & Infection 2000; 124 (1): 61-67
  10. Smedley J, Fisher D, Sayeed S, Chakrabarti G, McClane B. The enteric toxins of Clostridium perfringens. Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2004. pp. 183-204
  11. Songer JG. Clostridial enteric diseases of domestic animals. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1996; 9 (2): 216
  12. Guran HS, Vural A, Erkan ME. The prevalence and molecular typing of Clostridium perfringens in ground beef and sheep meats. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 2014; 9 (2): 121-128
  13. Kalender H, Ertas H, Cetinkaya B, Muz A, Arslan N et al. Typing of isolates of Clostridium perfringens from healthy and diseased sheep by multiplex PCR. Veterinarni Medicina-Praha 2005; 50 (10): 439
  14. Khan MA, Durrani AZ, Khan SB, Khan MA, Sheikh AA et al. Association between bacterial strain type and host biomarkers in Clostridium perfringens infected goats. Microbial Pathogenesis 2017; 112: 254-258
  15. Wen Q, McClane BA. Detection of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens type A