Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

In vitro culture of in vivo Saanen goat embryos by vitrification

Sayfa
603–608
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, it was concluded that the embryos to be frozen should be selected according to their development stage and quality, and preferably should be of Grade 1 quality in the blastocyst stage for the cryopreservation of in vivo-derived goat embryos by vitrification.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival rate of high-quality embryos (n: 101) derived in vivo from Saanen goats (n: 15) in culture following their vitrified freezing and thawing during the breeding season.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The in vitro postthaw survival rates of 101 vitrified embryos at 24, 48, and 72 h were 59.4%, 33.6%, and 25.7%, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, it was concluded that the embryos to be frozen should be selected according to their development stage and quality, and preferably should be of Grade 1 quality in the blastocyst stage for the cryopreservation of in vivo-derived goat embryos by vitrification.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival rate of high-quality embryos (n: 101) derived in vivo from Saanen goats (n: 15) in culture following their vitrified freezing and thawing during the breeding season. The in vitro postthaw survival rates of 101 vitrified embryos at 24, 48, and 72 h were 59.4%, 33.6%, and 25.7%, respectively. According to the developmental stage of the embryos, the survival rates were 51.3%, 20.5%, and 15.4% in the morula, and 64.5%, 41.9%, and 32.3% in the blastocyst, respectively. The survival rates of the blastocysts and morulae at 48 and 72 h were significantly different (P < 0.05). While the survival rates of the embryos of Grade 1 quality at 24, 48, and 72 h were 78.6%, 46.4%, and 32.1%, Grade 2 quality survival rates were 35.5%, 17.8%, and 17.8%, respectively. The survival rates of Grades 1 and 2 embryos at 24 h (P < 0.001) and 48 h (P < 0.05) were significantly different. As a result, it was concluded that the embryos to be frozen should be selected according to their development stage and quality, and preferably should be of Grade 1 quality in the blastocyst stage for the cryopreservation of in vivo-derived goat embryos by vitrification.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖSE, A. M., TEKELİ, T. (2022). In vitro culture of in vivo Saanen goat embryos by vitrification. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 603–608. https://ajindex.com/articles/615107

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Kaymaz M. Yardımcı üreme teknikleri. In: Semacan A, Kaymaz M, Fındık M, Rişvanlı A, Köker A, editors. Çiftlik Hayvanlarında Doğum ve İnfertilite. 1st ed. Malatya, Turkey: Medipres; 2012. pp. 695-811
  2. Pereira RM, Marques CC. Animal oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Cell Tissue Bank 2008; 9: 267-277
  3. Gama LT, Bressan MC. Biotechnology applications for the sustainable management of goat genetic resources. Small Rumin Res 2011; 98: 133-146
  4. Amiridis GS, Cseh S. Assisted reproductive technologies in the reproductive management of small ruminants. Anim Reprod Sci 2012; 130: 152-161
  5. Verma OP, Kumar R, Kumar A, Chard S. Assisted reproductive techniques in farm animal from artificial insemination to nanobiotechnology. Vet World 2012; 5: 301-310
  6. Vajta G. Vitrification of the oocytes and embryos of domestic animals. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 60-61: 357-364
  7. Massip A. Cryopreservation of embryos of farm animals. Reprod Dom Anim 2001; 36: 49-55
  8. Sağırkaya H, Bağış H. Memeli embriyolarının kriyoprezervasyonu. Uludağ Univ J Fac Vet Med 2003; 22: 127-135
  9. Kanagawa H, Shimohira I, Saitoh N. Manual of Bovine Embryo Transfer. 1st ed. Japan: Japan Livestock Technology Association; 1995. pp. 259-315
  10. Uysal O. Sığır embriyolarının vitrifikasyonu. Vet Hekim Der Derg 2007; 78: 45-50
  11. Aminoor Rahman AN, Abdullah R, Wan Khadijah WE. A review of reproductive biotechnologies and their application in goat. Biotechnology 2008; 7: 371-384
  12. Gibbons A, Cueto M. Embryo Transfer in Sheep and Goats. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Bariloche Experimental Station. National Institute for Agricultural Technology; 2011. pp. 1-33
  13. Vajta G, Kuwayama M. Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 236-244
  14. Gajda B, Smorag Z. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation - State of art and recent developments in domestic animals. J Anim Feed Sci 2009; 18: 371-387
  15. Noakes ED, Parkinson TJ, England GCW, Arthur GH. Embryo transfer in large domestic animals. In: Noakes ED, Parkinson TJ, England GCW, Arthur GH, editors. Arthur’s Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics. 8th ed. Oxford, UK: W.B. Saunders; 2001. pp. 819-836
  16. Cognie Y, Baril G, Poulin N, Mermillod P. Current status of embryo technologies in sheep and goat. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 171-188
  17. Flores-Foxworth G. Reproductive biotechnologies in the goat. In: Yongquist RS, Threlfall WR, editors. Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenelogy. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: W.B. Saunders; 2007. pp