Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Chemical, enzymatic, and antioxidant enrichments of full-fat soybean and sunflower meal by Bacillus subtilis (ATCC® 6633™) fermentation using a solid-state bioreactor

Sayfa
82–93
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thesefeed materials could be used as functional feed additives or feed materials in farm animal nutrition.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted to fortify nutritional and chemical composition of sunflower meal (SFM) and full-fat soybean(FFSB) used as a protein source in farm animal nutrition by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 fermentation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:An optimized set of fermentationparameters (60% moisture, 6.5–7.0 pH, 30–35 °C temperature, continuous aeration of 0.5–1.0 L/min and agitation of 20–100 rpm) wereused to ferment SFM and FFSB samples with or without using bacterial inoculant for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thesefeed materials could be used as functional feed additives or feed materials in farm animal nutrition.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study was conducted to fortify nutritional and chemical composition of sunflower meal (SFM) and full-fat soybean(FFSB) used as a protein source in farm animal nutrition by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 fermentation. An optimized set of fermentationparameters (60% moisture, 6.5–7.0 pH, 30–35 °C temperature, continuous aeration of 0.5–1.0 L/min and agitation of 20–100 rpm) wereused to ferment SFM and FFSB samples with or without using bacterial inoculant for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. The results indicated that thetotal organic acids (TOA) contents and crude ash (CA) of SFM and FFSB increased significantly, but there were significant reductionsin dietary fiber (DF) components (acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF)) in both feed samples. Moreover,urease activity, trypsin inhibitors (TI), and phytic acid (PA) contents of both feed samples reduced by 50%, 35%, and 79%, respectively.Total flavonoid level reduced by 30% in FFSB samples, but remained unchanged in SFM samples. The levels of tannin in FFSB andSFM decreased significantly. Although there were no significant changes in the activities of amylase, celulase, and beta-glucanase; theprotease and phytase activities increased significantly. The total phenolic compounds content and the antioxidant activities of FFSB andSFM samples increased significantly. In conclusion, the fermented FFSB (F-FFSB) and fermented SFM (FSFM) had lowered the levels ofADF, NDF, tannin, TI, urease activity, and PA but they were remarkably enriched with organic acids, enzymes, and antioxidants. Thesefeed materials could be used as functional feed additives or feed materials in farm animal nutrition.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAKURT, Y., TOSUN, R., ÇELİK, C., GÜVERCİN, D., ÖNDER, S., YAŞAR, S., BARAN, B. (2022). Chemical, enzymatic, and antioxidant enrichments of full-fat soybean and sunflower meal by Bacillus subtilis (ATCC® 6633™) fermentation using a solid-state bioreactor. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 82–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/614874

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Anonymous. American soybean association. Soy stats 2017. http://www.soystats.com/2012, accessed 1st May 2012
  2. Heuzé V, Tran G, Hassoun P, Lessire M, Lebas F. Sunflower meal. Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/732Last updated on September 1; 2016; 15:14
  3. Dunsford BR, Knabe DA, Hacnsly WE. Effect of dietary soybean meal on the microscopic anatomy of the small intestine in the early-weaned pig. Journal of Animal Science 1989; 67: 1855-1864
  4. Li DF, Nelssen JL, Reddy PG, Blecha F, Hancock JD, Allee G, Goodband RD, Klemm RD. Transient hypersensitivity to soybean meal in the early-weaned pig. Journal of Animal Science 1990; 68: 1790-1799
  5. Song YS, Frias J, Martinez-Villaluenga C, Vidal-Valdeverde C, De-Mejia, EG. Immunoreactivity reduction of soybean meal by fermentation, effect on amino acid composition and antigenicity of commercial soy products. Food Chemistry 2008; 108: 571-581
  6. Kwon IH, Kim MH, Yun CH, Go JY, Lee CH, Lee HJ, Phipek W, Ha JK. Effects of fermented soybean meal on immune response of weaned calves with experimentally induced lipopolysaccharide challenge. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2011; 24: 957-964
  7. Yuan YC, Lin YC, Yang HJ, Gong Y, Gong SY, Yu DH. Evaluation of fermented soybean meal in the practical diets for juvenile Chinese sucker, Myxocyprinusasiaticus. Aquaculture Nutrition 2013; 19: 74-83
  8. Mukherjee R, Chakraborty R, Dutta A. Role of fermentation in improving nutritional quality of soybean meal—a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2016; 29: 1523- 1529
  9. Amadou I, Le GW, Shi YH, Jin S. Reducing, radical scavenging, and chelation properties of fermented soy protein meal hydrolysate by Lactobacillus plantarum Lp6. International Journal of Food Properties 2011; 14: 654-665
  10. Teng D, Gao M, Yang Y, Liu B, Tian Z, Wang J. Bio-modification of soybean meal with Bacillus subtilis or Aspergillus oryzae. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2012; 1: 32-38
  11. Kook MC, Cho SC, Hong YH, Park H. Bacillus subtilis fermentation for enhancement of feed nutritive value of soybean meal. Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry 2014; 57: 183-188
  12. Baurin DV, Gordienko MG, Shakir IV, Panfilov VI. Integrated processing of sunflower meal. 14th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference. Albena, Bulgaria: SGEM; 2014. pp. 419-426
  13. Camargo D, Gomes SD, Sene L. Ethanol production from sunflower meal biomass by simultaneous