Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5

Impact of light-emitting diode and compact fluorescent light source type and cage tier on layers reared in an enriched cage system Part 1: Production performance and egg quality

Sayfa
615–626
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It can be concluded that the hens in the FLO group were better than the LED groupin terms of some production and egg quality traits.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study’s aim was to investigate the effects of age, light source type (light-emitting diode (LED), and compact fluorescent(FLO)), and cage tier on production performance and egg quality traits of layers reared in the enriched cage system.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 800 NickChick White layers were used in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It can be concluded that the hens in the FLO group were better than the LED groupin terms of some production and egg quality traits.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study’s aim was to investigate the effects of age, light source type (light-emitting diode (LED), and compact fluorescent(FLO)), and cage tier on production performance and egg quality traits of layers reared in the enriched cage system. A total of 800 NickChick White layers were used in the study. A total of 800 eggs were used for egg quality traits at 25 and 45 weeks of age. The enrichedcage tiers were coded as I, II, III, and IV from bottom to top. Layer age significantly affected egg mass, hen-day egg production rate,hen-house egg production rate, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio, damaged egg ratio (P < 0.05), egg weight, shape index, shellthickness, albumen weight, yolk weight, shell weight, yolk color index, albumen ratio, yolk ratio, and shell ratio (P < 0.001). The higheregg mass, egg weight, albumen weight, yolk weight, shell thickness (P < 0.001), dirty egg ratio (P < 0.01), and lower FCR, yolk colorindex (P < 0.01), shell ratio (P < 0.01) were found in the FLO group when compared to the LED group (P < 0.05). Highest body weightwas found in cage tier I at 45 weeks of age (P < 0.001). Level of cage tier significantly affected 50% egg production age, egg mass, hendayegg production rate, hen-house egg production rate, and dirty egg ratio (P < 0.01). Level of cage tier significantly affected 5% eggproduction age, FCR, and shape index (P < 0.05). It can be concluded that the hens in the FLO group were better than the LED groupin terms of some production and egg quality traits.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİKMEN, B. Y., TÜNAYDIN, G. (2022). Impact of light-emitting diode and compact fluorescent light source type and cage tier on layers reared in an enriched cage system Part 1: Production performance and egg quality. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5, 615–626. https://ajindex.com/articles/614862

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Borille R, Garcia RG, Royer AFB, Santana MR, Colet S et al. The use of light-emitting diodes (LED) in commercial layer production. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 2013; 15 (2): 135-140. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2013000200009 2. Long H, Zhao Y, Wang T, Ning Z, Xin H. Effect of lightemitting diode vs. fluorescent lighting on laying hens in aviary hen houses: Part 1 – operational characteristics of lights and production traits of hens. Poultry Science 2016a; 95 (1): 1-11. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev121 3. Long H, Zhao Y, Xin H, Hansen H, Ning Z et al. Effect of lightemitting diode (LED) vs. fluorescent (FL) lighting on laying hens in aviary hen houses: Part 2 – Egg quality, shelf-life and lipid composition. Poultry Science 2016b; 95 (1): 115-124. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev306 4. Bayraktar H, Altan A. Effects of light wavelength on broiler performance. Journal of Animal Production 2005; 46 (2): 22- 32 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). 5. Rubinoff I. A practical guide to poultry lighting. Hy-Line International®; 2016. 6. Gallegos K, Archer GS. Comparison of the effect of lightemitting diode (LED) versus compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) lighting on hen production, egg quality, fear, and stress. Poultry Science 2014; 93 (E-Suppl. 1): 95. 7. Kamanlı S, Durmuş I, Demir S, Tarım B. Effect of different light sources on performance and egg quality traits in laying hens. Archiv Fur Geflügelkunde 2015; 79:109-115. doi: 10.1399/ eps.2015.109 8. Liu K, Xin H, Sekhon J, Wang T. Effect of fluorescent vs. poultry-specific light-emitting diode lights on production performance and egg quality of W-36 laying hens. Poultry Science 2018; 97 (3): 834-844. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex371 9. Archer GS. Comparing the effect of different types of lighting on broiler production, fear, and stress. Poultry Science 2014; 93 (E-Suppl. 1): 95. 10. İpek A, Şahan Ü, Yılmaz B. The effect of cage position and stock density on the egg production and quality characteristics. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi 2002; 4 (1-2): 8-12. (in Turkish with an abstract in English). 11. Vits A, Weitzenburger D, Hamann H, Distl O. Influence of different tiers in furnished cages and small group system on production traits, mortality, egg quality, bone strength claw length and keel bone deformities. Archiv Fur Geflügelkunde 2006; 70 (4):145-154. 12. Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Hunt DM. Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds. Vision Research 1997; 37 (16): 2183-2194. doi: