Effects of various Toxeat® concentrations on growth performance, immune response, cecal microflora, and gut morphology in broilers fed with aflatoxin contaminated diets
Finally, Toxeat®administration (1–2 kg/ton) resulted in the best growth performance and immunity.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted to investigate the effects of Toxeat®, a mycotoxin binder, on functional indices, immune response,intestinal microflora, and gut morphology in broiler chickens fed aflatoxin-contaminated diets.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Three hundred Cobb 500 broilers wererandomly divided into 6 treatments with 5 replicates, each with 10 birds.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, Toxeat®administration (1–2 kg/ton) resulted in the best growth performance and immunity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of Toxeat®, a mycotoxin binder, on functional indices, immune response,intestinal microflora, and gut morphology in broiler chickens fed aflatoxin-contaminated diets. Three hundred Cobb 500 broilers wererandomly divided into 6 treatments with 5 replicates, each with 10 birds. The treatments included T1: negative control (NC), T2: T1 +1 g/ton aflatoxin (positive control: PC), T3: PC + 1 kg/ton Toxeat®, T4: PC + 2 kg/ton Toxeat®, T5: PC + 3 kg/ton Toxeat®, T6: PC + 1 kg/ton Toxeat® without hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate. Growth performance, immune system response, and lactic acid bacteria(LAB) count decreased in the PC group (P 0.05). Finally, Toxeat®administration (1–2 kg/ton) resulted in the best growth performance and immunity.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
HOSSEINI, S. A., JAFARI, P., SARRAMI, S., EBRAHIMI, M. T., MOUSAVI, S. N. (2022). Effects of various Toxeat® concentrations on growth performance, immune response, cecal microflora, and gut morphology in broilers fed with aflatoxin contaminated diets. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 299–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/614845
Neeff DV, Ledoux DR, Rottinghaus GE, Bermudez AJ, Dakovic A et al. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate to bind and reduce aflatoxin residues in tissues of broiler chicks fed aflatoxin B1. Poultry Science 2013; 92 (1): 131-137. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02510 2. Celik I, Oguz H, Demet O, Donmez HH, Boydak M et al. Efficacy of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone in reducing the immunotoxicity of aflatoxin in growing broilers. British Poultry Science 2000; 41 (4): 430-439. doi: 10.1080/713654954 3. Galarza-Seeber R, Latorre JD, Bielke LR, Kuttappan VA, Wolfenden AD et al. Leaky gut and mycotoxins: aflatoxin B1 does not increase gut permeability in broiler chickens. Frontiers in Veterinary science 2016; 3: 1-8. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00010 4. Peltonen K, El-Nezami H, Haskard C, Ahokas J, Salminen S. Aflatoxin B1 binding by dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Journal of dairy science 2001; 84 (10): 2152- 2156. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74660-7 5. Jindal N, Mahipal SK, Mahajan NK. Toxicity of aflatoxin B1 in broiler chicks and its reduction by activated charcoal. Research in Veterinary Science 1994; 56 (1): 37-40. doi: 10.1016/0034- 5288(94)90193-7 6. Shariatmadari F. The application of zeolite in poultry production. World›s Poultry Science Journal 2008; 64 (1): 76- 84. doi: 10.1017/S0043933907001730 7. Bagherzadeh Kasmani F, Karimi Torshizi MA, Allameh A, Shariatmadari F. A novel aflatoxin-binding Bacillus probiotic: performance, serum biochemistry, and immunological parameters in Japanese quail. Poultry Science 2012; 91 (8): 1846-1853. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01830 8. Boudergue C, Burel C, Dragacci S, Favrot MC, Fremy JM et al. Review of mycotoxin‐detoxifying agents used as feed additives: mode of action, efficacy and feed/food safety. EFSA Supporting Publications 2009; 6 (9): 1-192. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2009.EN-22 9. Green AA, Sainsbury DWB. The role of probiotic in producing quality poultry products. In: XV European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat; Kusadasi, Turkey; 2001. pp. 9-12. 10. Gunal M, Yayli G, Kaya O, Karahan N, Sulak O. The effects of antibiotic growth promoter, probiotic or organic acid supplementation on performance, intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science 2006; 5 (2): 149-155. 11. Khaksefidi A, Ghoorchi T. Effect of probiotic on performance and immunocompetence in broiler chicks. The Journal of Poultry Science 2006; 43 (3): 296-300. doi: 1