Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Microsatellite panels for parentage testing of Kilis goats reared in Turkey

Sayfa
94–101
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of this study, it can be stated that panels with 0.999 CPE values canbe used at the most reasonable cost and with high reliability in paternity tests to be performed in Kilis goats, which can be a referencefor other populations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to develop PCR-based suitable microsatellite marker panels for paternity testing and to definepedigree errors in Kilis goats.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 137 head of goats were used, consisting of 118 head of kids and 19 head of possible candidatesires.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of this study, it can be stated that panels with 0.999 CPE values canbe used at the most reasonable cost and with high reliability in paternity tests to be performed in Kilis goats, which can be a referencefor other populations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop PCR-based suitable microsatellite marker panels for paternity testing and to definepedigree errors in Kilis goats. A total of 137 head of goats were used, consisting of 118 head of kids and 19 head of possible candidatesires. A total of 392 alleles were observed in 22 microsatellite markers. Allele numbers ranged between 12 (SRCRSP7) and 24 (BM1818,INRA0023, and SRCRSP15) with an average of 17.82. The mean value of the effective allele numbers was obtained as 9.44. The overallpolymorphic information content value was quite high (0.88). The overall observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) values for allstudied loci were 0.89 and 0.89, respectively. Paternity test panels for the Kilis goat population studied were created based on individualprobability of exclusion of microsatellites in multiplex groups. Combined probability of exclusion (CPE) values for different panelsranged between 0.745 (Panel-1) and 0.9999 (Panel-22), while the combined identification probability (CPI) values were obtained in therange of 9.81 × 10–3 (Panel-1) to 6.96 × 10–21 (Panel-22). As a result of this study, it can be stated that panels with 0.999 CPE values canbe used at the most reasonable cost and with high reliability in paternity tests to be performed in Kilis goats, which can be a referencefor other populations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖNEL, S. E., CEMAL, İ., ATA, N., YILMAZ, O., KARACA, O., GÜNDÜZ, Z., GÜL, S., KESKİN, M. (2022). Microsatellite panels for parentage testing of Kilis goats reared in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 94–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/614842

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Baron EE, Martinez ML, Vernequez RS, Coutinho LL. Parentage testing and effect of misidentification on the estimation of breeding value in Gir cattle. Genet Mol Biol 2002; 25: 389-394
  2. Taylor GR. Laboratory Methods for the Detection of Mutations and Polymorphisms in DNA. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 1997
  3. Parlato E, Van Vleck LD. Effect of parentage misidentification on estimates of genetic parameters for milk yield in the Mediterranean Italian buffalo population. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 4059-4064
  4. Weller JI, Feldmesser E, Golik M, Tager CI, Domochovsky R, Alus O, Ezra E, Ron M. Factors affecting incorrect paternity assignment in the Israeli Holstein population. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 2627-2640
  5. Yılmaz O, Karaca O. Paternity analysis with microsatellite markers in Karya sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fac 2012; 18: 807- 813
  6. Yılmaz O. Power of different microsatellite panels for paternity analysis in sheep. Anim Sci Pap Rep 2016; 34: 155-164
  7. Bulut Z, Kurar E, Özşensoy Y, Altınok V, Nizamoğlu M. Usefulness of microsatellite DNA markers for parentage testing for some goat population in Turkey. J Cell Molbiol 2014; 12: 39-45
  8. Karaca O, Yılmaz O, Ata N, Sevim S, Cemal I. Paternity testing for verification of pedigree ınformation obtained from handmated Hair goats. In: Proceedings of International Agricultural Science Congress; Van, Turkey; 2018. p. 147
  9. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1988; 16: 1215
  10. Montgomery GW, Sise JA. Extraction of DNA from sheep white blood cells. New Zeal J Agr Res 1990; 33: 437-441
  11. FAO. Molecular Genetic Characterization of Animal Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2011
  12. Hecker KH, Roux KH. High and low annealing temperatures increase both specificity and yield in touchdown and stepdown PCR. Biotechniques 1996; 20: 478-485
  13. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 2012; 28: 2537-2539
  14. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 1998; 7: 639-655
  15. Brenner C, Morris CJ. Paternity Index Calculations in Single Locus Hypervariable DNA Probes: Validation and Other Studies. PowerStatsV12.xls Computer Software; 1990
  16. Paetkau D, Strobeck C. The mole