Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of antioxidant activity of bee products of different bee races in Turkey

Sayfa
441–447
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When bee races were compared, it was seen that flora is a more effective factor than bee race for antioxidantcapacity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bee products with high bioactive properties have a very important place in human nutrition.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Besides the determining of total polyphenol and totalflavonoid contents, the antioxidant capacity was investigated by three different assays: DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radicalscavengingactivities, CUPRAC (cupric reducing antioxidant capacity) and FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When bee races were compared, it was seen that flora is a more effective factor than bee race for antioxidantcapacity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Bee products with high bioactive properties have a very important place in human nutrition. Biochemical properties ofthese products such as honey, pollen, and propolis vary according to flora, season, bee race, and production methods. In this study, thebiological activities of honey, bee pollen, and propolis samples from four bee races in Turkey (Apis mellifera caucasica, Apis melliferaanatoliaca, Apis mellifera syriaca, and Apis mellifera carnica) were examined. Besides the determining of total polyphenol and totalflavonoid contents, the antioxidant capacity was investigated by three different assays: DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radicalscavengingactivities, CUPRAC (cupric reducing antioxidant capacity) and FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power). The rank orderof antioxidant potencies was as follows in the four bee races: propolis > pollen > honey. The polyphenol content of the products wasevaluated and Apis mellifera syriaca for honey, Apis mellifera anatoliaca for pollen, and Apis mellifera carnica for propolis were foundhigher than the others. When bee races were compared, it was seen that flora is a more effective factor than bee race for antioxidantcapacity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARAL, Ö., YILDIZ, O., ŞAHİN, H., KILIÇARSLAN, M., DİNÇER, B. (2022). Evaluation of antioxidant activity of bee products of different bee races in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 441–447. https://ajindex.com/articles/614840

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Tan A. Current status of plant genetic resources conservation in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on In Situ Conservation of Genetic Diversity; Turkey; 1998. pp. 5-16
  2. Ruttner F. Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1988
  3. Anklam E. A review of the analytical methods to determine the geographical and botanical origin of honey. Food Chemistry 1998; 63 (4): 549-562
  4. Al-Amary M, Al-Meeri, Al-Habori M. Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of different types of honey. Nutrition Research 2002; 22 (9): 1041-1047
  5. Bankova VS, Castro SL, Marcucci MC. Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 2000; 31 (1): 3-15
  6. Santos FA, Bastos EM, Uzeda M, Carvalho MA, Farias LM et al. Antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis and fractions against oral anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2002; 80 (1): 1-7
  7. Marcucci MC, Ferreres F, Garcia-Viguera C, Bankova VS, De Castro SL et al. Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propolis with pharmacological activities. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2001; 74 (2): 105-112
  8. Ahn MR, Kunimasa K, Ohta T, Kumazawa S, Kamihira M et al. Suppression of tumor-induced angiogenesis by Brazilian propolis: major component artepillin C inhibits in vitro tube formation and endothelial cell proliferation. Cancer Letter 2007; 252 (2): 235-243
  9. Cottica SM, Sawaya ACHF, Eberlin MN, Franco SL, Zeoula LM et al. Antioxidant activity and composition of propolis obtained by different methods of extraction. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society 2011; 22 (5): 929-935
  10. Campos MG, Webby RF, Markham KR, Mitchell KA, Da Cunha AP. Age-induced diminution of free radical scavenging capacity in bee pollens and the contribution of constituent flavonoids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2003; 51 (3): 742-745
  11. Bonvehi SJ, Torrento SM, Lorente CE. Evaluation of polyphenolic and flavonoid compounds in honeybee-collected pollen produced in Spain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2001; 49 (4): 1848-1853
  12. Yamaguchi I, Tsuji T. The detection of bioactive components of the powder of bee pollen. Bulletin of Tokyo Kasei University 2002; 42: 111-114
  13. Garcia M, Perez-Arquillue C, Juan T, Juan MI, Herrera A. Pollen analysis and antibacterial activity of Spanish honeys. Food Science and Technology International 2001; 7 (2): 155- 158
  14. Proestos C, Chorianopoulos N, Nychas GJ, Komaitis M. RPHPLC analysis of the phenolic compounds of p