Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Productive response to two concentrate allocation strategies in dairy cows grazing with restricted pasture allowance

Sayfa
1–9
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The prioritization of milkproduction rather than the attenuation of body reserve mobilization suggests that concentrate allowance based on lactation stage maybe unsuitable for minimizing the negative energy balance in early lactation cows.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The objective of this study was to compare the effects of two concentrate allotment strategies on the performance of dairy cowsgrazing on restricted pasture and supplemented with conserved forage.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Dairy cows fed equal amounts of concentrate (fixed daily rate:5.5 kg DM/cow) were compared to cows supplemented with concentrate according to their lactation stage as follows: 10.0, 5.0, and 1.5kg DM/cow daily during early, mid, and late lactation, respectively (average daily dose: 5.5 kg DM/cow).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The prioritization of milkproduction rather than the attenuation of body reserve mobilization suggests that concentrate allowance based on lactation stage maybe unsuitable for minimizing the negative energy balance in early lactation cows.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of two concentrate allotment strategies on the performance of dairy cowsgrazing on restricted pasture and supplemented with conserved forage. Dairy cows fed equal amounts of concentrate (fixed daily rate:5.5 kg DM/cow) were compared to cows supplemented with concentrate according to their lactation stage as follows: 10.0, 5.0, and 1.5kg DM/cow daily during early, mid, and late lactation, respectively (average daily dose: 5.5 kg DM/cow). There was a supplementationstrategy × lactation stage interaction (P < 0.05) for energy-corrected milk (ECM). For early lactation cows, supplementation at a variablerate increased ECM yield by 14.61% (P < 0.05). There was a supplementation strategy × lactation stage interaction (P < 0.05) for bodyweight change. At late lactation stage, cows supplemented at a fixed rate gained weight (+ 0.16 kg/day), whereas those supplemented ata variable rate lost weight (– 0.08 kg/day; P < 0.05). No significant effect was found for body condition score. The prioritization of milkproduction rather than the attenuation of body reserve mobilization suggests that concentrate allowance based on lactation stage maybe unsuitable for minimizing the negative energy balance in early lactation cows.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CUFFIA, M., BRETSCHNEIDER, G., SALADO, E., CUATRIN, A., ARIAS, D., MATTERA, J., DIEGUEZ, V., PECE, M. (2022). Productive response to two concentrate allocation strategies in dairy cows grazing with restricted pasture allowance. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/614821

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Dairy: World Markets and Trade. Washington, DC, USA: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service; 2016
  2. Kennedy E, O’Donovan M, O´Mara FP, Murphy JP, Delaby L. The effect of early-lactation feeding strategy on the lactation performance of spring-calving dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 3060-3070
  3. Yan T, Mayne CS, Keady TWJ, Agnew RE. Effects of dairy cow genotype with two planes of nutrition on energy partitioning between milk and body tissue. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 1031-1042
  4. Mackey DR, Gordon AW, McCoy MA, Verner M, Mayne CS. Associations between genetic merit for milk production and animal parameters and the fertility performance of dairy cows. Animal 2007; 1: 29-43
  5. André G, Berentsen PBM, Van Duinkerken G, Engel B, Oude Lansink AGJM. Economic potential of individual variation in milk yield response to concentrate intake of dairy cows. J Agr Sci 2010; 148: 263-276
  6. Garcia SC, Pedernera M, Fulkerson WJ, Hordagoda A, Nandra K. Feeding concentrates based on individual cow requirements improves the yield of milk solids in dairy cows grazing restricted pasture. Aust J Exp Agr 2007; 47: 502-508
  7. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Academic Press; 2001
  8. Gallardo MR, Castillo AR, Bargo F, Abdala AA, Maciel MG, Perez-Monti H, Castro HC, Castelli ME. Monensin for lactating dairy cows grazing mixed-alfalfa pasture and supplemented with partial mixed ration. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 644-652
  9. Buskirk DD, Zanella AJ, Harrigan TM, Van Lente JL, Gnagey LM, Kaercher MJ. Large round bale feeder design affect hay utilization and beef cow behavior. J Anim Sci 2003; 81: 109- 115
  10. Devries TJ, Beauchemin KA, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Dietary forage concentration affects the feed sorting behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 5572-5579
  11. Roche JR. Milk production responses to pre-and postcalving dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows. Livest Sci 2007; 110: 12-24
  12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC; 1990
  13. Leonardi C, Armentano LE. Effect of quantity, quality, and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 557-564
  14. Zebeli Q, Mansmann D, Steingass H, Ametaj BN. Balancing diets for physically effective fibre and ruminally degradable starch: a key to lower the risk of sub-acute rumen acidosis and improve productivity of dair