Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6

Study of retail egg supply chain for quality in relation to level of sanitization and farm of origin

Sayfa
800–807
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Processing of table eggs encompassing hygienic handling, cold storage, and treatment of eggs woulddeliver wholesome eggs to the consumers through the retail table egg supply chain.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In the present cross-sectional study, eggs collected from retail outlets were analyzed for physicochemical and microbialquality.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 1120 eggs collected from retail markets were analyzed for physicochemical(weight, shell thickness, shape, yolk index, albumen index, Haugh unit, color, and pH) and microbial (total viable count, and yeast andmold counts) characteristics.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Processing of table eggs encompassing hygienic handling, cold storage, and treatment of eggs woulddeliver wholesome eggs to the consumers through the retail table egg supply chain.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In the present cross-sectional study, eggs collected from retail outlets were analyzed for physicochemical and microbialquality. Comparisons were made between “sanitized” (cleaned, sanitized, and retailed after packaging) and “unsanitized” (not subjectedto cleaning, sanitization, and packaging) retail table eggs that originated from “commercial” and “backyard” (eggs retailed loose withoutany cleaning, sanitization, or packaging) farms. A total of 1120 eggs collected from retail markets were analyzed for physicochemical(weight, shell thickness, shape, yolk index, albumen index, Haugh unit, color, and pH) and microbial (total viable count, and yeast andmold counts) characteristics. Eggs collected from retail markets were found to significantly differ with respect to weight, shell thickness,yolk index, albumen index, Haugh unit, yolk color, and total viable counts (P < 0.01), but not shape index, pH, or yeast and moldcounts. Discriminant analysis corroborated the categorization of table eggs and results of the present study showed differentiation oforigin of table eggs based on physicochemical characteristics whereby processed eggs possessed better microbial quality attributes thanunprocessed and backyard eggs. Processing of table eggs encompassing hygienic handling, cold storage, and treatment of eggs woulddeliver wholesome eggs to the consumers through the retail table egg supply chain.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

FAIROZE, M. N., BENAKABHAT, M. C., BHAVE, K., OMKARAPPA, V. C., KARABASANAVAR, N. (2022). Study of retail egg supply chain for quality in relation to level of sanitization and farm of origin. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6, 800–807. https://ajindex.com/articles/614816

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Koç M, Koç B, Susyal G, Yilmazer MS, Ertekin FK et al. Functional and physicochemical properties of whole egg powder: effect of spray drying conditions. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2011
  2. 48 (2): 141-149. doi: 10.1007/ s13197-010-0159-1 2. Jones DR, Northcutt JK. A survey of common practices in shell egg processing facilities and water use. International Journal of Poultry Science 2005
  3. 4 (10): 734-736. doi: 10.3923/ ijps.2005.734.736 3. Solomon SE. Egg and Eggshell Quality. Aylesbury, UK: Wolfe Publishing Ltd.
  4. Mendes FR, Andrade MA, Café MB, Santos JS, Lacerda MJ et al. Physical and chemical quality of sanitized commercial eggs experimentally contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and refrigerated during storage. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2012
  5. 41 (10): 2211-2218. doi: 10.1590/S1516- 35982012001000011 5. Haugh RR. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. United States Egg and Poultry Magazine 1937
  6. Keener KM, McAvoy KC, Foegeding JB, Curtis PA, Anderson KE et al. Effect of testing temperature on internal egg quality measurements. Poultry Science 2006
  7. 85 (3): 550-555. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.3.550 7. Ratnayake WS, Geera B, Rybak DA. Effects of egg and egg replacers on yellow cake product quality. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2012
  8. 36 (1): 21-29. doi: 10.1111/J.1745-4549.2011.00547.X 8. Yenice G, Kaynar O, Ileriturk M, Hira F, Hayirli A. Quality of eggs in different production systems. Czech Journal of Food Sciences 2016
  9. 34 (4): 370-376. doi: 10.17221/33/2016-CJFS 9. Meng F, Chen D, Li X, Li J, Bao J. Effects of large or small furnished cages on performance, welfare and egg quality of laying hens. Animal Production Science 2015
  10. 55 (6): 793-798. doi: 10.1071/AN13552 10. Campopas. Manual de segurança e qualidade para a avicultura de postura. Brasília, Brazil: Embrapa
  11. 2004 (in Portuguese). 11. Sparks NH, Board RG. Cuticle, shell porosity and water uptake through hens’ eggshells. British Poultry Science 1984
  12. 25 (2): 267-276. doi: 10.1080/00071668408454866 12. Vandyousefi S, Bhargava K. Formulation and application of cinnamon oil–chitosan emulsion coating to increase the internal quality and shelf‐life of shelled eggs. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2017
  13. 41 (2): e12859. doi: 10.1111/ jfpp.12859 13. Board RG, Sparks NHC, Tranter HS. Antimicrobial defense of avian eggs. In: Gould GW (editor). Natural Antimicrobial Systems. Bath, UK: Bath University Press
  14. pp. 82-96. 14. Pascoal LA,