Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey

Sayfa
657–667
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

For a more sustainable market organization and supply chain, business scales need to be increased and raw milk prices should be linked with production costs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to identify the shares of the intermediaries in the Eastern Mediterranean region milk supply chain (I) and to estimate the factors influencing the raw milk marketing preferences of milk producers (II).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research was conducted in 2017 with 102 dairy farms and 36 dairy industry enterprises in Hatay, Kahramanmaraş, and Osmaniye provinces.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:For a more sustainable market organization and supply chain, business scales need to be increased and raw milk prices should be linked with production costs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the shares of the intermediaries in the Eastern Mediterranean region milk supply chain (I) and to estimate the factors influencing the raw milk marketing preferences of milk producers (II). The research was conducted in 2017 with 102 dairy farms and 36 dairy industry enterprises in Hatay, Kahramanmaraş, and Osmaniye provinces. As a result of the research, it was found that 85% of the milk produced by dairy farms was offered to the market, 65% of the milk entering the supply chain was transferred to the dairy industry and the average capacity utilization rate of the industry was 37%. It was found that the most rational chain for the milk producers and dairies among the 4 main marketing channels in the region is the third channel, which has two stages. Binary logistic regression was found to be significant (p < 0.01) as a whole. It was found that “scale” and “price” variables explained the variation in marketing preference by 70%. The cattle unit in the livestock enterprise has a positive effect on the transfer of milk to the industry, and the possibility of selling the milk directly at a higher price has a negative effect. For a more sustainable market organization and supply chain, business scales need to be increased and raw milk prices should be linked with production costs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARIKAN, M. S., CAN, M. F., GÜNLÜ, A., ARAL, Y., ŞAHİN, T. S. (2022). Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 657–667. https://ajindex.com/articles/614616

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Gateway to dairy production and products. Milk production. Technical Report. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2020
  2. Akbay C, Tiryaki Yıldız G. Tüketicilerin ambalajlı ve açık süt tüketim alışkanlıklarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi: Kahramanmaraş örneği. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 2007; 10 (1): 89-96 (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  3. Akın AC. Türkiye’de süt sektörünün değerlendirilmesi: İnek sütü arzında mevsimsellik. Hayvancılık Sektörüne Ekonomik Bakış. 1st ed. Ankara, Turkey: Iksad Publishing House; 2020. pp. 5-28 (in Turkish)
  4. DOĞAKA. TC Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı, Doğu Akdeniz Kalkınma Ajansı, Doğu Akdeniz. Hatay, Turkey: 2020; DOĞAKA (in Turkish)
  5. Cevger Y, Aral Y, Sakarya E. Hayvancılık Ekonomisi. 1st ed. TC. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayın No 2361. Eskişehir, Turkey:Anadolu Üniversitesi; 2011 (in Turkish)
  6. Can MF. Türkiye hayvancılık politikalarının AB ile etkileşimi ve olası sonuçları. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 2018; 13 (2): 242-250 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.17094/ataunivbd.321172 7. Günlü A. Çiğ süt pazarlanmasında süt sanayi işletmelerinde firma yoğunlaşma oranlarının araştırılması: Burdur ili örneği. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 17 (1): 101-106 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi:10.9775/ kvfd.2010.2520 8. Can MF. A socioeconomic analysis of small ruminant breeders’ membership relations and organizational effectiveness. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2014; 61 (2): 119-124. doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002615 9. Can MF, Yalçın C. Investigation of organizational responsibility and satisfaction level of the cattle producers in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2015; 21 (5): 711-717. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2015.13229 10. Collins M. Sampling. Worcester RM, Downham J (editors). Consumer Marketing Research Handbook. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Sci. Pub. Company Inc.; 1986
  7. Armstrong G, Adam S, Denize S, Kotler P. Principles of Marketing. 6th edition. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Pearson Australia; 2015
  8. Vural H, Fidan H. Türkiye’de hayvansal üretim ve hayvancılık işletmelerinin özellikleri. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 2007; 13 (2): 49-59 (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  9. Koç G, Uzmay A. Süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde üreticilerin kooperatif kanalıyla süt pazarlama olasılığını etkileyen faktörler: Trakya Bölgesi örneği. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergi