Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

An assessment of ensiling potential in maize x legume (soybean and cowpea) binary mixtures for yield and feeding quality

Sayfa
547–555
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, intercropping maize with legumes resulted in superior silage quality without a reduction in yield.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, maize and legume intercropping were evaluated in terms of silage yield and quality.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Maize (Zea mays L. “M”) was intercropped with soybean (Glycine max L. “S”) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. “C”) as binary mixtues (maize + legume), and the seed rates were as follows: 100 + 0%, 75 + 25%, 50 + 50% and 25 + 75%.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, intercropping maize with legumes resulted in superior silage quality without a reduction in yield.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, maize and legume intercropping were evaluated in terms of silage yield and quality. Maize (Zea mays L. “M”) was intercropped with soybean (Glycine max L. “S”) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. “C”) as binary mixtues (maize + legume), and the seed rates were as follows: 100 + 0%, 75 + 25%, 50 + 50% and 25 + 75%. The harvested plants were chopped with the particle size of < 2, ensiled in 2 kg plastic jars and left fermentation at 25 ± 2 °C for 45 days. In this study, silage yield, dry matter ratio, pH value, crude protein ratio, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, digestibility of dry matter, dry matter intake, total digestibil nutrient relative feed values, lactic acid, acetic acid, butyric acid, malic acid, citric acid, succinic acid, oxalic acid, potassium, phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium contents were determined. All the M + S mixtures showed high performance in terms of Flieg score and lactic acid content. The highest relative feed quality value was determined in the sole cowpea (156.4) and 25M + 75S% (148.5) mixture. As a result, intercropping maize with legumes resulted in superior silage quality without a reduction in yield.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOĞRUSÖZ, M. Ç., BAŞARAN, U., GÜLÜMSER, E., MUT, H. (2022). An assessment of ensiling potential in maize x legume (soybean and cowpea) binary mixtures for yield and feeding quality. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 547–555. https://ajindex.com/articles/614598

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Harmansah F. Forage quality, problems and suggestions in the Turkey. Journal Turkey Seed Growers Association 2018; 25: 9-13
  2. Allen MS, Coors JG, Roth GW. Corn silage. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (editors). Silage Science and Technology. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science, Society of America; 2003. pp. 547-608
  3. Sah RP, Ahmed S, Malaviya DR, Saxena P. Identification of consistence performing dual purpose maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under semi-arid condition. Range Management & Agroforestry 2016; 37: 162-166
  4. Turgut I. Cultivation of corn silage. In: E. Açıkgöz, I. Turgut and I. Filya (editors). Growing Silage Crops. İstanbul, Turkey: Hasad Pressing; 2002. pp. 11-33
  5. Sade B, Soylu S. Corn farming in the World and Turkey. National Cereal Symposium; Konya, Turkey; 2008. pp. 101- 108
  6. McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhald JFD. Animal Nutrition. 4th Edition Longman Group, UK Ltd. 1987. pp. 1-7
  7. Church DC. Livestock Feeds and Feeding. 3rd Edition. Prentice-Hall. Incl. New Jersey, USA 1991. pp. 80-94
  8. Topps JH, Oliver J. Animal foods of Central Africa. Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal Technical Handbook 1993; 2: 135
  9. Titterton M. The feasibility of using forage sorghum in drought years for silage in Zimbabwe. In: Kirk R (Ed). Proceedings of the Annual General Meeting on Forage production for dairying in Zimbabwe, Grasslands Society of Zimbabwe. August, 1997
  10. Kowalczyk E, Patyra E, Kwiatek K. Organic acids and their importance in animal husbandry. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 2013; 69 (5): 269-273
  11. Kilic A. Silo feed (Instruction, Education and Application Proposals). Bilgehan Press, Izmir, 1986
  12. Uden P. Plant organic acids in fresh and ensiled forage plants. Grass Forage Science 2018; 73: 583-587. doi:10.1111/gfs.12361
  13. Başaran U, Gülümser E, Mut H, Çopur Doğrusöz M. Determination of silage yield and quality of grasspea + cereal intercrops. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 2018; 6 (9): 1237-1242. doi: 10.24925/turjaf. v6i9.1237-1242.2022 14. Van Soest PJ. The use of detergents in the analysis of fibre feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1963; 46: 829-835
  14. Van Soest PJ, Wine RH. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1967; 50: 50-55