Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Determination of slaughter and carcass traits in male Turkish Anatolian buffaloes at different slaughter weights

Sayfa
168–175
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Except for chunk, short loin, sirloin, rump, and flank ratios, the differences in all of the other carcass section ratios of the SW groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Key words: Anatolian buffalo, slaughter weight, carcass traits, carcass measurement

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abstract: Nowadays, deficits in red meat resources in Turkey are caused by the import of red meat from different countries.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Twenty weaned male Anatolian buffalo calves of about 5 months old, at an average live weight of 100 kg, were used as the animal specimen in the present study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Except for chunk, short loin, sirloin, rump, and flank ratios, the differences in all of the other carcass section ratios of the SW groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Key words: Anatolian buffalo, slaughter weight, carcass traits, carcass measurement
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Abstract: Nowadays, deficits in red meat resources in Turkey are caused by the import of red meat from different countries. Anatolian buffaloes used in this research are a species that can contribute to red meat production in Turkey. This study was performed to determine the slaughter and carcass traits of Anatolian buffaloes at different slaughter weights. Twenty weaned male Anatolian buffalo calves of about 5 months old, at an average live weight of 100 kg, were used as the animal specimen in the present study. The calves were fed with 30:70 roughage (alfalfa hay = 18.07% crude protein, 2186.90 kcal kg–1 metabolic energy DM): concentrate feed (cattle fattening feed = 16.40% crude protein, 2696.94 kcal kg–1 metabolic energy DM). The calves were randomly distributed into 4 different slaughter weight (SW) groups of GI (200 kg; n = 5), GII (250 kg; n = 5), GIII (300 kg; n = 5), and GIV (350 kg; n = 5). The results showed that hot and cold carcass ratios (P < 0.01) and carcass chilling loss increased with increasing slaughter weights. Except for head, feet, and kidney weight, the differences in all of the other organ weights of the SW groups were not statistically significant. The differences in all of the investigated carcass measurements of the SW groups were detected to be significant (P < 0.05). Although total carcass conformation index values increased with increasing slaughter weights, only the differences in the carcass compactness values of the SW groups were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Except for chunk, short loin, sirloin, rump, and flank ratios, the differences in all of the other carcass section ratios of the SW groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Key words: Anatolian buffalo, slaughter weight, carcass traits, carcass measurement

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UĞURLUTEPE, E., ŞAHİN, A., AKSOY, Y., ULUTAŞ, Z. (2022). Determination of slaughter and carcass traits in male Turkish Anatolian buffaloes at different slaughter weights. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 168–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/614597

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Dinler Z. Mikro Ekonomi. Bursa, Turkey; Ekin Kitabevi; 2009 (in Turkish)
  2. Aygün T, Karakuş F, Yılmaz A, Gökdal Ö, Ülker H. Van ili merkez ilçede kırmızı et tüketim alışkanlığı. In: 4. Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi; Isparta, Türkiye; 2004. pp. 361-364 (in Turkish)
  3. Tufarelli V, Khan RU, Laudadio V. Feeding of wheat middlings in lamb total mixed rations: effects on growth performance and carcass traits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2011; 170 (1-2): 130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.08.001 4. Soysal Mİ. Manda ve Ürünleri Üretimi. Tekirdağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Zootekni Bölümü, Ders Notları. Tekirdağ, Turkey: Tekirdağ University; 2009 (in Turkish)
  4. General Directory of Meat and Milk Board. Sector Evaluation Report in 2019. Ankara, Turkey: General Directory of Meat and Milk Board; 2019a. p. 45
  5. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agricultere and Forestry. Predictions and Status of Red Meat in 2018. Tepge Yayın No: 302. Ankara, Turkey: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agricultere and Forestry; 2018
  6. General Directory of Meat and Milk Board. Sector Evaluation Report in 2019. Ankara, Turkey: General Directory of Meat and Milk Board; 2019b. p. 23
  7. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. Nutrient Requirement of Beef Cattle. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1996
  8. Turkish Standards Institute (TSI). TS 52737 Butchery AnimalsRules for Slaughtering and Carcass Preparation. Ankara, Turkey: TSI; 1987
  9. Boer HD, Dumont BL, Pomeroy RW, Weniger JH. Manual on EAAP reference methods for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle. Livestock Production Science 1974; 1 (2): 151-164
  10. Slimene A, Damergi C, Chammakhi L, Najar T, Jbeli M et al. Carcass characterization of bulls slaughtred between 14 and 26 months using the principal component analysis. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2012; 11 (16): 2995-2999. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.2995.2999 12. Ripoll G, Albertí P, Álvarez-Rodríguez J, Blasco I, Sanz A. Body size, carcass and meat quality of three commercial beef categories of ‘Serrana de teruel’ breed. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2016; 14 (3): 1-13. doi: 10.5424/ sjar/2016143-9122 13. Pena F, Cano T, Domenech V, Alcalde MJ, Martos J et al. Influence of sex, slaughter weight and carcass weight on “non-carcass” and carcass quality in segure˜na lambs. Small Ruminant Research 2005; 60 (3): 247-254. doi: 10.1016/j. smallrumres.2004.12.011 14. Vacca GM, Carcangiu V