Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

The conservation method effects of the Barley-Vetch mixture planted together on the performance of pregnant ewes

Sayfa
218–225
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, barley-vetch mixture can be used as hay and silage in pregnant sheep feeding, being hay superior to silage.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to examine the effects of barley-vetch hay and barley-vetch silage on liveweight change in pregnant sheep and birthweight in lambs and to determine the optimal form of barley-vetch roughage usage in sheep feeding.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Forty-eight (Kıvırcık x Akkaraman (G1 ) sheep were blocked according to age and randomly distributed to three groups: barley-vetch hay (H, n = 16), barleyvetch silage (S, n = 16), and the control group (C, n = 16).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, barley-vetch mixture can be used as hay and silage in pregnant sheep feeding, being hay superior to silage.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of barley-vetch hay and barley-vetch silage on liveweight change in pregnant sheep and birthweight in lambs and to determine the optimal form of barley-vetch roughage usage in sheep feeding. Forty-eight (Kıvırcık x Akkaraman (G1 ) sheep were blocked according to age and randomly distributed to three groups: barley-vetch hay (H, n = 16), barleyvetch silage (S, n = 16), and the control group (C, n = 16). The H group was fed barley-vetch hay ad libitum and limited concentrate, the S group was fed barley-vetch silage ad libitum and limited concentrate, and the C group was fed barleygrass straw + alfalfa hay (50/50%) and limited concentrate feed. The trial was started in the final trimester period of the pregnancy and lasted 90 days. Liveweight and feed intake of the pregnant sheep were recorded in the last period of pregnancy. The liveweight of the lambs were measured at lambing and then on d 15 and 30. There is no diet effect on liveweights measure 1 and 2 months after lambing (p > 0.05). The liveweight value of sheep at lambing was 67.01 ± 1.32, 64.07 ± 1.54, and 64.89 ± 1.48 kg for the groups H, S, and C, respectively. The birth type was significant on birth weight (p < 0.05). Lamb liveweights on d 15 and 30 for the group H was greater than those for the group S (p < 0.05). Lambs’ birth weight and weights on d 15 and 30 were 4.94 ± 0.13, 4.44 ± 0.15, and 4.77 ± 0.17 kg; 9.30 ± 030, 8.03 ± 0.30, and 8.94 ± 0.34, 13.36 ± 0.43, 10.85 ± 0.56, and 12.37 ± 041 for groups respectively. In conclusion, barley-vetch mixture can be used as hay and silage in pregnant sheep feeding, being hay superior to silage.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞENYÜZ, H. H., TUNÇ, A. E., ÜNAY, E., ERİŞEK, A., YILDIRIM, Ç., ERDAL, N., COŞKUN, M. İ., MARAŞ, H. (2022). The conservation method effects of the Barley-Vetch mixture planted together on the performance of pregnant ewes. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 218–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/614522

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Kennedy PC, Dawson LER, Lively FO, Steen RWJ, Fearon AM, et al. Effects of offering lupins/triticale and vetch/barley silages alone or in combination with grass silage on animal performance, meat quality and the fatty acid composition of lean meat from beef cattle. The Journal of Agricultural Science 2018; 156 (8): 1005-1016
  2. Şenyüz HH, Erat S, Karslı MA, Soydemir İ. Comparison of fattening performance of Angus, Charolais, Limousine and Simmental cattle imported to Turkey. Livestock Studies 2020; 60 (1): 1-4. doi: 10.46897/lahaed.779712 3. Makkar HPS, Tran G, Heuz´e V, Giger-Reverdin S, Lessire M, et al. Seaweeds for livestock diets: a review, Animal Feed Science and Technology 2015; 212: 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2015.09.018 4. FAO. (2019). FAO Statistics
  3. Bingöl NT, Karsli MA, Yilmaz IH, Bolat D. The effects of planting time and combination on the nutrient composition and digestible dry matter yield of four mixtures of vetch varieties intercropped with barley. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2007; 31 (5): 297-302
  4. Balabanlı C, Albayrak S, Türk M, Yuksel O. A research on determination of hay yields and silage qualities of some vetch+ cereal mixtures. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 2010; 15(2): 204-209
  5. Karslı MA, Bingol NT. The determination of planting density on herbage yield and silage quality of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) green mass. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2009; 15 (4): 581-586
  6. Civaner AG. Batı Akdeniz bölgesinde yetiştirilen bazı yem hammaddelerinin besin madde içeriklerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. PhD, Akdeniz Univercity, Antalya, Turkey, 2015
  7. Aygün T, Çelikyürek H. Recommended sheep husbandry model and body weights of Morkaraman lambs in Muş province. Livestock Studies 2020; 60 (1): 005-008. doi: 10.46897/lahaed.661067 10. Güngör İ, Atasoy F. Use of multiple regression modeling for the evaluation of lactation characteristics of Awassi sheep. Livestock Studies 2020; 60(2): 46-53. doi: 10.46897/ livestockstudies.846408 11. Umberger SH. Feeding sheep. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Publication 2009; 410-853
  8. Ergün A, Çolpan İ, Yıldız G, Küçükersan S, Tuncer ŞD et al. Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastalıkları., Geliştirilmiş 5. Baskı., 975-97808-2-8, Ankara, Turkey. Pozitif Yayımcılık; 2011
  9. Bingöl NT, Bolat D, Karslı MA, Akça İ. Arpa hasılı ve korunga karışımı silaja farklı düzeylerde melas ilavesinin silaj kalitesi ve sindirilebilirliği üzer