KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Cross section predictions of the Z boson in association with jets at 14 TeV center-of-mass energy in proton–proton collisions

Kamuran DİLSİZ
Emrah TIRAŞ
Sayfa
495–500
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The comparison of NLO predictions at 13 and 14 TeV center-of-mass energiesshows that the Large Hadron Collider will provide approximately 9% more yield at 14 TeV center-of-mass energy thanthe yield at 13 TeV center-of-mass energy for the Z boson in association with 1 and 2 jets.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:: QCD predictions of the Z (Z→ l+l−) boson in association with jets (up to 2 jets) in proton–proton collisionsare presented in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results are predicted at LO and NLO accuracy using two most recent parton distributionfunctions, CT14 and MMHT2014.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The comparison of NLO predictions at 13 and 14 TeV center-of-mass energiesshows that the Large Hadron Collider will provide approximately 9% more yield at 14 TeV center-of-mass energy thanthe yield at 13 TeV center-of-mass energy for the Z boson in association with 1 and 2 jets.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

: QCD predictions of the Z (Z→ l+l−) boson in association with jets (up to 2 jets) in proton–proton collisionsare presented in this study. The results are predicted at LO and NLO accuracy using two most recent parton distributionfunctions, CT14 and MMHT2014. LO and NLO corrections are obtained with LO, NLO, and NNLO PDFs to find outthe best PDF, which provides well compatible predictions with the experimental measurements. QCD predictions areperformed at 13 and 14 TeV center-of-mass energies. To verify the obtained results, the predictions are compared with themeasured results by ATLAS collaboration. NLO QCD predictions obtained by using NLO and NNLO PDFs show goodagreement with the experimental data. The comparison of NLO predictions at 13 and 14 TeV center-of-mass energiesshows that the Large Hadron Collider will provide approximately 9% more yield at 14 TeV center-of-mass energy thanthe yield at 13 TeV center-of-mass energy for the Z boson in association with 1 and 2 jets.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİLSİZ, K., TIRAŞ, E. (2022). Cross section predictions of the Z boson in association with jets at 14 TeV center-of-mass energy in proton–proton collisions. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 495–500. https://ajindex.com/articles/614005

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Apollinari, G.; Alonso, I.; Bürining, O.; Lamont, M.; Rossi, L. High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC). Preliminary Design Report.CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015
  2. Boughezal, R.; Liu, X.; Petriello, F. Phys. Rev D. 2016, 94, 074015-9
  3. Aaltonen, T.; Amerio, S.; Amidei, D.; Anastassov, A.; Annovi, A.; Antos, J.; Apollinari, G.; Appel, J. A.; Arisawa, T.; Artikov, A.; et al. Phys. Rev D. 2015, 91, 012002-24
  4. Abazov, V. M.; Abbott, B.; Abolins, M.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, M.; Adams, T.; Aguilo, E.; Ahsan, M.; Alexeev, G. D.; Alkhazov, G.; et al. Phys. Lett. B. 2010, 682, 370-380
  5. Chatrchyan, S.; Hmayakyan, G.; Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A. M.; Adam, W.; Bauer, T.; Bergauer, T.; Bergauer, H.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; et al. J. Instrum. 2008, 3, S08004-334
  6. Aad, G.; Abajyan, T.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Khalek, S. A.; Abdelalim, A. A.; Abdinov, O.; Aben, R.; Abi, B.; Abolins, M.; et al. J. High Energy Phys. 2013, 07, 1-50
  7. Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A. M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; Fabjan, C.; Friedl, M.; Frühwirth, R.; et al. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 052008-26
  8. Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Asilar, E.; Bergauer, T.; Brandstetter, J.; Brondolin, E.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J. et al. J. High Energy Phys. 2016, 10, 1-45
  9. Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Asilar, E.; Bergauer, T.; Brandstetter, J.; Brondolin, E.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; et al. J. High Energy Phys. 2017, 04, 1-69
  10. Aaboud, M.; Aad, G.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Abdinov, O.; Abeloos, B.; Aben, R.; AbouZeid, O. S.; Abraham, N. L.; Abramowicz, H.; et al. Eur. Phys. J. C 2017, 77, 1-31
  11. Campbell, J. M.; Ellis, R. K. In Nuclear Physics B Conference Proceedings: FERMILAB-CONF-10-244-T, Batavia, IL, USA, July 2010. pp. 10-15
  12. Ogul, H.; Dilsiz, K. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 2017, 8262018-8
  13. Aaltonen, T.; Amerio, S; Amidei, D. E; Anastassov, A. I; Annovi, A; Antos, J.; Apollinari, G.; Appel, J. A.; Arisawa, T.; Artikov, A.; et al. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 012002-27
  14. Salam, G. P. Eur. Phys. J. C 2010, 67, 637-686
  15. Pancheri, G.; Srivasta, Y.N. Eur. Phys. J C. 2017, 77,150-178.