KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of hearing ability with pure-tone audiometry and otoacoustic emission methods in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

Mustafa SÜREN
Levent GÜRBÜZLER
Serkan KARAMAN
Ziya KAYA
Semih ARICI
Sayfa
22–26
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: According to our study, spinal anesthesia performed with a 27-gauge Quincke needle does not cause transient or permanent hearing loss.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To investigate the frequency of hearing loss after spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia using pure-tone audiometry and otoacoustic emission methods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: A total of 80 patients (40 females, 40 males, aged 18-65 years) were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: According to our study, spinal anesthesia performed with a 27-gauge Quincke needle does not cause transient or permanent hearing loss.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Hearing · spinal anesthesia · spinal needle

Özet

To investigate the frequency of hearing loss after spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia using pure-tone audiometry and otoacoustic emission methods. Materials and methods: A total of 80 patients (40 females, 40 males, aged 18-65 years) were included in the study. For spinal anesthesia, a 27-gauge Quincke spinal needle was entered at the first attempt into the subarachnoidal space through the L4-L5 interval with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The first day before spinal anesthesia, pure-tone audiometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and tympanometry were performed on all patients, and the same procedures were repeated on the postoperative second day. Results: No problem was encountered related to surgery and anesthesia in any of the patients. Comparative pre- and postoperative results of pure-tone audiometry performed on the right and left ears were not significantly different in any of the patients (P > 0.05). Additionally, the outcomes of pre- and postoperatively performed transient evoked otoacoustic emission and of distortion product otoacoustic emission of both ears were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Conclusion: According to our study, spinal anesthesia performed with a 27-gauge Quincke needle does not cause transient or permanent hearing loss.

Abstract

To investigate the frequency of hearing loss after spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia using pure-tone audiometry and otoacoustic emission methods. Materials and methods: A total of 80 patients (40 females, 40 males, aged 18-65 years) were included in the study. For spinal anesthesia, a 27-gauge Quincke spinal needle was entered at the first attempt into the subarachnoidal space through the L4-L5 interval with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The first day before spinal anesthesia, pure-tone audiometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and tympanometry were performed on all patients, and the same procedures were repeated on the postoperative second day. Results: No problem was encountered related to surgery and anesthesia in any of the patients. Comparative pre- and postoperative results of pure-tone audiometry performed on the right and left ears were not significantly different in any of the patients (P > 0.05). Additionally, the outcomes of pre- and postoperatively performed transient evoked otoacoustic emission and of distortion product otoacoustic emission of both ears were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Conclusion: According to our study, spinal anesthesia performed with a 27-gauge Quincke needle does not cause transient or permanent hearing loss.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SÜREN, M., GÜRBÜZLER, L., KARAMAN, S., KAYA, Z., ARICI, S. (2022). Assessment of hearing ability with pure-tone audiometry and otoacoustic emission methods in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 22–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/611078

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Camgöz EN, Günaydın B. A comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine and bupivacaine during cesarean section. Turk J Med Sci 2011; 41: 219–26.
  2. Erol A, Topal A, Arbag H, Kilicaslan A, Reisli R, Otelcioglu S. Auditory function after spinal anaesthesia: the effect of differently designed spinal needles. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 416–20.
  3. Yurtlu BS, Hancı V, Okyay RD, Bostankolu SE, Erdoğan Kayhan G, Hakimoğlu S et al. Effects on hypotension incidence: hyperbaric, isobaric, and combinations of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 307–13.
  4. Günaydın B, Güngör İ, İzdeş S. Final baricity of ropivacaine or bupivacaine combined with fentanyl for intrathecal administration. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 942–5.
  5. Cosar A, Yetiser S, Sizlan A, Yanarates O, Yildirim A. Hearing impairment associated with spinal anesthesia. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 1159–64.
  6. Kiliçkan L, Gürkan Y, Aydin O, Etiler N. The effect of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia and size of spinal needle on postoperative hearing loss after elective caesarean section. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003; 28: 267–72.
  7. Malhotra SK, Iyer BA, Gupta AK, Raghunathan M, Nakra D. Spinal analgesia and auditory functions: a comparison of two sizes of Quincke needle. Minerva Anestesiol 2007; 73: 395–99.
  8. Kiliçkan L, Gürkan Y, Ozkarakas H. Permanent sensorineural hearing loss following spinal anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46: 1155–7.
  9. Güçlü E, Demiraran Y, Sezen G. Hearing loss after spinal anaesthesia: comparison of 22 and 25 G Quincke needles in a non-elderly population. Clin Otolaryngol 2006; 31: 339–52.
  10. Ok G, Tok D, Erbuyun K, Aslan A, Tekin I. Hearing loss does not occur in young patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004; 29: 430–33.
  11. Gültekin S, Ozcan S. Does hearing loss after spinal anesthesia differ between young and elderly patients? Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1318–20. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–91.
  12. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Harris FP, Stagner BB, Hawkins MD, Martin GK. Distortion product emissions in humans I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1990; 147: 3–14. Walsted A. Effects of cerebrospinal fluid loss on the auditory system. Clinical and experimental investigations. Dan Med Bull. 1998; 45: 268–81.
  13. Walsted A, Salomon G, Olsen KS. Low-frequency hearing loss after spinal anesthesia. Perilymphatic hypotonia? Scand A