Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Effectiveness of HP-hMG versus r-FSH in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with moderate male-factor infertility

Sayfa
144–149
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: HP-hMG is as effective as r-FSH in terms of oocyte and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ICSI with moderate male-factor infertility.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) versus recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (r-FSH) treatments following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist suppression in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with moderate male-factor infertility in terms of oocyte and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: A total of 240 infertile women were treated with HP-hMG (HP-hMG group, n = 120 patients) or r-FSH (r-FSH group, n = 120 patients) following GnRH agonist suppression (long regimen).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: HP-hMG is as effective as r-FSH in terms of oocyte and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ICSI with moderate male-factor infertility.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Male-factor infertility · ICSI · highly purified hMG

Özet

The aim of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) versus recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (r-FSH) treatments following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist suppression in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with moderate male-factor infertility in terms of oocyte and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes. Materials and methods: A total of 240 infertile women were treated with HP-hMG (HP-hMG group, n = 120 patients) or r-FSH (r-FSH group, n = 120 patients) following GnRH agonist suppression (long regimen). Inclusion criteria for the study groups were infertility due to moderate oligoasthenoteratospermia with no associated female infertility factor, fewer than 2 previous assisted reproductive technology cycles, and female patients with ages between 19 and 35 years, normal basal FSH, regular ovulatory cycles, and body mass index below 30 kg/m2. Results: Treatment durations and gonadotropin doses were similar in both groups. Cycle cancellation rates, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, total and metaphase II oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and number of embryos transferred were all similar in both groups. The clinical pregnancy rates were 45.9% (n = 50/109) in the r-FSH group and 40.4% (n = 44/109) in the HP-hMG group. Conclusion: HP-hMG is as effective as r-FSH in terms of oocyte and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ICSI with moderate male-factor infertility.

Abstract

The aim of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) versus recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (r-FSH) treatments following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist suppression in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with moderate male-factor infertility in terms of oocyte and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes. Materials and methods: A total of 240 infertile women were treated with HP-hMG (HP-hMG group, n = 120 patients) or r-FSH (r-FSH group, n = 120 patients) following GnRH agonist suppression (long regimen). Inclusion criteria for the study groups were infertility due to moderate oligoasthenoteratospermia with no associated female infertility factor, fewer than 2 previous assisted reproductive technology cycles, and female patients with ages between 19 and 35 years, normal basal FSH, regular ovulatory cycles, and body mass index below 30 kg/m2. Results: Treatment durations and gonadotropin doses were similar in both groups. Cycle cancellation rates, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, total and metaphase II oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and number of embryos transferred were all similar in both groups. The clinical pregnancy rates were 45.9% (n = 50/109) in the r-FSH group and 40.4% (n = 44/109) in the HP-hMG group. Conclusion: HP-hMG is as effective as r-FSH in terms of oocyte and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ICSI with moderate male-factor infertility.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KASAP, B., AYRIM, A., TURHAN, N., PEKEL, A., BAYRAK, Ö. (2022). Effectiveness of HP-hMG versus r-FSH in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with moderate male-factor infertility. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 144–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/611059

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Siristatidis C, Trivella M, Chrelias C, Sioulas VD, Vrachnis N, Kassanos D. A short narrative review of the feasibility of adopting mild ovarian stimulation for IVF as the current standard of care. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 505–10.
  2. Pouwer AW, Farquhar C, Kremer JA. Long-acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6: CD009577. Reindollar RH, Goldman MB. Gonadotropin therapy: a 20th century relic. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 813–8.
  3. Beall SA, DeCherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 795–801.
  4. Loumaye E, Engrand P, Shoham Z, Hillier SG, Baird DT. Clinical evidence of an LH ‘ceiling’ effect induced by administration of recombinant human LH during the late follicular phase of stimulation cycles in World Health Organization type I and type II anovulation. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 314–22.
  5. Bjercke S, Tanbo T, Abyholm T, Omland A, Opİien HK, Fedorcsak P. Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing their first treatment cycle of IVF or ICSI. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 1053–60.
  6. Pacchiarotti A, Sbracia M, Frega A, Selman H, Rinaldi L, Pacchiarotti A. Urinary hMG (Meropur) versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH (Pergoveris) in IVF: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2467–9.
  7. Ye H, Huang G, Pei L, Zeng P, Luo X. Outcome of in vitro fertilization following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in downregulated women of advanced reproductive age: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012; 28: 540–44.
  8. Kilani Z, Dakkak A, Ghunaim S, Cognigni GE, Tabarelli C, Parmegiani L et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing HP-hMG with r- FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1194–9. European and Israeli Study Group on Highly Purified Menotropin versus r-FSH. Efficacy and safety of highly purified menotropin versus r-FSH in IVF, ICSI cycles: a randomized, comparative trial. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 520–8.
  9. Anderson AN, Devroey P, Arce JC. Clinical outcome following stimulation with HP-hMG or r-FSH in patient undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor blind controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 3217–27.
  10. Ziebe S, Lundin K, Janssens R, Helmgaard L, Arce JC. Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH o