Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of new multiplex PCR primers for the identification of Plasmodium species found in Sabah, Malaysia

Sayfa
207–218
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Multiplex PCR could be used as alternative molecular diagnosis for the identification of all Plasmodium species as it requires a shorter time to screen a large number of samples.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: Malaria is a major public health problem, especially in the Southeast Asia region, caused by 5 species of Plasmodium (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale, and P. knowlesi).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Of the 129 samples identified as malaria-positive by microscopy, 15 samples were positive for P. falciparum, 14 for P. vivax, 6 for P. knowlesi, 72 for P. malariae, and 2 for mixed infection of P. falciparum/P. malariae.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Multiplex PCR could be used as alternative molecular diagnosis for the identification of all Plasmodium species as it requires a shorter time to screen a large number of samples.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:129 samples
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: Malaria is a major public health problem, especially in the Southeast Asia region, caused by 5 species of Plasmodium (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale, and P. knowlesi). The aim of this study was to compare parasite species identification methods using the new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) against nested PCR and microscopy. Materials and methods: Blood samples on filter papers were subject to conventional PCR methods using primers designed by us in multiplex PCR and previously designed primers of nested PCR. Both sets of results were compared with microscopic identification. Results: Of the 129 samples identified as malaria-positive by microscopy, 15 samples were positive for P. falciparum, 14 for P. vivax, 6 for P. knowlesi, 72 for P. malariae, and 2 for mixed infection of P. falciparum/P. malariae. Both multiplex and nested PCR identified 12 P. falciparum single infections. For P. vivax, 9 were identified by multiplex and 12 by nested PCR. For 72 P. malariae cases, multiplex PCR identified 58 as P. knowlesi and 10 as P. malariae compared to nested PCR, which identified 59 as P. knowlesi and 7 as P. malariae. Conclusion: Multiplex PCR could be used as alternative molecular diagnosis for the identification of all Plasmodium species as it requires a shorter time to screen a large number of samples.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

STANIS, C. S., SONG, B. K., CHUA, T. H., LAU, Y. L., JELIP, J. (2022). Evaluation of new multiplex PCR primers for the identification of Plasmodium species found in Sabah, Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 207–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/610886

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2013. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013
  2. Cox-Singh J, Davis TM, Lee KS, Shamsul SS, Matusop A, Ratnam S, Hasan AR, David JC, Singh B. Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in humans is widely distributed and potentially life threatening. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 15: 165–171
  3. Jongwutiwes S, Putaporntip C, Iwasaki T, Sata T, Kanbara H. Naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in human, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10: 2211–2213
  4. Tang TT, Salas A, Ali-Tammam M, Martinez MC, Lanza M, Arroyo E, Rubio JM. First case of detection of Plasmodium knowlesi in Spain by real-time PCR in a traveller from Southeast Asia. Malaria J 2010; 9: 219
  5. Van den Eede P, Van HN, Van OC, Vythilingam I, Duc TN, Hungle X, Manh HN, Anne J, D’Allesandro, Erhart A. Human Plasmodium knowlesi infections in young children in central Vietnam. Malaria J 2009; 30: 249
  6. Cox FEG. History of the discovery of the malaria parasites and their vectors. Parasite Vector 2010; 3: 5
  7. Nateghpour M, Khojasteh HA, Keshavarz H, Hajjaran H, Edrissian G, Rahimi A, Gobakhloo N. Comparison of microscopical examination and semi-nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction in diagnosis of P. falciparum and P. vivax. East Mediterr Health J 2009; 17: 51–55
  8. Wongsrichanalai C, Barcus MJ, Muth S, Sutamihardja A, Wernsdorfer WH. A review of malaria diagnostic tools. Microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007; 77: 119–127
  9. Moody A. Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15: 66–78
  10. Barber BE, William T, Grigg MJ, Menon J, Auburn S, Marfurt J, Anstey NM, Yeo TW. A prospective comparative study of knowlesi, falciparum, and vivax malaria in Sabah, Malaysia: high proportion with severe disease from Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax but no mortality with early referral and artesunate therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56: 383–397
  11. Johnston SP, Pieniazek NJ, Xayavong MV, Slemenda SV, Wilkins PP, Silva AJ. PCR as a confirmatory technique for laboratory diagnosis of malaria. Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 1087–1089
  12. Berry A, Fabre R, Benoit-Vical F, Cassaing S, Magnaval JF. Contribution of PCR-based methods to diagnosis and management of imported malaria. Med Trop 2005; 65: 176– 183
  13. Lucchi NW, Poorak M, Oberstaller J, DeBarry J, Srinivasamoorthy G, Goldman I, Xayavong M, da Silva AJ, Peterson DS, Barnwell JW et al. A new single-step PCR assay for the detection of the zoonotic malaria parasite P