Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

The role of FDG PET/CT in detection of distant metastasis in theinitial staging of breast cancer

Sayfa
349–360
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT led to a change in the stage of disease and the treatment approach in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients due to its superiority in detecting extraaxillary regional lymph node metastases and distant metastases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: We aimed to evaluate the role of FDG PET/CT in the detection of extraaxillary regional nodal/distant metastasis in breast cancer patients and to assess the value of FDG PET/CT for detecting distant metastases in patient subgroups.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: A total of 254 patients with breast cancer (248 female, 6 male) who underwent PET/CT for initial staging were enrolled.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT led to a change in the stage of disease and the treatment approach in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients due to its superiority in detecting extraaxillary regional lymph node metastases and distant metastases.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: We aimed to evaluate the role of FDG PET/CT in the detection of extraaxillary regional nodal/distant metastasis in breast cancer patients and to assess the value of FDG PET/CT for detecting distant metastases in patient subgroups. Materials and methods: A total of 254 patients with breast cancer (248 female, 6 male) who underwent PET/CT for initial staging were enrolled. Patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 consisted of 154 patients diagnosed by tru-cut/core/FNAB, Group 2 comprised 32 patients diagnosed by excisional biopsy, Group 3 included 62 patients who had mastectomy-axillary lymph node dissection, and Group 4 consisted of 6 patients who had axillary lymph node metastasis diagnosed by excisional biopsy. Results: PET/CT detected distant metastasis in 76 of the 254 patients. Of these patients, 21.7% had bone/bone marrow metastasis, 7.1% had lung metastasis, 13% had mediastinal lymph node metastasis, 4.8% had liver metastasis, 9.8% had other organ/system metastasis, and 6% had other lymphadenopathies. According to T staging, the percentages of distant metastasis were as follows: 13.6% of the 66 T1 stage patients, 35.7% of the 129 T2 stage patients, 40% of the 20 T3 stage patients, and 33.3% of the 39 T4 stage patients. Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT led to a change in the stage of disease and the treatment approach in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients due to its superiority in detecting extraaxillary regional lymph node metastases and distant metastases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAĞER, M. S., SÖNMEZOĞLU, K., HALA, M., KOCAEL, P. Ç., ÖZHAN, M., EKMEKÇİOĞLU, Ö., AKSOY, S. Y., ALIYEV, A., VATANKULU, B., ERKAN, M. E. (2022). The role of FDG PET/CT in detection of distant metastasis in theinitial staging of breast cancer. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 349–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/610771

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 212– 236
  2. Ries LAG, Harkins D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg L, Eisner MP, Horner MJ, Howlader N et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2003 (based on November 2005 SEER data submission). Bethesda, MD, USA: National Cancer Institute; 2006
  3. Fisher B. Malignancies of the breast. In: Cameron RB, editors. Practical Oncology. Norwalk, CT, USA: Appleton & Lange; 1994. pp. 417–434
  4. Hossfeld DK, Sherman CD, Love RR, Bosch FX. Manual of Clinical Oncology. 5th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: UICC; 1990. pp. 236–248
  5. Hance KW, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, Young HA, Levine PH. Trends in inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program at the National Cancer Institute. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 966–975
  6. Carlson RW, McCormick B. Update: NCCN breast cancer clinical practice guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2005; 3: S7–S11
  7. Bomanji JB, Costa DC, Ell PJ. Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2001; 2: 157–164
  8. Hustinx R, Benard F, Alavi A. Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2002; 32: 35–46
  9. Avril N, Rosé CA, Schelling M, Dose J, Kuhn W, Bense S, Weber W, Ziegler S, Graeff H, Schwaiger M. Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3495–3502
  10. Quon A, Gambhir SS. FDG-PET and beyond: molecular breast cancer imaging. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1664–1673
  11. Mahner S, Schirrmacher S, Brenner W, Jenicke L, Habermann CR, Avril N, Dose-Schwarz J. Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-Dglucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1249–1254
  12. Groheux D, Moretti JL, Baillet G, Espie M, Giacchetti S, Hindie E, Hennequin C, Vilcoq JR, Cuvier C, Toubert ME et al. Effect of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with clinical Stage II and III breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: 695–704
  13. Niikura N, Costelloe CM, Madewell JE, Hayashi N, Yu TK, Liu J, Palla SL, Tokuda Y, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN et al. FDGPET/CT compared with conventional imaging in the detection of distant metastases of primary breast cancer. Oncol