KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

The Turkish version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): its cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability

Muhammed KILINÇ
Ender AYVAT
Nuray KIRDI
Sayfa
908–915
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that the Turkish version of the PASE has powerful measurement qualities, which makes it a reliable and valid scale for the fields of research and practice

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: This study aimed to describe the cultural adaptation of the Turkish Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and to examine the reliability and validity of the scale in older Turkish adults.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The assessments included the PASE, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Short Physical Performance Battery and Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF36), and the Mini Mental State Test.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that the Turkish version of the PASE has powerful measurement qualities, which makes it a reliable and valid scale for the fields of research and practice
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to describe the cultural adaptation of the Turkish Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and to examine the reliability and validity of the scale in older Turkish adults. Materials and methods: Eighty elderly people were recruited for the study. The assessments included the PASE, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Short Physical Performance Battery and Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF36), and the Mini Mental State Test. Outcome measures were conducted twice within a week (test-retest) for reliability. Results: Cronbach s α coefficient was 0.714 for the initial evaluation. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the test-retest reliability was 0.995 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.993 0.997. A high level of positive correlation (0.742, P < 0.001) was found between the total score of PASE and the total scores of IPAQ. There were strong positive correlations between the PASE and the total score of SPPB (0.622, P < 0.001), while an average level of positive correlation with SF-36 was found (0.432, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that the Turkish version of the PASE has powerful measurement qualities, which makes it a reliable and valid scale for the fields of research and practice

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KILINÇ, M., AYVAT, E., KIRDI, N. (2022). The Turkish version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): its cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 908–915. https://ajindex.com/articles/610554

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. US Department of Health & Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of The Surgeon General. 1st ed. Atlanta, GA, USA: US Department of Health & Human Services; 1996
  2. Kruk J. Physical activity in the prevention of the most frequent chronic diseases: an analysis of the recent evidence. Asian Pac J Cancer P 2007; 8: 325-338
  3. Shephard RJ. Physical fitness: exercise and ageing. In: Pathy MSJ, editor. Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons; 1991. pp. 279- 294
  4. Spirduso WW, Cronin DL. Exercise dose-response effects on quality of life and independent living in older adults. Med Sci Sport Exer 2001; 33: 598-608
  5. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sport Exer 1998; 30: 992-1008
  6. Westerterp KR. Assessment of physical activity level in relation to obesity: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sport Exer 1999; 3: 522-525
  7. Melanson EL Jr, Freedson PS. Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. CRC Cr Rev Food Sci 1996; 36: 385-396
  8. Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Brit J Sport Med 2003; 37: 197-206
  9. Washburn RA. Assessment of physical activity in older adults. Res Q Exercise Sport 2000; 71: 79-87
  10. Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The PhysicalActivity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) - development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 153-162
  11. Harada ND, Chiu V, King AC, Stewart AL. An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Med Sci Sport Exer 2001; 33: 962-970
  12. Washburn RA, McAuley E, Katula J, Mihalko SL, Boileau RA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): evidence for validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 643-651
  13. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186-3191
  14. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Ince DI, Guclu MB, Karabulut E, Tokgozoglu L. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Motor Skills 2010; 111: 278-284
  15. Fisher S, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS, Graham JE, Ostir GV. Short Physical Performance Battery in hospitalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2009; 21: 445-452
  16. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Sf-36): 1. Conceptual framework and item sel