Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Using fuzzy logic for diagnosis and classification of spasticity

Sayfa
148–160
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: A FLC was successfully designed to detect and identify spasticity in spite of existing measurement difficulties in its nature.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: Spasticity is generally defined as a sensory-motor control disorder.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A Mamdani-type multiple-input, single-output FLC with 64 rules was developed to analyze EMG signals.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: A FLC was successfully designed to detect and identify spasticity in spite of existing measurement difficulties in its nature.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: Spasticity is generally defined as a sensory-motor control disorder. However, there is no pathophysiological mechanism or appropriate measurement and evaluation standards that can explain all aspects of a possible spasticity occurrence. The objective of this study is to develop a fuzzy logic classifier (FLC) diagnosis system, in which a quantitative evaluation is performed by surface electromyography (EMG), and investigate underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of spasticity. Materials and methods: Surface EMG signals recorded from the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius muscles of hemiplegic patients with spasticity and a healthy control group were analyzed in standing, resting, dorsal flexion, and plantar flexion positions. The signals were processed with different methods: by using their amplitudes in the time domain, by applying short-time Fourier transform, and by applying wavelet transform. A Mamdani-type multiple-input, single-output FLC with 64 rules was developed to analyze EMG signals. Results: The wavelet transform provided better positive findings among all three methods used in this study. The FLC test results showed that the test was 100% sensitive to identify spasticity with 95.8% accuracy and 93.8% specificity. Conclusion: A FLC was successfully designed to detect and identify spasticity in spite of existing measurement difficulties in its nature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANAL, M. R., ALCAN, V., ZİNNUROĞLU, M. (2022). Using fuzzy logic for diagnosis and classification of spasticity. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 148–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/610423

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, van Wijck F, Burridge J, Hermens H, Johnson GR. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 2-6
  2. Nance PW, Satkunam L, Ethans K. Spasticity management. In: Braddom RL, editor. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. pp. 638-656
  3. Pandyan AD, van Wijck FMJ, Stark S, Vuadens P, Johnson GR, Barnes MP. The construct validity of a spasticity measurement device for clinical practice: An alternative to the Ashworth scales. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 579-585. 4. van der Krogt HJM, Meskers CGM, de Groot JH, Klomp A, Arendzen JH. The gap between clinical gaze and systematic assessment of movement disorders after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 61
  4. Malhotra S, Pandyan AD, Day CR, Jones PW, Hermens HJ. Spasticity, an impairment that is poorly defined and poorly measured. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 651-658
  5. Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CI, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 373-383
  6. Alibiglou L, Rymer WZ, Harvey RL, Mirbagheri MM. The relation between Ashworth scores and neuromechanical measurements of spasticity following stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008; 5: 18
  7. Lebiedowska MK, Fisk JR. Knee resistance during passive stretch in patients with hypertonia. J Neurosci Methods 2009; 179: 323- 330
  8. Calota A, Feldman A, Levin MF. Spasticity measurement based on tonic stretch reflex threshold in stroke using a portable device. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 2329-2337
  9. Starsky AJ, Sangani SG, McGuire JR, Logan B, Schmit BD. Reliability of biomechanical spasticity measurements at the elbow of people poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2005; 86: 1648-1654
  10. Katz RT, Rovai CP, Brait C, Rymer WZ. Objective quantification of spastic hypertonia: correlation with clinical findings. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1992; 73: 339-347
  11. Crone C, Johnsen LL, Biering-Sorensen F, Nielsen JB. Appearance of reciprocal facilitation of ankle extensors from ankle flexors in patients with stroke or spinal cord injury. Brain 2003; 126: 495- 507
  12. Nuyens GE, De Weerdt WJ, Spaepen AJ, Kiekens C, Feys HM. Reduction of spastic hypertonia during repeated passive knee movements in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2002; 83: 930-935
  13. Tekgül H, Polat M, Tosun A, Serdaroğlu G, Gökben S.