Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4

Risk factors for recurrent central line-associated bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit

Sayfa
1128–1136
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Using transparent polyurethane dressings instead of sterile gauze for maintaining the CVC and delaying the reinsertion procedure for at least 4 days after the negative culture might be helpful in preventing recurrent CLABSI.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: It is recommended that a central venous catheter (CVC) be removed if central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) has been diagnosed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Thirty-one patients with initial CLABSI had reinserted CVCs, and 12 (38.7%) of these patients were diagnosed with recurrent CLABSI.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Using transparent polyurethane dressings instead of sterile gauze for maintaining the CVC and delaying the reinsertion procedure for at least 4 days after the negative culture might be helpful in preventing recurrent CLABSI.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: It is recommended that a central venous catheter (CVC) be removed if central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) has been diagnosed. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the risk factors for recurrent CLABSI in reinserted catheters in a pediatric intensive care unit. Materials and methods: Patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent CLABSI were compared in terms of the catheter exchange interval, the interval between negative blood culture and reinsertion of the CVC, and the pre-/reinsertion treatment duration. Results: Thirty-one patients with initial CLABSI had reinserted CVCs, and 12 (38.7%) of these patients were diagnosed with recurrent CLABSI. In the recurrent group, the catheter exchange interval, the interval between negative blood culture and reinsertion of the second CVC, and pre-/reinsertion treatment duration were found to be shorter. Logistic regression analysis revealed that if the interval between negative blood culture and reinsertion of the second CVC was shorter than 4 days, recurrent CLABSI risk increased by 1.7-fold (P = 0.021). Sterile gauze-dressed patients had shorter cumulative catheter surveys than the polyurethane-dressed patients (P = 0.005). Conclusion: Using transparent polyurethane dressings instead of sterile gauze for maintaining the CVC and delaying the reinsertion procedure for at least 4 days after the negative culture might be helpful in preventing recurrent CLABSI.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AĞIN, H., DEVRİM, İ., CEYLAN, G., İŞGÜDER, R., KARA, A., GÜLFİDAN, G. (2022). Risk factors for recurrent central line-associated bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4, 1128–1136. https://ajindex.com/articles/610413

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Hatler C, Buckwald L, Salas-Allison Z, Murphy-Taylor C. Evaluating central venous catheter care in a pediatric intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 2009; 18: 514-520
  2. Randolph AG, Brun-Buisson C, Goldmann D. Identification of central venous catheter-related infections in infants and children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005; 6: 19-24
  3. Tomlinson D, Mermel LA, Ethier MC, Matlow A, Gillmeister B, Sung L. Defining bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53: 697-710
  4. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39: 1-34
  5. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O’Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz RJ, Warren DK. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 1-45
  6. Flynn PM, Willis B, Gaur AH, Shenep JL. Catheter design influences recurrence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in children with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 35
  7. Chin BS, Han SH, Lee HS, Jeong SJ, Choi H, Kim CO, Choi JY, Song YG, Kim JM. Risk factors for recurrent catheter-related infections after catheter-related bloodstream infections. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14: 16-21
  8. Erbay A, Ergönül O, Stoddard GJ, Samore MH. Recurrent catheter-related bloodstream infections: risk factors and outcome. Int J Infect Dis. 2006; 10: 396-400
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bloodstream Infection Event (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection and Non-Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection. Atlanta, GA, USA: CDC; 2017
  10. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE. PRISM III: an updated Pediatric Risk of Mortality score. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 743- 752
  11. Thomas D, Parameswaran N, Harish BN. Catheter related blood stream infections in the paediatric intensive care unit: a descriptive study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2013; 17: 135-139
  12. Hammarskjöld F, Berg S, Hanberger H, Taxbro K, Malmvall BE. Sustained low incidence of central venous catheter-related infections over six years in a Swedish hospital with an active central venous catheter team. Am J Infect Control 2014; 42: 122- 128
  13. Krishnaiah A, Soothill J, Wade A, Mok QQ, Ramnarayan P. Central veno