Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Radiological and functional comparison of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: transtibial versus anteromedial technique

Sayfa
455–461
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The TT group had increased tunnel enlargement, which mayhave uncertain long-term outcomes, compared with the AM group.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: This study aimed to compare radiological and functional outcomes of patients who had single-bundle anteriorcruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon grafts using transtibial (TT) versus anteromedial (AM)femoral tunnel drilling techniques.Materials and methods: Sixty patients who had been operated on between 2010 and 2013 were enrolled in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Tunnel positionsand widenings in the femur and tibia were evaluated with radiographs, arthrometric measurements with a Rolimeter arthrometer(Aircast, Summit, NJ, USA), stability assessment with Lachman and reverse pivot shift tests, and functional assessment with theInternational Knee Documentation Committee and Tegner and Lysholm scoring systems.Results: Tunnel enlargement in the sagittal and coronal planes of the femur was higher with the TT technique (P < 0.0001) and that ofthe coronal planes of the tibia was also higher with the TT technique (P = 0.01).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The TT group had increased tunnel enlargement, which mayhave uncertain long-term outcomes, compared with the AM group.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to compare radiological and functional outcomes of patients who had single-bundle anteriorcruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon grafts using transtibial (TT) versus anteromedial (AM)femoral tunnel drilling techniques.Materials and methods: Sixty patients who had been operated on between 2010 and 2013 were enrolled in this study. Tunnel positionsand widenings in the femur and tibia were evaluated with radiographs, arthrometric measurements with a Rolimeter arthrometer(Aircast, Summit, NJ, USA), stability assessment with Lachman and reverse pivot shift tests, and functional assessment with theInternational Knee Documentation Committee and Tegner and Lysholm scoring systems.Results: Tunnel enlargement in the sagittal and coronal planes of the femur was higher with the TT technique (P < 0.0001) and that ofthe coronal planes of the tibia was also higher with the TT technique (P = 0.01). During the assessment with the Rolimeter, the differencebetween sides was significant with the TT technique (P = 0.013). Positive results of the Lachman and reverse pivot shift tests were morefrequent with the TT technique (P < 0.05), and the Lysholm scores were higher with the AM technique (P = 0.001).Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts by either TT or AM technique demonstrated similar and excellent resultsin terms of functional outcomes at the end of the first postoperative year. The TT group had increased tunnel enlargement, which mayhave uncertain long-term outcomes, compared with the AM group.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZER, H., HARPUT, G., TAŞKESEN, A., SELEK, H. Y., BALTACI, Y. G., ÇETİNKAYA, M., ÖZER, M. (2022). Radiological and functional comparison of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: transtibial versus anteromedial technique. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 455–461. https://ajindex.com/articles/610318

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Höher J, Moller HD, Fu FH. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6: 231-240.
  2. Koutras G, Papadopoulos P, Terzidis IP, Gigis I, Pappas E. Short-term functional and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21: 1904-1909.
  3. Acar HI, Comert A, Özer H, Tekdemir I, Loukas M, Tubbs RS, Elhan A. Femoral seating position of endobutton in single incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 2008; 30: 630-643.
  4. Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tailroth K. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 7: 290-295.
  5. Berg EE, Pollard ME, Kang Q. Interarticular bone healing. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 189-195. L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD. Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1997; 5: 234-238.
  6. Arnold MP, Kooloos J, vanKampen. A single incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9: 194-199.
  7. Ahn JH, Jeong HJ, Ko CS, Ko TS, Kim JH. Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of tunnel location during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques. Clin Orthop 2013; 5: 26-35.
  8. Scanlan SF, Donahue JP, Andriacci TP. The in vivo relationship between anterior neutral position and loss of knee extension after transtibial ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 21: 74-79.
  9. Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizello G, Del Buono A, Mafulli N, Denaro V. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy 2013; 29: 1330-1337.
  10. Alentorn-Geli E, Samitier G, Alvarez P, Steinbacher G, Cugat R. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year