Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6

The relation between scapula fracture and the severity of trauma in blunt thoracic trauma

Sayfa
1228–1233
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The use of CT in blunt trauma candetermine SF that cannot be identified through physical examination or radiography, and the most commonly observed accompanyingdamage in these patients is rib fracture.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: The aim of this study was to determine the level of presence of scapula fractures (SFs) in cases of blunt thoracictrauma and to identify other injuries accompanying SF.Materials and methods: Blunt thoracic trauma cases with SF determined on direct radiography or computerized tomography (CT) werecategorized as Group 1.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Group 2 was constituted by selecting cases with high injury severity score (ISS) with no SF.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The use of CT in blunt trauma candetermine SF that cannot be identified through physical examination or radiography, and the most commonly observed accompanyingdamage in these patients is rib fracture.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to determine the level of presence of scapula fractures (SFs) in cases of blunt thoracictrauma and to identify other injuries accompanying SF.Materials and methods: Blunt thoracic trauma cases with SF determined on direct radiography or computerized tomography (CT) werecategorized as Group 1. Group 2 was constituted by selecting cases with high injury severity score (ISS) with no SF. The demographiccharacteristics and all injuries of the patients were evaluated.Results: SF was determined in 77 (11.3%) patients (Group 1), and Group 2 consisted of 607 patients. The ISS was significantly higher inGroup 1 (27.7 ± 16.1) than Group 2 (15.9 ± 9.5) (P < 0.001). The rate of SF with direct radiography was only 9.1%, and more than 90%of patients were evaluated using CT. The most common accompanying injury to SF was rib fracture (44.2%), and the odds ratio was 2.4(95% CI: 1.51–3.72).Conclusion: The incidence of SF in cases of blunt trauma was higher than in previous studies. The use of CT in blunt trauma candetermine SF that cannot be identified through physical examination or radiography, and the most commonly observed accompanyingdamage in these patients is rib fracture.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNAL, N., ÇOŞKUN, F., DENİZ, T., EROĞLU, O., KAYA, H. A. (2022). The relation between scapula fracture and the severity of trauma in blunt thoracic trauma. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6, 1228–1233. https://ajindex.com/articles/610296

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. LoCicero J 3rd, Mattox KL. Epidemiology of chest trauma. Surg Clin North Am 1989; 69: 15-19.
  2. Brown CV, Velmahos G, Wang D, Kennedy S, Demetriades D, Rhee P. Association of scapular fractures and blunt thoracic aortic injury: fact or fiction? Am Surg 2005; 71: 54-57.
  3. Stephens NG, Morgan AS, Corvo P, Bernstein BA. Significance of scapular fracture in the blunt-trauma patient. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26: 439-442.
  4. Scavenius M, Sloth C. Fractures of the scapula. Acta Orthop Belg 1996; 62: 129-132.
  5. Tinkoff GH, Reed JF 3rd, Megargel R, Alexander EL, 3rd, Murphy S, Jones MS. Delaware’s inclusive trauma system: impact on mortality. J Trauma 2010; 69: 245-252.
  6. Harris RD, Harris JH. The prevalence and significance of missed scapular fractures in blunt chest trauma. Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 747-750.
  7. Ozmen CA, Onat S, Aycicek D. Radiologic findings of thoracic trauma. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2017; 13: 1085-1089.
  8. Langdorf MI, Medak AJ, Hendey GW, Nishijima DK, Mower WR, Raja AS, Baumann BM, Anglin DR, Anderson CL, Lotfipour S et al. Prevalence and clinical import of thoracic injury identified by chest computed tomography but not chest radiography in blunt trauma: multicenter prospective cohort study. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 66: 589-600.
  9. Wiklund E, Koskinen SK, Linder F, Aslund PE, Eklof H. Whole body computed tomography for trauma patients in the Nordic countries 2014: survey shows significant differences and a need for common guidelines. Acta Radiol 2016; 57: 750-757.
  10. Corbacioglu SK, Er E, Aslan S, Seviner M, Aksel G, Dogan NO, Guler S, Bitir A. The significance of routine thoracic computed tomography in patients with blunt chest trauma. Injury 2015; 46: 849-853.
  11. Tadros AM, Lunsjo K, Czechowski J, Abu-Zidan FM. Multipleregion scapular fractures had more severe chest injury than single-region fractures: a prospective study of 107 blunt trauma patients. J Trauma 2007; 63: 889-893.
  12. Tadros AM, Lunsjo K, Czechowski J, Abu-Zidan FM. Causes of delayed diagnosis of scapular fractures. Injury 2008; 39: 314- 318. Salimi J, Khaji A, Karbakhsh M, Saadat S, Eftekhar B. Scapular fracture: lower severity and mortality. Sao Paulo Med J 2008; 126: 186-189.
  13. Akaraborworn O, Sangthong B, Thongkhao K, Chiniramol P, Kaewsaengrueang K. Scapular fractures and concomitant injuries. Chin J Traumatol 2012; 15: 297-299.
  14. Veysi VT, Mittal R, Agarwal S, Dosani A, Giannoudis PV. Multiple trauma and scapular fractures: so what? J Trauma 2003; 55: 1145-1147.
  15. Weening B, Walton C, Cole PA, Alanezi K, Hanson BP, B