KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Reliability and validity of the Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale

Hamdi TAŞLI
Ömer KARAKOÇ
Serdar KARAHATAY
Ümit AYDIN
Türker TÜRKER
Sayfa
212–216
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The correlation between the visual analogue scale and NOSE scores was 0.948.Conclusion: The T-NOSE scale is a valid instrument with good internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, andresponsiveness.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: The aim of this study was to validate the Turkish Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (T-NOSE) scale.Materials and methods: The NOSE scale was translated into Turkish.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the magnitude of the effect of surgery wereall investigated.Results: In total, 253 subjects were enrolled in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The correlation between the visual analogue scale and NOSE scores was 0.948.Conclusion: The T-NOSE scale is a valid instrument with good internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, andresponsiveness.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to validate the Turkish Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (T-NOSE) scale.Materials and methods: The NOSE scale was translated into Turkish. A prospective study was conducted involving adult subjects withnasal obstruction and a control group. The patients were divided into three groups, namely nasal septum deviation (NSD), septoplasty,and control groups. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the magnitude of the effect of surgery wereall investigated.Results: In total, 253 subjects were enrolled in the study. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.938 and 0.942 upon test and retest, respectively, whichproved good internal consistency. The mean kappa value was 0.82, indicating a high level of reproducibility. The difference betweenpostoperative and control groups was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). The T-NOSE score of the NSD group was 65.67 ± 16.77,while it was 10.75 ± 12.25 for the control group (P < 0.01). The mean score improved following septoplasty (P < 0.001). The magnitudeof the effect of surgery was considered high. The correlation between the visual analogue scale and NOSE scores was 0.948.Conclusion: The T-NOSE scale is a valid instrument with good internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, andresponsiveness.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAŞLI, H., KARAKOÇ, Ö., KARAHATAY, S., AYDIN, Ü., TÜRKER, T. (2022). Reliability and validity of the Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 212–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/610283

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Bezerra TF, Stewart MG, Fornazieri MA, Pilan RR, Pinna Fde R, Padua FG, Voegels RL. Quality of life assessment septoplasty in patients with nasal obstruction. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 78: 57-62.
  2. Tombu S, Daele J, Lefebvre P. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry in rhinoplasty. B-ENT 2010; 6: 3-11.
  3. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 157-163.
  4. Mondina M, Marro M, Maurice S, Stoll D, de Gabory L. French validation of the NOSE and Rhino QOL questionnaires in the management of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144: 988-993.
  5. Bezerra TF, Padua FG, Pilan RR, Stewart MG, Voegels RL. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire. Rhinology 2011; 49: 227-231.
  6. Mozzanica F, Urbani E, Atac M, Scottà G, Luciano K, Bulgheroni C, De Cristofaro V, Gera R, Schindler A, Ottaviani F. Reliability and validity of the Italian Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (I-NOSE) scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 3087-3094.
  7. Rhee JS, Sullivan CD, Frank DO, Kimbell JS, Garcia GJ. A systematic review of patient reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16: 219-225. World Health Organization. The economics of health and disease. WHO Chron 1971; 25: 20-24.
  8. Lachanas VA, Tsiouvaka S, Tsea M, Hajiioannou JK, Skoulakis CE. Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale for Greek patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151: 819-823.
  9. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, Cohen N, Cervin A, Douglas R, Gevaert P et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology 2012; 50: 1-12.
  10. Vaitkus S, Padervinskis E, Balsevicius T, Siupsinskiene N, Staikuniene J, Ryskiene S, Lisauskaite L, Vaitkus J. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 for Lithuanian patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 1843-1848.
  11. Lange B, Thilsing T, Al-kalemji A, Baelum J, Martinussen T, Kjeldsen A. The sino-nasal outcome test 22 validated for Danish patients. Dan Med Bull 2011; 58: A4235.