The Cronbach α for the PASIPD was 0.60.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the PASIPD survey is valid and reliable for developmentally and physically disabled Turkishindividuals and professionals can use it to assess physical activity level.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of Turkish translation of the Physical Activity Scale forIndividuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) in a disabled Turkish population.Materials and methods: Following the translation protocol of the PASIPD, the Turkish version of the PASIPD, Short Form-36, andInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire were administered to 198 developmentally and physically disabled individuals.Results: The Turkish version of the PASIPD was found to be reliable.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The ICC was 1.0 since all the respondents reported the same answers inthe test and retest.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Cronbach α for the PASIPD was 0.60.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the PASIPD survey is valid and reliable for developmentally and physically disabled Turkishindividuals and professionals can use it to assess physical activity level.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
Background/aim: The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of Turkish translation of the Physical Activity Scale forIndividuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) in a disabled Turkish population.Materials and methods: Following the translation protocol of the PASIPD, the Turkish version of the PASIPD, Short Form-36, andInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire were administered to 198 developmentally and physically disabled individuals.Results: The Turkish version of the PASIPD was found to be reliable. The domains of the Turkish version of the PASIPD were also foundto be valid. Four factors were obtained from the questionnaire. The ICC was 1.0 since all the respondents reported the same answers inthe test and retest. The Cronbach α for the PASIPD was 0.60.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the PASIPD survey is valid and reliable for developmentally and physically disabled Turkishindividuals and professionals can use it to assess physical activity level.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
TOPUZ, S., ULAŞ, K., HORASAN, G. D. (2022). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD). Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6, 1620–1625. https://ajindex.com/articles/610237
Shiroma EJ, Lee IM. Physical activity and cardiovascular health: lessons learned from epidemiological studies across age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Circulation 2010; 122 (7): 743- 752
Hoffman MD, Sheldahl LM, Buley KJ, Sandford PR. Physiological comparison of walking among bilateral aboveknee amputee and able-bodied subjects, and a model to account for the differences in metabolic cost. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78 (4): 385-392
Wezenberg D, van der Woude LH, Faber WX, de Haan A, Houdijk H. Relation between aerobic capacity and walking ability in older adults with a lower-limb amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013; 94 (9): 1714- 1720
Mohanty R, Lenka P, Equebal A, Kumar R. Comparison of energy cost in transtibial amputees using “prosthesis” and “crutches without prosthesis” for walking activities. Annals Physical Rehabilitation Medicine 2012; 55 (4): 252-262
Gretebeck RJ, Ferraro KF, Black DR, Holland K, Gretebeck KA. Longitudinal change in physical activity and disability in adults. American Journal of Health Behavior 2012; 36 (3): 385- 394. 6. de Hollander EL, Proper KI. Physical activity levels of adults with various physical disabilities. Preventive Medicine Reports 2018; 10: 370-376
Marck CH, Hadgkiss EJ, Weiland TJ, Van Der Meer DM, Pereira NG et al. Physical activity and associated levels of disability and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: a large international survey. BMC Neurology 2014; 14: 143
Dairo YM, Collett J, Dawes H, Oskrochi GR. Physical activity levels in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Preventive Medicine Reports 2016; 4: 209-219
Walsh D, Belton S, Meegan S. A comparison of physical activity, physical fitness levels, BMI and blood pressure of adults with intellectual disability, who do and do not take part in Special Olympics Ireland programmes: Results from the SOPHIE study. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 2018; 22 (2): 154-170
Smith TO, McKenna MC, Salter C, Hardeman W, Richardson K et al. A systematic review of the physical activity assessment tools used in primary care. Family Practice 2017; 34 (4): 384- 391
Sylvia LG, Bernstein EE, Hubbard JL, Keating L, Anderson EJ et al. A practical guide to measuring physical activity considerations for measuring physical activity. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Diet 2014; 114 (2): 199-208