Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Does glycerol have an effect on pain during nasal packing removal

Sayfa
246–250
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Althoughno significant difference was observed between the groups in the amount of bleeding, lower amounts of bleeding were seen in the sidethat received glycerol.Conclusion: Administration of glycerol is a cost-effective and easily performed method of analgesia for nasal packing removal inpatients who undergo endoscopic sinus surgery or with epistaxis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of lubricating and moistening of Merocel nasal packs with glycerolon reducing pain and bleeding during nasal packing removal in patients who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery or with epistaxis.Materials and methods: Fifty patients were included in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the glycerolgroup, glycerol was infiltrated into the Merocel packing in the nasal cavity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Althoughno significant difference was observed between the groups in the amount of bleeding, lower amounts of bleeding were seen in the sidethat received glycerol.Conclusion: Administration of glycerol is a cost-effective and easily performed method of analgesia for nasal packing removal inpatients who undergo endoscopic sinus surgery or with epistaxis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of lubricating and moistening of Merocel nasal packs with glycerolon reducing pain and bleeding during nasal packing removal in patients who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery or with epistaxis.Materials and methods: Fifty patients were included in the study. Glycerol was used on one side while saline was used on the other sideof the same patient as a control. All patients were blinded to which side received glycerol and which side received saline. In the glycerolgroup, glycerol was infiltrated into the Merocel packing in the nasal cavity. In the saline group, 0.9% saline solution was infiltrated intothe Merocel packing in the other nasal cavity of the same patient. Both applications were performed 15 min before removal of the packs.The patients were asked to score the severity of the pain that occurred in both nasal passages according to a visual analog scale (VAS).Bleeding was recorded as mild (no bleeding), moderate (leakage), and severe (active bleeding requiring intervention).Results: The mean VAS score was significantly lower in the glycerol group than in the saline group (3.02 vs. 4.86, P < 0.05). Althoughno significant difference was observed between the groups in the amount of bleeding, lower amounts of bleeding were seen in the sidethat received glycerol.Conclusion: Administration of glycerol is a cost-effective and easily performed method of analgesia for nasal packing removal inpatients who undergo endoscopic sinus surgery or with epistaxis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖRGÜLÜ, O., TUHANİOĞLU, B., ERKAN, S. O., ERKAN, Z. A., ÖZDAŞ, T. (2022). Does glycerol have an effect on pain during nasal packing removal. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 246–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/610228

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S. Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 1022-1024.
  2. Lachanas VA, Karadzias GT, Pinakas VG, Hadziioannou JK, Sandris VG. The use of tetracaine 0.25% solution in nasal packing removal. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20: 483-484.
  3. Weber R, Hochapfel F, Draf W. Packing and stents in endonasal surgery. Rhinology 2000; 38: 49-62.
  4. Lemmens W, Lemkens P. Septal suturing following nasal septoplasty, a valid alternative for nasal packing? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2001; 55: 215-221.
  5. Erkan AN, Çakmak Ö. Attitudes among ENT surgeons towards the use of nasal tamponade after nasal septal surgery. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi 2007; 17: 301-306 (in Turkish with abstract in English). Laing MR, Clark LJ. Analgesia and removal of nasal packing. Clin Otolaryngol 1990; 15: 339-342.
  6. Celebi S, Caglar E, Develioglu ON, Topak M, Yalcin E, Kulekci M. The effect of the duration of merocel in a glove finger on postoperative morbidity. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24: 1232-1234.
  7. Nunez DA, Martin FW. An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1991; 16: 549-550.
  8. Von Schoenberg M, Robinson P, Ryan R. Nasal packing after routine surgery: is it justified? J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107: 902- 905. Saab M, Randall PE. Nasal packing for epistaxis: two methods compared. Eur J Emerg Med. 1997; 4: 44. Corbridge RJ, Djazeaeri B, Hellier WP, Hadley J. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the use of Merocel nasal tampons and BIPP in the control of acute epistaxis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995; 20: 305-307.
  9. Garth RJ, Brightwell AP. A comparison of packing materials used in nasal surgery. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108: 564-566. Fanous N. The absorbable nasal pack. J Otolaryngol 1980; 9: 462-467.
  10. Guyuron B, Vaughan C. Evaluation of stents following septoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19: 75-77.
  11. Hwang JH, Liu CM, Liu TC, Hsu MC. Sphenopalatine ganglion block before removal of nasal packing. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1423-1424.
  12. Kuo MJ, Zeitoun H, Macnamara M, Wagstaff K, Carlin WV, Turner N. The use of topical 5% lignocaine ointment for the relief of pain associated with post-operative nasal packing. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995; 20: 357-359.
  13. Lavy JA, Small GV, Jay N, Radcliffe GJ. A prospective randomized controlled study of 4% lignocaine solution in Merocel nasal pack removal. Rhinology 1996; 34: 219-221.
  14. Durvasula VS, Brewis C, Syeda F, Leong P. Lignocain