Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and phase angle in geriatric gastrointestinal cancer patients: before and after chemotherapy

Sayfa
583–588
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Patients should be followed up carefully for sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and nutritional aspect and it would beproper to intervene before sarcopenia has not occurred yet.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to determine sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and phase angle (PA) and the influence ofchemotherapy (CT) on anthropometric measurements and and the PA in in geriatric patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.Material and methods: The anthropometric measurements, calf circumference (CC), upper midarm circumference (UMAC), and handgrip strength (HGS), have been measured to understand muscle function of 153 patients (mean age of 70.5 ± 5.6 years, 28.8% female,71.2% male).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The same evaluations werechecked again after 1 cycle of CT (min: 4, max: 6 weeks).Results: Patient population consisted of colorectal (51,6%), gastric (26.8%), pancreas (11.8%), liver (7.2%), and biliary tract cancer (2%).UMAC (28.5 ± 4.4 before, 28.1 ± 4.9, P = 0.034 after CT), and HGS measurements (27.5 ± 8.6 before, 26.8 ± 8.8 after CT, P = 0.007)have significantly decreased after CT.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Patients should be followed up carefully for sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and nutritional aspect and it would beproper to intervene before sarcopenia has not occurred yet.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to determine sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and phase angle (PA) and the influence ofchemotherapy (CT) on anthropometric measurements and and the PA in in geriatric patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.Material and methods: The anthropometric measurements, calf circumference (CC), upper midarm circumference (UMAC), and handgrip strength (HGS), have been measured to understand muscle function of 153 patients (mean age of 70.5 ± 5.6 years, 28.8% female,71.2% male). Sarcopenia and PA measurements have been evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analyses. The same evaluations werechecked again after 1 cycle of CT (min: 4, max: 6 weeks).Results: Patient population consisted of colorectal (51,6%), gastric (26.8%), pancreas (11.8%), liver (7.2%), and biliary tract cancer (2%).UMAC (28.5 ± 4.4 before, 28.1 ± 4.9, P = 0.034 after CT), and HGS measurements (27.5 ± 8.6 before, 26.8 ± 8.8 after CT, P = 0.007)have significantly decreased after CT. CC measurement < 31 cm at first visit was seen in 13.1% of patients, but the ratio raised to 20.3%after CT (χ², P = 0.003). Severe sarcopenia was determined in 33% of all patients, and 30.0% of them have been considered as sarcopenicobese.Conclusion: Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity were prevalent in this group patients. The CT caused a decrease in muscle functions,UMAC, and CC. Patients should be followed up carefully for sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and nutritional aspect and it would beproper to intervene before sarcopenia has not occurred yet.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UYAR, M., MESERİ, R., USLU, R., ÇEHRELİ, R., BIÇAKLI, D. H., ÖZVEREN, A., KARABULUT, B., AKÇİÇEK, F. (2022). Evaluation of sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and phase angle in geriatric gastrointestinal cancer patients: before and after chemotherapy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 583–588. https://ajindex.com/articles/610150

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Landi F, Liperoti R, Fusco D, Mastropaolo S, Quattrociocchi D, Proia A, Tosato M, Bernabei R, Onder G. Sarcopenia and mortality among older nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012; 13: 121-126
  2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010; 39: 412-423
  3. Waters DL, Baumgartner RN. Sarcopenia and obesity. Clin Geriatr Med 2011; 27: 401-421
  4. Batsis JA, Mackenzie TA, Barre LK, Lopez-Jimenez F, Bartels SJ. Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and mortality in older adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 68: 1001-1007
  5. Reijnierse EM, Trappenburg MC, Leter MJ, Blauw GJ, de van der Schueren MA, Meskers CG, Maier AB. The association between parameters of malnutrition and diagnostic measures of sarcopenia in geriatric outpatients. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0135933
  6. Beaudart C, Reginster JY, Slomian J, Buckinx F, Dardenne N, Quabron A, Slangen C, Gillain S, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Estimation of sarcopenia prevalence using various assessment tools. Exp Gerontol 2015; 61: 31-37
  7. Barbosa-Silva MC, Barros AJ, Post CL, Waitzberg DL, Heymsfield SB. Can bioelectrical impedance analysis identify malnutrition in preoperative nutrition assessment? Nutrition 2003; 19: 422-426
  8. Gupta D, Lis CG, Dahlk SL, Vashi PG, Grutsch JF, Lammersfeld CA. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Nutr 2004; 92: 957-962
  9. Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, King J, Dahlk SL, Grutsch JF, Lis CG. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2008; 8: 249
  10. Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, King J, Dahlk SL, et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2009; 9: 37
  11. Bicakli DH, Ozveren A, Uslu R, Dalak RM, Cehreli R, Uyar M5 Karabulut B, Akcicek F. The effect of chemotherapy on nutritional status and weakness in geriatric gastrointestinal system cancer patients. Nutrition 2018; 47: 39-42
  12. Guigoz Y. The mini-nutritional assessment (MNA) review of the literature - What does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging 2006; 10: 466-487
  13. Janssen I