KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score

Şeyda CANDENİZ
Batuhan BAKIRARAR
Seyit ÇITAKER
Sayfa
1707–1714
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has five factors.Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present.Conclusion: It was found that the Turkish version of the NOOS is valid and reliable.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS).Materials and methods: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Test–retestreliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2, 1) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has five factors.Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present.Conclusion: It was found that the Turkish version of the NOOS is valid and reliable.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS).Materials and methods: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test–retestreliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2, 1) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Thedimensionality was investigated with the factor analysis. The construct validity was determined by testing whether the hypothesisof correlations between NOOS subscales, Short Form-36 subscales, and the Neck Disability Index were met using Spearman’s rankcorrelation coefficient. Ceiling/floor effects and measurement error were tested as well.Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient results varied between 0.721 and 0.844. Cronbach’s alpha values of the subscale were foundto be between 0.847 and 0.916 in the internal consistency analysis. The factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has five factors.Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present.Conclusion: It was found that the Turkish version of the NOOS is valid and reliable.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANDENİZ, Ş., BAKIRARAR, B., ÇITAKER, S. (2022). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6, 1707–1714. https://ajindex.com/articles/610087

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carrol L. The factor associated with neck pain and its related disability in the Saskatchewan population. Spine 2000; 25 (9): 1109-1117
  2. Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley et al. Neck pain: Revision 2017: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability and health from the orthopaedic section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2017; 47 (7): 1-83
  3. Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD. The empowerment of people with neck pain: introduction. European Spine Journal 2008; 17 (1): 8-13
  4. Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, Cherkin DC, Keller RB et al. Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine 1994; 19 (18): 2032-2036
  5. Yapali G, Günel MK, Karahan S. The cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain: Turkish version study. Spine 2012; 37 (11): 678-682
  6. Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26 (16): 959-962
  7. Telci EA, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek İE et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine 2009; 34 (16): 1732-1735
  8. Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2008; 31 (7): 491- 502
  9. Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, Henrica C et al. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research 2012; 21 (4): 659-670
  10. Ailliet L, Knol DL, Rubinstein SM, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW et al. Definition of the construct to be measured is a prerequisite for the assessment of validity. The Neck Disability Index as an example. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013; 66 (7): 775-782
  11. Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2009; 39 (5): 400-417
  12. Juul T, Søgaard K, Roos EM, Davis AM. Development of a patient-reported outcome: the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS)– Content and construct va