Does different subfertility etiology affect pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles?

Live birth rates in the male infertility group were comparable to the endometriosis and unexpected infertility groups (6.6%,11.9%, and 10.3%, respectively; P = 0.63).Conclusion: The success rate of the mild male subfertility group following COS–IUI cycles for live birth rates was similar to those of theendometriosis and unexplained subfertility groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯

Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: To investigate the relationship between subfertility etiologies and success rates in controlled ovarian stimulation andintrauterine insemination (COS–IUI) cycles.Materials and methods: The medical records of 218 couples who applied to a university-based fertility center were analyzedretrospectively.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:The primary outcome measure was live birth rate.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding demographics except for total motile spermcount.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:Live birth rates in the male infertility group were comparable to the endometriosis and unexpected infertility groups (6.6%,11.9%, and 10.3%, respectively; P = 0.63).Conclusion: The success rate of the mild male subfertility group following COS–IUI cycles for live birth rates was similar to those of theendometriosis and unexplained subfertility groups.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: To investigate the relationship between subfertility etiologies and success rates in controlled ovarian stimulation andintrauterine insemination (COS–IUI) cycles.Materials and methods: The medical records of 218 couples who applied to a university-based fertility center were analyzedretrospectively. Detailed infertility examination data and pregnancy outcomes were compared according to different subfertilityetiologies. The study groups with regard to subfertility etiologies were minimal–mild endometriosis, unexplained infertility, and mildmale infertility. The primary outcome measure was live birth rate.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding demographics except for total motile spermcount. Live birth rates in the male infertility group were comparable to the endometriosis and unexpected infertility groups (6.6%,11.9%, and 10.3%, respectively; P = 0.63).Conclusion: The success rate of the mild male subfertility group following COS–IUI cycles for live birth rates was similar to those of theendometriosis and unexplained subfertility groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATABEKOĞLU, C. S., ÖZMEN, B., TURGAY, B., SÖNMEZER, M., AYTAÇ, R., BERKER, B., ŞÜKÜR, Y. E. (2022). Does different subfertility etiology affect pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5, 1439–1443. https://ajindex.com/articles/609878

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

Stephen EH, Chandra A. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: 1982–2002. Fertility and Sterility 2006; 86(3): 516-523. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.129 2. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 71(4): 684-689. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00519-6 3. Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D’Hooghe T, Dunselman G et al. ESHRE Special Interest Group for Endometriosis and Endometrium Guideline Development Group. ESHRE guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Human Reproduction 2005; 20(10): 2698-2704. doi: 10.1093/ humrep/dei135 4. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Effectiveness and treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertility and Sterility 2006; 86(5 Suppl 1): S111-S114. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1475 5. Francavilla F, Sciarretta F, Sorgentone S, Necozione S, Santucci R et al. Intrauterine insemination with or without mild ovarian stimulation in couples with male subfertility due to oligo/ astheno- and/or teratozoospermia or antisperm antibodies: a prospective cross-over trial. Fertility and Sterility 2009; 92(3): 1009-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.112 6. Hull MG. Effectiveness of infertility treatments: choice and comparative analysis. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1994; 47(2): 99-108. doi: 10.1016/0020- 7292(94)90348-4 7. Diamond MP, Legro RS, Coutifaris C, Alvero R, Robinson RD et al. Letrozole, gonadotropin, or clomiphene for unexplained infertility. The New England Journal of Medicine 2015; 373(13): 1230-1240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414827 8. Veltman-Verhulst SM, Hughes E, Ayeleke RO, Cohlen BJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2016; 19; 2:CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub5 9. The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM). European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, Erb K et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction 2017; 32(10): 1957-1973. doi: 10.1093/humrep/ dex264 10. Guzick, DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. The New England Jo