Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 6

Biliary stents are forgotten more frequently in elderly patients

Sayfa
3067–3072
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Communication with the patient to remind them of the need for stent management is important for preventing FBSs.Key words: Biliary stents, elderly patients

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: Plastic biliary stents that remain in situ for more than 12 months, called forgotten biliary stents (FBSs), can cause complications such as cholangitis, stent migration, stent occlusion, and perforation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: The medical records of patients who underwent ERCP procedures from December 2016 to December 2020 were analysed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Communication with the patient to remind them of the need for stent management is important for preventing FBSs.Key words: Biliary stents, elderly patients
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: Plastic biliary stents that remain in situ for more than 12 months, called forgotten biliary stents (FBSs), can cause complications such as cholangitis, stent migration, stent occlusion, and perforation. Materials and methods: The medical records of patients who underwent ERCP procedures from December 2016 to December 2020 were analysed retrospectively. Data on patient characteristics, indications for ERCP and stenting, stent types, stenting duration, complications, and causes of FBSs were obtained from the hospital’s database. Results: A total of 48 cases with FBSs were analysed. The mean age (SD) of the patients was 71.23 years (±12.165), the male-to-female ratio was 23/25 (0.92), and the mean stenting duration was 27.12 months (range: 12–84 months). The most common indication for biliary stenting was irretrievable choledochal stones (40/48). Stone formation (79%) and proximal stent migration (26.4%) were the most frequent complications. The patients in the FBS group were significantly older than those from whom stents were removed in a timely manner (71.23 vs. 62.43 years, p < 0.001). Endoscopic treatment was possible in all cases; surgery was not required in any case. The most common cause of FBSs cited by patients was not having been informed about the need for long-term management of their stents (n = 14, 29.2%) Conclusion: FBSs are potentially problematic particularly in elderly patients. Communication with the patient to remind them of the need for stent management is important for preventing FBSs.Key words: Biliary stents, elderly patients

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HÜLAGÜ, S., DUMAN, A. E., YILMAZ, H. (2022). Biliary stents are forgotten more frequently in elderly patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 6, 3067–3072. https://ajindex.com/articles/609371

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Dumonceau J, Tringali A, Blero D, Devière J, Laugiers R et al.Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012
  2. 44(3):277-298. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1291633 2. Bajbouj M, Treiber M, Ludwig L, Frimberger E, Schmid RM et al. Forgotten biliary endoprosthesis.“Follow up” after 10 years. Endoscopy 2008
  3. 40 Suppl 2:E221. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1077431 3. Poushanchi B, Hsueh W, Nasr J. Cholangioscopic forcepsassisted retrieval of a forgotten biliary stent through a distal biliary stricture. VideoGIE 2018
  4. 3(11):349-350. doi:10.1016/j. vgie.2018.07.016 4. Kumar S, Chandra A. Giant stentolith: A rare complication of long-dwelling biliary endoprosthesis. Arab Journal of Gastroenterology 2020
  5. 21(2):132-134. doi:10.1016/j. ajg.2020.04.008 5. Sran H, Sebastian J, Doughan S. The forgotten biliary stent: an unusual cause of diarrhea. Clinical Case Reports 2016
  6. 4(9):902-903. doi:10.1002/ccr3.637 6. Frost A, Taylor MA, Parks RW. An unusual cause of haemobilia--beware the forgotten stent!. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2007
  7. 61(5):877-878. doi:10.1111/j.1742- 1241.2006.00943.x 7. Odabasi M, Arslan C, Akbulut S, Abuoglu HH, Ozkan E et al. Long-term effects of forgotten biliary stents: a case series and literature review. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2014
  8. 7(8):2045-2052 8. Sohn SH, Park JH, Kim KH, Kim TN. Complications and management of forgotten long-term biliary stents. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2017
  9. 23(4):622-628. doi:10.3748/ wjg.v23.i4.622 9. Kumar S, Chandra A, Kulkarni R, Maurya AP, Gupta V. Forgotten biliary stents: ignorance is not bliss. Surgical Endoscopy 2018
  10. 32(1):191-195. doi:10.1007/s00464-017- 5657-z 10. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Kato N, Kamijima T et al. Biliary stenting in the management of large or multiple common bile duct stones. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2010
  11. 71(7):1200-1203. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.055 11. Han J, Moon JH, Koo HC, Kang JH, Choi JH et al. Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2009
  12. 104(10):2418-2421. doi:10.1038/ ajg.2009.303. 12. Hong WD, Zhu QH, Huang QK. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoprostheses in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct stones. Digestive Endoscopy 2011
  13. 23(3):240- 243. doi:10.1111/j.1443-16