Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

Additional gastric resection after one anastomosis gastric bypass–are there benefits?

Sayfa
420–426
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The addition of resection of the gastric fundus and corpus to an OAGB has no impact on postoperative weight loss or metabolic outcomes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: Mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) is a bariatric surgery procedure that has proved effective for weight loss and the resolution of metabolic disorders.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: This retrospective study recorded and evaluated the data of 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic OAGB due to morbid obesity (Body Mass Index-BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) in our clinic between January 2018 and January 2020.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The addition of resection of the gastric fundus and corpus to an OAGB has no impact on postoperative weight loss or metabolic outcomes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: Mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) is a bariatric surgery procedure that has proved effective for weight loss and the resolution of metabolic disorders. The present study evaluates the effect on postoperative outcomes of resecting the corpus and fundus as an addition to OAGB. Materials and methods: This retrospective study recorded and evaluated the data of 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic OAGB due to morbid obesity (Body Mass Index-BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) in our clinic between January 2018 and January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: the first group comprised patients undergoing standard OAGB (n = 49), while the second group included those undergoing OAGB plus (OAGB with additional corpus and fundus resection) (n = 34). The patient data recorded for comparison included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative weight (at 6 and 12 months), body mass index (BMI), excess weight loss% (EWL%), excess BMI loss% (EBL%), and total body weight loss% (TBWL%), hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose (FBG), albumin and HbA1c levels. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, gender or comorbidities. The operating time, the number of cartridges used during the operation and the length of hospital stay were statistically higher in the OAGB plus group (p = 0.039, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups regarding weight, BMI, EBL% and TBWL% preoperatively and at 6- and 12-months postsurgery. There was also no statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative (at months 6 and 12) levels of hemoglobin, FBG, albumin, and HbA1c between the two groups. Conclusion: The addition of resection of the gastric fundus and corpus to an OAGB has no impact on postoperative weight loss or metabolic outcomes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TÜRKOĞLU, M. A., ERDOĞDU, U. E., ÇAYCI, H. M., ARSLAN, U., TARDU, A., ÇANTAY, H., DOĞAN, G. (2022). Additional gastric resection after one anastomosis gastric bypass–are there benefits?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 420–426. https://ajindex.com/articles/609288

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Fryar CD, Carrol MD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and extreme obesity among adults: United States, trends 1960–1962 through 2009–2010, 2012. National Center of Health. Statistics, 2014
  2. Buchwald H, Varco RL. Ileal bypass in patients with hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. Preliminary report on therapeutic potential. JAMA 1966; 196:627-630
  3. Deitel M. Letter to the Editor: Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013 Reveals a Rise in Mini Gastric Bypass. Obesity Surgery 2015; 25:2165. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1827-z 4. Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obesity Surgery 2001; 11: 276-280. doi: 10.1381/096089201321336584 5. Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, Chen TC, Wei PL, Huang MT. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Annals of Surgery 2005; 242:20- 28. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167762 6. Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, Castro MJ, Gonzalez G, Ortiz-de-Solorzano J et al. Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities. Surgical Endoscopy 2019;33:401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9 7. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, Higa K, Himpens J, Carbajo MA et al. Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement. Obesity Surgery 2018; 28: 1188-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3 8. Ramos AC, Chevallier JM, Mahawar K, Brown W, Kow L, White KP et al; IFSO Consensus Conference Contributors. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Results of a Modified Delphi Study. Obesity Surgery 2020; 30: 1625- 1634. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04519-y 9. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, Ortiz-deSolórzano J, Pérez-Miranda M, Castro-Alija MJ. Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Technique, Results, and Long-Term Follow-Up in 1200 Patients. Obesity Surgery 2017; 27: 1153-1167. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2428-1 10. Rosenthal RJ; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, Basso N, Bellanger D et al. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2012; 8: 8-19. doi: 10.1016