Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of organic load-related efficacy changes in antiseptic solutions used in hospitals

Sayfa
825–833
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: It is concluded that the antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic solutions is significantly affected by the organic substances and thus the proper use of antiseptics has become important to achieve successful disinfection and prevention of antibacterial resistance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the change in antimicrobial efficacy related to the presence of the organic load of four different antiseptic solutions that are frequently used in hospitals.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: Solutions of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, and ethyl alcohol were prepared, tested in terms of antimicrobial efficacy changes in the presence of organic substances, and evaluated according to EN 13727 and EN 13624 standards.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: It is concluded that the antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic solutions is significantly affected by the organic substances and thus the proper use of antiseptics has become important to achieve successful disinfection and prevention of antibacterial resistance.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the change in antimicrobial efficacy related to the presence of the organic load of four different antiseptic solutions that are frequently used in hospitals. Materials and methods: Solutions of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, and ethyl alcohol were prepared, tested in terms of antimicrobial efficacy changes in the presence of organic substances, and evaluated according to EN 13727 and EN 13624 standards. Results: Among the investigated solutions ethanol 70% solution showed the best results by providing a 5-log reduction on all test organisms without affecting by the type and concentration of organic substances. Solutions of hydrogen peroxide 3%, povidone-iodine 7.5%, and chlorhexidine digluconate 0.2% performed lower antimicrobial efficacy depending on the concentration of organic load. Conclusion: It is concluded that the antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic solutions is significantly affected by the organic substances and thus the proper use of antiseptics has become important to achieve successful disinfection and prevention of antibacterial resistance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAPAR, E. A., KARA, B. A., HALAT, E., ŞAHİNER, A. (2022). Evaluation of organic load-related efficacy changes in antiseptic solutions used in hospitals. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 825–833. https://ajindex.com/articles/609218

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Hoang TPN, Ghori MUU, Conway BR. Topical antiseptic formulations for skin and soft tissue infections. Pharmaceutics 2021
  2. 13(4): 558. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040558 2. Mcdonnell G, Russell D. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1999
  3. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.1.147 3. Şahiner A, Halat E, Algın Yapar E. Comparison of bactericidal and fungicidal efficacy of commonly used antiseptic formulations according to European standards EN 13727 and EN 13624. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2019
  4. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-53 4. Radischat N, Augustin M, Herberger K, Wille A, Goroncy‐ Bermes P. Influence of human wound exudate on the bactericidal efficacy of antiseptic agents in quantitative suspension tests on the basis of European Standards (DIN EN 13727). International wound journal 2020
  5. 17(3): 781-789. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13336 5. Chowdhury D, Rahman A, Hu H, Jensen SO, Deva AK et al. Effect of disinfectant formulation and organic soil on the efficacy of oxidizing disinfectants against biofilms. Journal of Hospital Infection 2019
  6. 103(1): 33-41. doi: 10.1016/j. jhin.2018.10.019 6. Carling PC, Bartley JM. Evaluating hygienic cleaning in health care settings: what you do not know can harm your patients. American Journal of Infection Control 2010
  7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.004 7. Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clinical Microbiology Review 2004
  8. 17(4): 863-893. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004 8. Kim JM, Park ES, Jeong JS, Kim KM, Kim JM et al. Multicenter surveillance study for nosocomial infections in major hospitals in Korea. Nosocomial infection surveillance committee of the Korean Society for Nosocomial Infection Control. American Journal of Infection Control 2000
  9. 454–458. doi: 10.1067/ mic.2000.107592 9. Pitten FA, Werner HP, Kramer A. A standardized test to assess the impact of different organic challenges on the antimicrobial activity of antiseptics. Journal of Hospital Infection 2003
  10. 55(2): 108-115. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00260-3 10. Nicolae Dopcea G, Diguta CF, Matei F, Dopcea I, Nanu AE. Resistance and cross-resistance in Staphylococcus spp. strains following prolonged exposure to different antiseptics. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance 2020
  11. 399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.10.021 11. EN 13727:2015. Chemical disinfectants. Quantitative suspensi