KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Mathematics / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

On λ-pseudo q -bi-starlike functions

Prakash KAMBLE
Mallikarjun SHRIGAN
Şahsene ALTINKAYA
Sayfa
751–758
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, we obtain certain sharp bounds of the Fekete–Szegö functional for functionsbelonging to this class.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Making use of the -pseudo-q -differential operator, we aim to investigate a new, interesting class of bi-starlikefunctions in the conic domain.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Making use of the -pseudo-q -differential operator, we aim to investigate a new, interesting class of bi-starlikefunctions in the conic domain.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, we obtain certain sharp bounds of the Fekete–Szegö functional for functionsbelonging to this class.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Making use of the -pseudo-q -differential operator, we aim to investigate a new, interesting class of bi-starlikefunctions in the conic domain. Furthermore, we obtain certain sharp bounds of the Fekete–Szegö functional for functionsbelonging to this class.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAMBLE, P., SHRIGAN, M., ALTINKAYA, Ş. (2022). On λ-pseudo q -bi-starlike functions. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 751–758. https://ajindex.com/articles/607705

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Abdel-Gawad HR, Thomas DK. The Fekete-Szegö coefficient problems for strongly close-to-convex functions. P Am Math Soc 1992; 114: 345-349
  2. Altinkaya Ş, Özkan SY. On Sălăgean type pseudo-starlike functions. Acta et Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis de Mathematica 2017; 21: 275-285
  3. Babalola KO. On -pseudo starlike functions. J Classical Anal 2013; 2: 137-147
  4. Darus M, Hussain S, Raza M, Sokół J. On a subclass of starlike functions. Result Math 2018; 73: 22
  5. Frasin BA, Auof MK. New subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Appl Math Lett 2011; 24: 1569-1673
  6. Ismail MEH, Merkes E, Styer D. A generalization of starlike functions. Complex Variable Theory Appl 1990; 14: 77-84
  7. Jahangiri JM, Hamidi SG. Coefficient estimates for certain classes of bi-univalent functions. Int J Math Math Sci 2013; 2013: 190560
  8. Joshi SB, Altinkaya Ş, Yalçin S. Coefficient estimates for Sălăgean type bi-pseudo-starlike functions. Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 2017; 57: 613-621
  9. Keogh FR, Merkes EP. A Coefficient inequality for certain classes of analytic functions. P Am Math Soc 1969; 20: 8-12
  10. Kamble PN, Shrigan MG. Initial coefficient estimates for bi-univalent functions. Far East J Math 2018; 102: 271-282
  11. Kamble PN, Shrigan MG, Srivastava HM. A novel subclass of univalent functions involving operators of fractional calculus. Int J Appl Math 2017; 30: 501-514
  12. Kanas S, Răducanu D. Conic regions and k-uniform convexity. J Comput Appl Math 1999; 105: 327-336
  13. Kanas S, Răducanu D. Some subclass of analytic functions related to conic domains. Math Slovaca 2014; 64: 1183-1196
  14. London RR, Thomas DK. The derivative of Bazilevic̆functions. P Am Math Soc 1988; 104: 85-89
  15. Ma W, Minda D. A Unified Treatment of Some Special Classes of Univalent Functions. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1994
  16. Purohit SD, Raina RK. Certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with fractional q-calculus operators. Math Scand 2011; 109: 55-70
  17. Robertson MS. Quasi-subordination and coefficient conjecture. B Am Math Soc 1970; 76: 1-9
  18. Singh R. On Bazilevic̆functions. B Am Math Soc 1973; 38: 261-271
  19. Srivastava HM. Univalent functions, fractional calculus, and associated generalized hypergeometric functions. In: Srivastava HM, Owa S, editors. Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 1989, pp. 329-354
  20. Srivastava HM, Altinkaya Ş, Yalçin S. Hankel dete