KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Comparison the effect of trained and untrained family presence on their anxiety during invasive procedures in an emergency department: A randomized controlled trial

Negahban Bonabi TAYEBEH
Zarei Fathabadi ALIREZA
Ansari Jaberi ALI
Sayfa
100–105
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, changes in the anxiety score were not significant between the groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The present study was aimed to compare the effect of the trained and untrained family presence on their anxiety during invasive procedures in an emergency department.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 90 patients who were candidates for receiving invasive nursing procedures were selected in an emergency department based on the inclusion criteria, and then were equally assigned into 3 groups by the random minimization method: A ("presence of the trained family member group "), B ("presence of the untrained family member group "), and C ("absence and untrained family member group").
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, changes in the anxiety score were not significant between the groups.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The present study was aimed to compare the effect of the trained and untrained family presence on their anxiety during invasive procedures in an emergency department. Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 90 patients who were candidates for receiving invasive nursing procedures were selected in an emergency department based on the inclusion criteria, and then were equally assigned into 3 groups by the random minimization method: A ("presence of the trained family member group "), B ("presence of the untrained family member group "), and C ("absence and untrained family member group"). The anxiety level was measured before and after implementation of the procedure using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The data were analyzed by SPSS software using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Chi-Square test, Kruskal Wallis Independent-Samples test, Paired Samples T-test, and ANOVA at the significance level of 0.05. Results: The three groups were similar in terms of demographic variables. In all three groups, the SATI score significantly decreased after intervention phase (p = 0.001). The mean changes of the SATI score were not statistically different between the groups. However, The STAI score decreased significantly after intervention in the group B compared to the group A (p = 0.011) and C (p = 0.042). However, there was no significant difference between the SATI score in the group A and C (p = 0.867). Conclusion: The results of the study revealed that, the “presence of the untrained" family members caused them to experience significantly less anxiety than the other two groups. However, changes in the anxiety score were not significant between the groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAYEBEH, N. B., ALIREZA, Z. F., ALI, A. J. (2022). Comparison the effect of trained and untrained family presence on their anxiety during invasive procedures in an emergency department: A randomized controlled trial. Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online), Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 100–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/605266

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. İşlekdemir B, Kaya N. Effect of family presence on pain and anxiety during invasive nursing procedures in an emergency department: a randomized controlled experimental study. International emergency nursing. 2016;24:39–45
  2. Arango P. Family-centered care. Academic Pediatrics. 2011;11(2):97
  3. Landis P. Holistic in the hectic: family presence during resuscitation in the emergency department. Holist Nurs Pract. 2018;32(3):123–124
  4. Solà JA, Bravo SS, Cotanda CP, de la Maza VTS, Cubells CL. Has the presence of parents during invasive procedures in the emergency department increased in the last few years? Anales de Pediatría (English Edition). 2015;82(1):6–11
  5. Çelik GK, Keles A, Demircan A, et al. Evaluation of patients' families' attitudes to witnessing invasive procedures in the emergency department/hasta yakinlarinin acil serviste yapilan girisimsel uygulamalar sirasinda hastalarinin yaninda bulunabilme istegi ile ilgili görüslerinin degerlendirilmesi. Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2013;12(2):61
  6. Bradley C, Keithline M, Petrocelli M, Scanlon M, Parkosewich J. Perceptions of adult hospitalized patients on family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Crit Care. 2017;26(3):103–110
  7. Yaka E, Ersoy G, Yanturali S. Family's satisfaction who witnessed their relatives' cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department. J Architect Educ. 2008;7:34–39
  8. Pratiwi ID. Family presence during resuscitation: patient and family members' preferences and attitudes. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2018;6(2):394–400
  9. Beesley SJ, Hopkins RO, Francis L, et al. Let them in: family presence during intensive care unit procedures. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;13(7):1155–1159
  10. Chapman R, Bushby A, Watkins R, Combs S. Australian Emergency Department health professionals' reasons to invite or not invite Family Witnessed Resuscitation: a qualitative perspective. International emergency nursing. 2014;22(1):18–24
  11. Porter JE, Cooper SJ, Sellick K. Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR): perceived benefits, barriers and enablers to implementation and practice. International emergency nursing. 2014;22(2):69–74
  12. Care F-C. Moving toward Person-and Family-Centered Care
  13. Park M, Lee M, Jeong H, Jeong M, Go Y. Patient-and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;87:69–83
  14. Goldfarb MJ, Bibas L,