Dergiler / Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Comparison between Emergency Severity Index plus peak flow meter and Emergency Severity Index in the dyspneic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized clinical trial

Sayfa
68–72
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We recommend using PEF for the triage of COPD patients in the ED.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: It is unclear whether the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) can identify high-risk patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to compare the mistriage rates of the ESI plus the Peak Expiratory Flowmeter (PEF) approach and ESI approach among dyspneic patients with COPD.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We recommend using PEF for the triage of COPD patients in the ED.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: It is unclear whether the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) can identify high-risk patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). This study aims to compare the mistriage rates of the ESI plus the Peak Expiratory Flowmeter (PEF) approach and ESI approach among dyspneic patients with COPD. Methods: This study was a randomized clinical trial conducted between July and October 2018. We randomly assigned COPD patients with dyspnea to the ESI + PEF or ESI groups. Triage levels, disposition rates, number of resources used, and time to first physician contact were compared in patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), the Pulmonary Care Unit (PU), or discharged from the ED. Reliability of the ESI was evaluated by using the interobserver agreement (Kappa). Results: Seventy COPD patients were equally assigned to the ESI + PEF and ESI groups. The under-triage rates were 11.42% and 0%, the over-triage rates were 31.42% and 2.85% in the ESI and ESI + PEF groups, respectively. The triage levels of the patients admitted to the ICU (2 vs. 3), the PU (2 vs. 4), or discharged from the ED (3 vs. 2) were significantly different between the ESI + PEF and ESI groups. Conclusions: Addition of PEF to the ESI provides a more accurate method for triaging COPD patients compared to ESI alone. We recommend using PEF for the triage of COPD patients in the ED.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ROUDI, M. H., EBRAHIMI, M., MALEKZADEH, J., MIRHAGHI, A., SHAKERI, M. (2022). Comparison between Emergency Severity Index plus peak flow meter and Emergency Severity Index in the dyspneic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized clinical trial. Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online), Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 68–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/605265

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Ford ES, Redd SC. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease surveillance–United States, 1971-2000. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Aug 2;51(6):1–16
  2. Smith I, Mackay J, Fahrid N, Krucheck D. Respiratory rate measurement: a comparison of methods. Br J Healthc Assistants. 2011 Jan;5(1):18–23
  3. Parkes R. Rate of respiration: the forgotten vital sign. Emerg Nurse. 2011 May;19(2):12–17
  4. Cretikos MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Chen J, Finfer S, Flabouris A. Respiratory rate: the neglected vital sign. Med J Aust. 2008 Jun 2;188(11):657
  5. Amalakanti S, Pentakota MR. Pulse oximetry overestimates oxygen saturation in COPD. Respir Care. 2016 Apr;61(4):423–427
  6. Pothirat C, Chaiwong W, Phetsuk N, et al. Peak expiratory flow rate as a surrogate for forced expiratory volume in 1 second in COPD severity classification in Thailand. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015 Jun 25;10:1213–1218
  7. Mahboub B, Alzaabi A, Soriano JB, et al. Case-finding of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with questionnaire, peak flow measurements and spirometry: a crosssectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Apr 16;7(1):241
  8. McGrath AM, Gardner DM, McCormack J. Is home peak expiratory flow monitoring effective for controlling asthma symptoms? J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001 Oct;26(5):311–317
  9. Natarajan S, Castner J, Titus AH. Smart phone-based peak expiratory flow meter. Electron Lett. 2016;52(11):904–905.
  10. Osarogiagbon WO1, Ibadin MO, Oviawe OS. Peak expiratory flow rate variability in apparently healthy school children aged 10-15 years in Oredo, Nigeria. Saudi Med J. 2008 Nov;29(11):1616–1620
  11. Garbez RO, Carrieri-Kohlman V, Stotts N, Chan G. Level 2 and level 3 patients in emergency severity index triage system: comparison of characteristics and resource utilization. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2011 Oct-Dec;33(4):322–335
  12. Mirhaghi A, Roudbari M. A survey on knowledge level of the nurses about hospital triage. Crit Care Nurse J. 2010;3(4):e7158
  13. Tian J, Zhou Y, Cui J, et al. Peak expiratory flow as a screening tool to detect airflow obstruction in a primary health care setting. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012 May;16(5):674–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.11.0429 Epub 2012 Mar 7
  14. Thorat YT, Salvi SS, Kodgule RR. Peak flow meter with a questionnaire and minispirometer to help detect asthma and COPD in real-life clinical practice: a crosssectional study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017;27:32
  15. Pourasghar F, Tabr