Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Maastrichtian-Thanetian planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and remarks on the K-Pg boundary in the southern Kocaeli Peninsula (NW Turkey

Sayfa
1–29
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The biostratigraphic resolution across theCretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) boundary in the studied sections cannot be improved due to the condensed and well-cemented pelagiccarbonates of the boundary interval.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Kocaeli Peninsula (NW Turkey) provides one of the best exposed deep marine Upper Cretaceous-Palaeocene sectionsin north-western Anatolia.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A very rich planktonic foraminiferal assemblageanalysed both in thin sections and washed residues records a biozonation ranging from theContusotruncana contusa(CF6) Zone(Maastrichtian) to theGlobanomalina pseudomenardii(P4) Zone (Thanetian).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The biostratigraphic resolution across theCretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) boundary in the studied sections cannot be improved due to the condensed and well-cemented pelagiccarbonates of the boundary interval.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The Kocaeli Peninsula (NW Turkey) provides one of the best exposed deep marine Upper Cretaceous-Palaeocene sectionsin north-western Anatolia. The biostratigraphic framework from three sections, namely Belen, Bulduk, and Toylar, in the southernpart of the Kocaeli Peninsula is established by means of planktonic foraminifera. A very rich planktonic foraminiferal assemblageanalysed both in thin sections and washed residues records a biozonation ranging from theContusotruncana contusa(CF6) Zone(Maastrichtian) to theGlobanomalina pseudomenardii(P4) Zone (Thanetian). Although a major part of the biozones in the studiedinterval is clearly defined, the upper three zones (CF1 3) of the latest Maastrichtian and the P0 and P1a zones of the earliest Palaeocenecannot be recognised. These unrecorded biozones are either completely missing or occurred within a very condensed interval in thestudied sections. A hardground layer characterised by oxidation and extensive bioturbation might indicate a possible biostratigraphicgap spanning the CF1 3 zones of the uppermost Maastrichtian in the Belen and Bulduk sections. In the Toylar section, on the otherhand, the CF1 3 zones still cannot be detected although a hardground layer is not observed. The biostratigraphic resolution across theCretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) boundary in the studied sections cannot be improved due to the condensed and well-cemented pelagiccarbonates of the boundary interval.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, İ. Ö., ÖZCAN, E., SARIGÜL, V., GENÇ, Ş. C., HAKYEMEZ, A., TÜYSÜZ, O. (2022). Maastrichtian-Thanetian planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and remarks on the K-Pg boundary in the southern Kocaeli Peninsula (NW Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 1–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/603082

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Abramovich S, Yovel-Corem S, Almogi-Labin A, Benjamini C (2010). Global climate change and planktic foraminiferal response in the Maastrichtian. Paleoceanography 25: PA2201. Adatte T, Keller G, Burns S, Stoykova KH, Ivanov MI, Vangelov D, Kramar U, Stueben D (2002). Paleoenvironment across the Cretaceous-Tertiary transition in eastern Bulgaria. Spec Pap Geol Soc Am 356: 231-251.
  2. Altınlı İE (1968). Geologic investigation of the İzmit-Hereke- Kurucadağ area. Bull Min Res Exp 71: 1-28.
  3. Altınlı İE, Soytürk N, Saka K (1970). Hereke-Tavşancıl- Tavşanlı- Tepecik alanının jeolojisi. İÜ Fen Fak Mecmuası 1-2: 69-75 (in Turkish). Arenillas I, Arz JA, Molina E, Dupuis C (2000). The Cretaceous/ Paleogene (K/P) boundary at Aïn Settara, Tunisia: sudden catastrophic mass extinction in planktic foraminifera. J Foramin Res 30: 202-218.
  4. Bargu S, Sakınç M (1987). Armutlu yarımadasında Kretase Paleosen iliskisi (Cretaceous-Paleocene relation in the Armutlu Peninsula). Tür Jeo Bült 30: 18-48 (in Turkish with English abstract). Baykal F (1942). Géologie de la Région de Şile, Kocaeli (Bithynie), Anatolie. İÜ Fen Fak Mecmuası 3: 166-233 (in French with Turkish abstract). Baykal F (1943). Études géologiques dans la région de Kandıra- Adapazar. İÜ Fen Fak Mecmuası 4: 256-263 (in French with Turkish abstract). Berggren WA, Aubry MP, van Fossen M, Kent DV, Norris RD, Quillévéré F (2000). Integrated Paleocene calcareous plankton magnetobiochronology and stable isotope stratigraphy: DSDP Site 384 (NW Atlantic Ocean). Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 159: 1-51.
  5. Berggren WA, Kent DV, Swisher CC 3rd, Aubry MP (1995). A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy. Soc Econ Pal Min Spec Pub 54: 129-131.
  6. Berggren WA, Miller KG (1988). Paleogene tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and magnetobiochronology. Micropaleontology 34: 362-380.
  7. Berggren WA, Pearson PN (2005). A revised tropical to subtropical Paleogene planktonic foraminiferal distribution. J Foramin Res 35: 279-298.
  8. Blow WH (1969). Late Middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Volume 1. Leiden, the Netherlands: E.J. Brill, pp. 199-422.
  9. Blow WH (1979). The Cainozoic Globigerinidae, 3 Volumes. Leiden, the Netherlands: E.J. Brill. Bolli HM (1957). Planktonic foraminifera from the Oligocene-Miocene Cipero and Lengua formations of Trinidad. US Nat Hist Bull 215: 97-123.
  10. Çakır Ş (1998). İzmit-Körfez (Kocaeli) dolayının ve