Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6

Investigating edge detection, Curie point depth, and heat flow using EMAG2 magnetic and EGM08 gravity data in the northern part of Eastern Anatolia, Turkey

Sayfa
805–821
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A good relationship was detected between the CPDs and the heat flow values.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The edge detection, the Curie point depths (CPDs), and the heat flow in the northern part of Eastern Anatolia were examinedusing EMAG2 magnetic and EGM08 Bouguer gravity data.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the study area, the tilt angle, total horizontal derivative, theta map, and 3D Euler deconvolutionmethods were used to delineate the subsurface geology and heterogeneity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A good relationship was detected between the CPDs and the heat flow values.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The edge detection, the Curie point depths (CPDs), and the heat flow in the northern part of Eastern Anatolia were examinedusing EMAG2 magnetic and EGM08 Bouguer gravity data. Edge detection methods are extensively employed to delineate the edgesof sources using potential field data. In the study area, the tilt angle, total horizontal derivative, theta map, and 3D Euler deconvolutionmethods were used to delineate the subsurface geology and heterogeneity. The 3D Euler deconvolution method was carried out todetermine the depth of the subsurface magnetic and gravity anomalies. The Euler depth solutions show that the depths range from 0to 15 km for the Bouguer gravity anomalies, while the depths vary from 0 to 16 km for the magnetic anomalies. In this study area, theCPD values vary between 15.7 km and 18.6 km. For a thermal conductivity of 2.5 W m–1 K–1, the heat flow values were determined tobe between 75 and 95 mW m–2. A plot of CPDs versus heat flow values revealed an exponential correlation between heat flow and CPDvalues. A good relationship was detected between the CPDs and the heat flow values.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PAMUK, E. (2022). Investigating edge detection, Curie point depth, and heat flow using EMAG2 magnetic and EGM08 gravity data in the northern part of Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6, 805–821. https://ajindex.com/articles/603054

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Abraham EM, Obande EG, Chukwu M, Chukwu CG, Onwe MR (2015). Estimating depth to the bottom of magnetic sources at Wikki Warm Spring region, northeastern Nigeria, using fractal distribution of sources approach. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 24(5): 494-512.
  2. Altınoğlu FF, Sarı M, Aydın A (2015). Detection of lineaments in Denizli basin of western Anatolia region using Bouguer gravity data. Pure and Applied Geophysics 1722: 415-425.
  3. Alvandi A, Asil RH (2014). Edge detection process of Qom salt dome gravity anomalies using hyperbolic tilt angle. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 52: 209-224.
  4. Arslan M, Tüysüz N, Korkmaz S, Kurt H (1997). Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the Eastern Pontide volcanic rocks, Northeast Turkey. Chemie der Erde 57:157-187.
  5. Ateş A, Bilim F, Büyüksaraç A (2005). Curie point depth investigation of Central Anatolia, Turkey. Pure and Applied Geophysics 162(2): 357-371.
  6. Aydın İ, Karat Hİ, Koçak A (2005). Curie-point depth map of Turkey. Geophysical Journal International 162(2): 633-640.4. Barka A, Gülen L (1989). Complex Evolution of the Erzincan Basin (Eastern Turkey) and its Pull-apart and Continental Escape Origin. Journal of Structural Geology 11: 275-283.
  7. Barka A, Akyüz HS, Cohen HA, Watchorn F (2000). Tectonic evolution of the Niksar and Tasova–Erbaa pull-apart basins, North Anatolian Fault Zone: their significance for the motion of the Anatolian block. Tectonophysics 322(3-4), 243-264.
  8. Bektaş O, Yılmaz C, Taslı K, Akdağ K, Özgür S (1995). Cretaceous rifting of the Eastern Pontides carbonate platform (NE Turkey): the formation of the carbonate breccias and turbidit. Geologia 57(1-2): 233-244.
  9. Bektaş Ö, Ravat D, Büyüksaraç A, Bilim F, Ateş A (2007). Regional geothermal characterisation of East Anatolia from aeromagnetic, heat flow and gravity data. Pure and Applied Geophysics 164(5): 975-998.
  10. Bilim F (2007). Investigations into the tectonic lineaments and thermal structure of Kutahya–Denizli region, western Anatolia, from using aeromagnetic, gravity and seismological data. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 165(3-4): 135-146.
  11. Bilim F, Akay T, Aydemir A, Kosaroglu S (2016). Curie point depth, heat-flow and radiogenic heat production deduced from the spectral analysis of the aeromagnetic data for geothermal investigation on the Menderes Massif and the Aegean Region, western Turkey. Geothermics 60: 44-57.
  12. Bilim F, Aydemir A, Ates A (2017). Tectonics and thermal structure in the Gulf of Iskenderun (southern T