Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Structure of the Büyük Menderes Graben systems from gravity anomalies

Sayfa
544–557
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to model geometry, the thickness ofthe sedimentary deposits decreases to the south of the graben.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Büyük Menderes Graben (BMG) of western Turkey is bounded by E–W oriented normal faults and has been a depositional center for thick sedimentary layers since the Miocene.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we focused on the structural characteristicsof the BMG using Bouguer gravity data covering the area between 37°N and 39°N and 26°30′E and 30°E and gravity data along 4 profilesto estimate the discontinuous basement relief of the BMG.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to model geometry, the thickness ofthe sedimentary deposits decreases to the south of the graben.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The Büyük Menderes Graben (BMG) of western Turkey is bounded by E–W oriented normal faults and has been a depositional center for thick sedimentary layers since the Miocene. Four Mio-Pliocene depressions (from west to east, the Çine, Bozdoğan, Karacasu,and Denizli basins) having overall N–S trends are situated just south of the BMG. In this study, we focused on the structural characteristicsof the BMG using Bouguer gravity data covering the area between 37°N and 39°N and 26°30′E and 30°E and gravity data along 4 profilesto estimate the discontinuous basement relief of the BMG. Our main objectives were to investigate the geometry of the faults boundingthe BMG and surrounding faults, and to describe the extent of the cross-graben structures. Boundary analysis, analytical signals, andsecond derivative methods were applied to Bouguer gravity data in order to determine tectonic border lines. The 2D inversion of gravitydata together with the analysis of the power spectrum for each profile exposed an image of the subsurface. As a result of both methods,the thickness of the sedimentary cover was determined to be 1.44–2.3 km in the BMG. According to model geometry, the thickness ofthe sedimentary deposits decreases to the south of the graben.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TİMUR, E., ŞALK, M., SARI, C., KAFTAN, İ. (2022). Structure of the Büyük Menderes Graben systems from gravity anomalies. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 544–557. https://ajindex.com/articles/603019

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Altınoğlu FF, Sarı M, Aydın A (2018). Shallow crust structure of the Büyük Menderes graben through an analysis of gravity data. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 27: 421-431.
  2. Bayrak M, Serpen Ü, İlkışık OM (2011). Two-dimensional resistivity imaging in the Kızıldere geothermal field by MT and DC methods. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 204: 1-11.
  3. Blakely RJ, Simpson RW (1986). Approximating edge of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics 51: 1494-1498.
  4. Bozkurt E (2001). Late Alpine evolution of the central Menderes Massif, western Turkey. International Journal of Earth Sciences 89 (4): 728-744.
  5. Bozkurt E, Park RG (1994). Southern Menderes Massif: an incipient metamorphic core complex in western Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society 151: 213-216.
  6. Bozkurt E, Sözbilir H (2004). Geology of the Gediz Graben: new field evidence and tectonic significance. Geological Magazine 141: 63-79.
  7. Catlos EJ, Çemen İ (2005). Monazite ages and the evolution of the Menderes Massif, western Turkey. International Journal of Earth Sciences 94: 204-217.
  8. Çemen İ, Catlos EJ, Göğüs O, Özerdem C (2006). Post collisional extensional tectonics and exhumation of the Menderes massif in the Western Anatolia extended terrane, Turkey. In: Dilek Y, Pavlides S (editors). Post-collisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Boulder, CO, USA: Geological Society of America, pp. 353-379.
  9. Çifçi G, Pamukçu O, Çoruh C, Çopur S, Sözbilir H (2011). Shallow and deep structure of a supra detachment basin based on geological, conventional deep seismic reflection sections and gravity data in the Büyük Menderes Graben, Western Anatolia. Surveys in Geophysics 32: 271-290.
  10. Çiftçi NB, Bozkurt E (2009). Evolution of the Miocene sedimentary fill of the Gediz Graben, SW Turkey. Sedimentary Geology 216: 49-79.
  11. Çiftçi NB, Bozkurt E (2010). Structural evolution of the Gediz Graben, SW Turkey temporal and spatial variation of the graben basin. Basin Research 22: 846-873.
  12. Cohen HA, Dart CJ, Akyüz HS, Barka A (1995). Syn-rift sedimentation and structural development of the Gediz and Büyük Menderes graben, western Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society of London 152: 629-638.
  13. Cordell L, Grauch VJS (1982). Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. In: 52nd Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 246-247.
  14. Cordell L, Grauch VJS (1985). Mapping