Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Hydrogeochemical fingerprints of a mixohaline wetland in the Mediterranean: Güllük coastal wetland systems- GCWS (Muğla, Turkey)

Sayfa
38–58
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hydrogeological protected zones should be determined to ensure the sustainability of groundwater resources and provide the economy of the country.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Güllük coastal wetland system (GCWS), which is located at the contact point of the Menderes Massif and Lycian Nappe, consists of both brackish karstic [Güllük Lagoon wetland (GLW)] and saline [Boğaziçi-Tuzla (Bargylia) coastal wetland (BTW)] ecosystems in western Turkey, and is under protection as a national wetland of importance.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The electrical conductivity (EC) values of Limni Lake and the Tuzla salt pan were measured as 15,330 and 41,000 µS/cm, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hydrogeological protected zones should be determined to ensure the sustainability of groundwater resources and provide the economy of the country.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The Güllük coastal wetland system (GCWS), which is located at the contact point of the Menderes Massif and Lycian Nappe, consists of both brackish karstic [Güllük Lagoon wetland (GLW)] and saline [Boğaziçi-Tuzla (Bargylia) coastal wetland (BTW)] ecosystems in western Turkey, and is under protection as a national wetland of importance. This area is important for its unique wetland features, aquaculture, tourism, agriculture, Bodrum airport, and Güllük port facilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the GLW and BTW, both hydrogeologically and hydrogeochemically, for the first time together. The mixohaline GCWS is recharged from precipitation, streams, and brackish karstic springs. The electrical conductivity (EC) values of Limni Lake and the Tuzla salt pan were measured as 15,330 and 41,000 µS/cm, respectively. The EC value of the brackish karstic springs was ~17,310 µS/cm. From the coast to inland, the mixing ratio increases to a maximum of 45% in Savranköy Spring, which discharges from the contact point between Milas Formation and alluvium. The relationship between Na-Cl, $SO_4 -HCO_3$ , and Mg/Ca-Cl showed a weathering by ion exchange and/or seawater intrusion process. All of the groundwater samples comprised NaCl water. In parallel with these results, the diagrams of Gibbs et al. supported the same seawater intrusion phenomena. Brackish karst springs first roseand then fell below sea level with epirogenic movements during the geological period, and therefore, karstification progressed. The samples were oversaturated with calcite, dolomite, and quartz, whereas they were undersaturated with gypsum and halite. The Al, Cu, and Zn values of some of the water samples exceeded the tolerance limit of aquatic life standards. When the samples were evaluated in terms of irrigation water, brackish springs, and streams at Avşar and located near the aquaculture farm, Lake Limni and saltpan had a harmful effect on the plants due to their high Na concentration. These results suggested that the wetland was vulnerable because it was both in a sensitive karstic and a lagoon area. Hydrogeological protected zones should be determined to ensure the sustainability of groundwater resources and provide the economy of the country.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTAŞ, A. M. S. (2022). Hydrogeochemical fingerprints of a mixohaline wetland in the Mediterranean: Güllük coastal wetland systems- GCWS (Muğla, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 38–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/602912

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Alataş İ (1989). Milas-Selimiye-Tekfurambarı Ovaları Hidrojeolojik Etüd Raporu. Devlet Su İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü. Ankara (in Turkish). Allen G, Mandelli E, Zimmermann JPF (1981). Physics, geology, chemistry. In P. Lasserre, H. Postma (editors). Coastal lagoon research, present and future: proceedings of a seminar. UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 32. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, pp. 29-50.
  2. Altınsaçlı S (2013). Güllük Lagününü ve Körfezini Besleyen Acı Su Kaynakları. Güllük Körfezi Bakteriyolojisi TÜBİTAK Proje Çalıştayı, 10 Mayıs 2013,
  3. Güllük, Muğla (In Turkish). Altınsaçlı S, Altınsaçlı S, Perçin-Paçal F (2015-a). Diversity, species composition and habitat preferences of Ostracoda (Crustacea) in seven karstic springs of varying salinity in Milas (Muğla, Turkey). International Journal of Fisheries and Aqutatic Studies 3 (2): 374-390.
  4. Altınsaçlı S, Perçin-Paçal F, Altınsaçlı S (2015-b). Assessments on diversity, spatiotemporal distribution and ecology of the living ostracod species (Crustacea) in oligo-hypersaline coastal wetland of Bargilya (Milas, Muğla, Turkey). International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 3 (2): 357-373.
  5. Arslan A, Güngör T, Erdoğan B, Pisschier CW (2013). Tectonic transport directions of the Lycian nappes in southwest Turkey constrained by kinematic indicators. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 64: 198-209.doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.016 Atalay Z (1980). Muğla-Yatağan ve yakın dolayı karasal Neojeninin stratigrafi araştırılması. Geological Society of Turkey Bulletin 23: 93-99 (in Turkish). Aydin H, Karakuş H, Erdem O (2015). The salinity problem at Yelkoma Lagoon (Yumurtalik-Adana) and its restoration by mixing with freshwater from Ceyhan river. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 24 (1A): 235-243.
  6. Balkıs N, Aksu A, Altuğ G, Çardak M, Çiftçi Türeken PS et al. (2013). Güllük Körfezi Yüzey Sedimentlerinde Metal Birikimi. Güllük Körfezi Bakteriyolojisi TÜBİTAK Proje Çalıştayı, 10 Mayıs 2013,
  7. Güllük, Muğla (in Turkish). Barut İ, Eroskay O, Özer N (2001). Milas-Ekinambarı ve Savranköy Tuzlu Karst Kaynaklarının Hidrojeokimyasal Araştırılması. Tübitak Araştırma Projesi. Proje No: YDABÇAĞ-588/A. Barut İ, Gürpınar O (2005). Milas (Muğla) havzasının tuzlu karst kaynaklarının hidrojeolojik dolaşım modeline bir yaklaşım. İstanbul Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18: 1-22 (in Turkish). Barut İ