Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5

Nutlet structures of subsection Fragiles of the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae) from Turkey and their systematic applications

Sayfa
659–672
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A key is presented for the identification of the examined taxa based on the nutlet properties.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper includes the morphological and anatomical characters of the nutlets of 7 endemic species of the subsection Fragilesof the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae) from Turkey and the systematic significance of these characteristics, using one-way analysis of varianceand cluster and principal component analyses.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The nutlet dimensions range from 1.31 mm to 3.49 mm in length and from 0.84 mm to1.95 mm in width.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A key is presented for the identification of the examined taxa based on the nutlet properties.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This paper includes the morphological and anatomical characters of the nutlets of 7 endemic species of the subsection Fragilesof the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae) from Turkey and the systematic significance of these characteristics, using one-way analysis of varianceand cluster and principal component analyses. Morphological characters such as the dimensions, shapes, colors, and surfaces of thenutlets were studied using light and scanning electron microscopes. The structures and thicknesses of the pericarp and endospermlayers, as well as the sizes of the cotyledon in the nutlets, were anatomically studied. The outcomes revealed that the taxa vary fromeach other in terms of nutlet shape and color. The nutlet dimensions range from 1.31 mm to 3.49 mm in length and from 0.84 mm to1.95 mm in width. While Stachys longiflora and S. pseudopinardii have the largest nutlets, S. chasmosericea has the smallest. The nutletsurface ornamentation was recorded as 5 types: reticulate, scalariform, reticulate-foveate, ruminate, and rugose. The most common typeis reticulate; however, the other ornamentation types are specific for the studied taxa. Anatomically, the structure and thickness of thepericarp parts and the endosperm and the size of the cotyledon are very important characteristics that disclose interspecific relationswithin the studied taxa. A key is presented for the identification of the examined taxa based on the nutlet properties.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNER, Ö., KARAİSMAİLOĞLU, M. C. (2022). Nutlet structures of subsection Fragiles of the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae) from Turkey and their systematic applications. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5, 659–672. https://ajindex.com/articles/600845

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Akçiçek E, Dirmenci T, Dündar E (2012). Taxonomical notes on Stachys sect. Eriostomum (Lamiaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 36: 217-234.
  2. Akçiçek E, Fırat M, Güner Ö (2016). Stachys hakkariensis (Lamiaceae), a new species from eastern Anatolia (Turkey) belonging to Stachys sect. Olisia. Phytotaxa 257: 167-173.
  3. Akgül G, Ketenoglu O, Pınar NM, Kurt L (2008). Pollen and seed morphology of the genus Marrubium (Lamiaceae) in Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 45: 1-10.
  4. Ball PW (1972). Stachys. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burgess NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH et al. (editors). Flora Europaea, Vol. 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151-157.
  5. Barthlott W (1981). Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 345-355.
  6. Bhattacharjee R (1980). Taxonomic studies in Stachys II: A new infrageneric classification of Stachys L. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh 38: 65-96.
  7. Bhattacharjee R (1982). Stachys. In: Davis PH (editor). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 7. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 199-262.
  8. Budantsev AL, Lobova TA (1997). Fruit morphology, anatomy and taxonomy of Tribe Nepeteae (Labiatae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 54: 183-216.
  9. Davis PH, Mill RR, Tan K (1988). Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands (Suppl. 1). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  10. Demissew S, Harley MM (1992). Trichome, seed surface and pollen characters in Stachys (Lamioideae: Labiatae) in Tropical Africa. In: Harley RM, Reynolds T (editors). Advances in Labiatae Science. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 345-355.
  11. Dinç M, Doğu S, Bilgili B, Duran A (2009). Comparative anatomical and micromorphological studies on Teucrium creticum and Teucrium orientale var. orientale (Teucrium sect. Teucrium, Lamiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 27: 251-256.
  12. Dinç M, Öztürk M (2008). Comparative morphological, anatomical, and palynological studies on the genus Stachys L. sect. Ambleia Bentham (Lamiaceae) species in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 32: 113-121.
  13. Duletic-Lausevic S, Marin PD (1999). Pericarp structure and myxocarpy in selected genera of Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 435-446
  14. Duman H (2000). Stachys L. In: Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Baser KHC (editors). Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands (Suppl. 2). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 204-206.
  15. Ecevit Genç G, Özcan T, Dirmenci T (2015). Micromorphologi