Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Structural characterization of ITS2 and CBC species concept applications in the tribe Coluteocarpeae (Brassicaceae)

Sayfa
295–308
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A phylogenetic tree basedon the sequence-structural dataset of the ITS2 showed that generic delimitation of Al-Shehbaz was more acceptable due to the fact thatNoccaea sensu Al-Shehbaz is monophyletic.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The taxonomic utility of internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) secondary structures in different plant groups, as well as inBrassicaceae, has been addressed by many studies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although characterization and applications of ITS2 secondary structures for themembers of main Brassicaceae lineages (Lineages I, II, III, and expanded Lineage II) have been studied, the utility of compensatory basechange (CBC) species concept has not been the subject of any studies thus far.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A phylogenetic tree basedon the sequence-structural dataset of the ITS2 showed that generic delimitation of Al-Shehbaz was more acceptable due to the fact thatNoccaea sensu Al-Shehbaz is monophyletic.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:49specimens
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The taxonomic utility of internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) secondary structures in different plant groups, as well as inBrassicaceae, has been addressed by many studies. Although characterization and applications of ITS2 secondary structures for themembers of main Brassicaceae lineages (Lineages I, II, III, and expanded Lineage II) have been studied, the utility of compensatory basechange (CBC) species concept has not been the subject of any studies thus far. In the current study, the ITS2 secondary structures of49 Coluteocarpeae (expanded Lineage II) specimens were investigated to determine relationships among the species. In addition to theutility of the CBC species concept, the availability of hemi-CBC and nonstructural substitutions (NSTs), which are also used for genericand species delimitation, were tested and discussed. A maximum likelihood tree, based on the sequence-structural alignment of the 49specimens, was constructed to test the different generic assumptions reported by different researchers in the literature. The structuralanalysis showed that the ITS2 secondary structures of all of the Coluteocarpeae members exhibited a 4-fingered hand model, whichwas common in the majority of the family members. No CBCs were observed, whereas hemi-CBCs and NSTs were common amongthe tribe members. Although hemi-CBCs and NSTs were useful for distinguishing most of the Coluteocarpeae species (Noccaea aptera(Velen.) F.K. Mey., Noccaea aghrica (P.H. Davis & Kit Tan) M. Fırat & Özüdoğru, Noccaea fendleri (A.Gray) Holub subsp. glauca (A.Nelson) Al-Shehbaz & M. Koch, Noccaea griffithiana (Boiss.) F.K. Mey., Noccaea rubescens (Schott & Kotschy ex Boiss.) F.K. Mey., etc.),they were not effective for delimitating some problematic species, such as members of Thlaspiceras F.K. Mey. A phylogenetic tree basedon the sequence-structural dataset of the ITS2 showed that generic delimitation of Al-Shehbaz was more acceptable due to the fact thatNoccaea sensu Al-Shehbaz is monophyletic.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZGİŞİ, K. (2022). Structural characterization of ITS2 and CBC species concept applications in the tribe Coluteocarpeae (Brassicaceae). Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 295–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/600805

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Ali T, Schmuker A, Runge F, Solovyeva I, Nigrelli L et al. (2016a). Morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of Microthlaspi (Brassicaceae: Coluteocarpeae) and related genera. Taxon 65 (1): 79-98. doi: 10.12705/651.6 Ali T, Runge F, Dutbayev A, Schmuker A, Solovyeva I et al. (2016b). Microthlaspi erraticum (Jord.) T. Ali et Thines has a wide distribution, ranging from the Alps to the Tien Shan. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 225: 76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.09.008 Al-Shehbaz, IA (2014). A synopsis of the genus Noccaea (Coluteocarpeae, Brassicaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany: 19(1): 25-51. doi:10.3100/hpib.v19iss1.2014.n3 Al-Shehbaz IA (2012). A generic and tribal synopsis of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae). Taxon 61 (5): 931-954. doi: 10.1002/ tax.615002 Al-Shehbaz IA, Beilstein MA, Kellogg EA (2006). Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview. Plant Systematics and Evolution 259 (2-4): 89-120. doi: 10.1007/ s00606-006-0415-z Ankenbrand MJ, Keller A, Wolf M, Schultz J, Förster F (2015). ITS2 database V: Twice as much. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32 (11): 3030-3032. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv174 Artelari R (2002). Thlaspi. In: Strid A, Tan K (editors). Flora Helenica. Vol. 2. Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag, pp. 253-261.
  2. Aytaç Z, Nordt B, Parolly G (2006). A new species of Noccaea (Brassicaceae) from South Anatolia, Turkey. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 150(3): 409-416.
  3. Bowman JL, Brüggemann H, Lee JY, Mummenhoff K. (1999). Evolutionary changes in floral structure within Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 (5): 917-929. doi: 10.1086/314194 Budak M, Güler M, Korkmaz EM, Örgen SH, Başıbüyük HH (2016). The characterization and taxonomic utility of ITS2 in Tenthredopsis Costa, 1859 (Tenthredinidae: Hymenoptera) with some new records from Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 66: 76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.03.008 Coleman AW, Vacquier VD (2002). Exploring the phylogenetic utility of ITS sequences for animals: a test case for abalone (Haliotis). Journal of Molecular Evolution 54 (2): 246-257. doi: 10.1007/s00239-001-0006-0
  4. Coleman AW (2003). ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. Trends in Genetics 19 (7): 370-375. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525 (03)00118-5
  5. Coleman AW (2009). Is there a molecular key to the level of “biological species” in eukaryotes? A DNA guide. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50 (1): 197-203. doi: 10.1