Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Current nomenclature and systematics of Capsella Medik. with lectotypifications: towards solving the puzzle

Sayfa
142–159
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Their distribution around the world was checked and then corrected, and an identification key is given for the taxa of the genus.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The taxonomic history of Capsella Medik., one of the genera with the highest phenotypic plasticity, and thus the highest synonym number relative to the recognized species number, was reviewed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Considering the molecular studies that have been conducted over the 30 years it was concluded that the species of this genus are typical examples of the concept of cryptic species.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Their distribution around the world was checked and then corrected, and an identification key is given for the taxa of the genus.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The taxonomic history of Capsella Medik., one of the genera with the highest phenotypic plasticity, and thus the highest synonym number relative to the recognized species number, was reviewed. The current systematics of the genus was discussed and the exact number of taxa was determined. In light of the molecular and nomenclatural data, it was decided that the genus was represented around the world by five species and one hybrid. Considering the molecular studies that have been conducted over the 30 years it was concluded that the species of this genus are typical examples of the concept of cryptic species. The classification and nomenclature of such genetically different, morphologically similar species should be one of the most current discussion topics of modern systematic science. Capsella is one of the best examples to examine this situation; hence, this feature was discussed herein. It was decided that C. thracica and C. × abortiva are conspecific and the correct naming should be C. abortiva (pro hybr.). Lectotype assignments were performed for the names of 5 taxa, mainly C. rubella, C. × abortiva, and C. thracica. Also, the missing type specimen of the Turkish endemic C. lycia was found, the lectotype was assigned and it was determined to be a synonym of C. bursa-pastoris. Various errors in the type sample references, especially in the holotype of C. grandiflora, were thus corrected. Their distribution around the world was checked and then corrected, and an identification key is given for the taxa of the genus.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜZEL, Y. (2022). Current nomenclature and systematics of Capsella Medik. with lectotypifications: towards solving the puzzle. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 142–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/600725

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Abdelaziz M, Lorite J, Muñoz‐Pajares AJ, Herrador MB, Perfectti F et al. (2011). Using complementary techniques to distinguish cryptic species: a new Erysimum (Brassicaceae) species from North Africa. American Journal of Botany 98 (6): 1049-1060. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000438 Aksoy A, Hale WH, Dixon JM (1999). Towards a simplified taxonomy of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. (Brassicaceae). Watsonia 22 (3): 243-250.
  2. Almquist EB (1907). Studien über die Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.). Acta Horti Bergiani 4 (6): 1-92. Stockholm. https://www. biodiversitylibrary.org/item/96779#page/218/mode/1up Almquist EB (1921). Bursa pastoris Weber. Supplement to report of Botanical Society and Exchange Club for 1920 6 (1): 179-207. http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/BEC_1920_Vol_6_pt_1).pdf
  3. Almquist EB (1923). Studien über die Capsella bursa pastoris (L.) II. Acta Horti Bergiani 7: 41-95.
  4. Stockholm. Al-Shehbaz IA (1986). The genera of Lepidieae (Brassicaceae; Cruciferae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 67: 265-311. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.27392 Al-Shehbaz IA, Beilstein MA, Kellogg EA (2006). Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview. Plant Systematics and Evolution 259 (2): 89-120. doi: 10.1007/ s00606-006-0415-z Auquier P, Sérusiaux E (1978). Capsella rubella Reut. et C.× gracilis Gren. en Belgique. Bulletin de la Société Royale de Botanique de Belgique/Bulletin van de Koninklijke Belgische Botanische Vereniging, Pp. 62-68.
  5. Averett JE (1980). Polyploidy in plant taxa: summary. Pp. 269-273 in: Lewis W.H. (ed.), Polyploidy, biological relevance. Plenum Press, New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3069-1_15 Beilstein MA, Al‐Shehbaz IA, Kellogg EA (2006). Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution. American Journal of Botany 93 (4): 607-619. doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.4.607 Billot PC (1858). Annotations à la flore de France et d’Allemagne. Pp. 124. Bleeker W (2003). Hybridization and Rorippa austriaca (Brassicaceae) invasion in Germany. 12: 1831-1841. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 294X.2003.01854.x Bleeker W, Hurka H (2001). Introgressive hybridization in Rorippa (Brassicaceae): gene flow and its consequences in natural and anthropogenic habitats. Molecular Ecology 10: 2013-2022. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01341.x Bleeker W, Matthies A (2005). Hybrid zones between invasive Rorippa austriaca and native R. sylvestris (Brassicaceae) in Germany: ploidy levels and patterns of fitness in the field. Heredity. 94 (6): 664-670. doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.