KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

Silver nanoparticles induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in tomato plants

Dilek ÜNAL
Fazilet Özlem ÇEKİÇ
Sefa EKİNCİ
Müslüm Süleyman İNAL
Sayfa
700–707
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

AgNPs could also have negative effects on tomato plants by enhancing DNA damage and lipid peroxidation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Among nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are intensively used in many materials owing to their antibacterial effects.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:RWC did not change under AgNPs treatments; however, total chlorophyll content was significantly reduced by AgNPs applications.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:AgNPs could also have negative effects on tomato plants by enhancing DNA damage and lipid peroxidation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Among nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are intensively used in many materials owing to their antibacterial effects. In the present study different concentrations of AgNPs in Hoagland solution were applied to tomato seedlings. Total chlorophyll content, relative water content (RWC), antioxidant enzyme activities, and malondialdehyde content (MDA) as well as the genomic template stability (GTS) were analyzed. The intersimple sequence repeat polymerase chain reaction assay (ISSR-PCR) was used to determine the genotoxic effects of AgNPs on DNA. RWC did not change under AgNPs treatments; however, total chlorophyll content was significantly reduced by AgNPs applications. ISSR profiles demonstrated a consistent increase in polymorphic bands by the increase in the concentration of AgNPs. GTS value was also reduced depending on the concentration of AgNPs. SOD and APX activities were increased under low AgNPs treatments; however, these activities were decreased under high concentrations of AgNPs treatments. Tomato plants could be sensitive to AgNPs within the increase in MDA content in all of the AgNPs treatments. AgNPs nanotoxicity could be quite dose-dependent. AgNPs could also have negative effects on tomato plants by enhancing DNA damage and lipid peroxidation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÜNAL, D., ÇEKİÇ, F. Ö., EKİNCİ, S., İNAL, M. S. (2022). Silver nanoparticles induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in tomato plants. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 700–707. https://ajindex.com/articles/600315

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Arnon DI (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24: 1-15.
  2. Allen RD, Gupta SA, Webb RP, Holaday AS (1994). Protection of plants from oxidative stress using SOD transgenes: interactions with endogenous enzymes. In: Asada K, Yoshikawa T, editors. Frontiers of Reactive Oxygen Species in Biology and Medicine. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Excerpta Medica, pp. 321-322.
  3. Atienzar FA, Conradi M, Evenden AJ, Jha AN, Depledge MH (1999). Qualitative assessment of genotoxicity using random-amplified polymorphic DNA: comparison of genomic template stability with key fitness parameters in Daphnia magna exposed to benzo[a]pyrene. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 2275-2282.
  4. Bajpai R, Shukla V, Singh N, Rana TS, Upreti DK (2015). Physiological and genetic effects of chromium (+VI) on toxitolerant lichen species, Pyxine cocoes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22: 3727-3738.
  5. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962). A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci 15: 413-428.
  6. Bergmeyer N (1970). Methoden der Enzymatischen Analyse. Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag. Beyer WF, Fridowich I (1987). Assaying for superoxide dismutase activity: some large consequences of minor changes in conditions. Anal Biochem 161: 559-566.
  7. Bornet B, Branchard M (2001). Nonanchored Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers: reproducible and specific tools for genome fingerprinting. Plant Mol Biol Report 19: 209-215.
  8. Bowler C, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1992). Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43: 83-116.
  9. Bradford MM (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantization of micro-gram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of the protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248- 254. Carlberg I, Mannervik B (1985). Glutathione reductase. Methods Enzymol 113: 484-490.
  10. Correia S, Matos M, Ferreira V, Martins N, Gonçalves S, Romano A, Pinto-Carnide O (2014). Molecular instability induced by aluminum stress in Plantago species. Mutat Res - Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 770: 105-111.
  11. Dimkpa CO, Mclean JE, Martineau N, Britt DW, Haverkamp R, Anderson AJ (2013). Silver nanoparticles disrupt wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth in a sand matrix. Environ Sci Technol 47: 1082-1090.
  12. Fatima RA, Ahmad M (2005). Certain antioxidant enzymes of Allium cepa as biomarkers for the detection of toxic heavy metals in wastewater. Sci Total Environ 346: 256-273.
  13. Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tan